3News » Home

Expenses scandal: Will Jones career survive? - blog

MPs have a sense of entitlement when it comes to their credit cards according to Duncan Garner MPs have a sense of entitlement when it comes to their credit cards according to Duncan Garner
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:55p.m.

By Duncan Garner

Shane Jones has just suffered the biggest blow of his career. He will be lucky to survive this.

The ministerial credit card bills are out for the period 2003-2008 and former minister Jones has been nailed.

Jones chartered a plane for $1200, purchased dozens of pay-for-view movies in hotels, books, CDs, newspapers, Powerades, chocolates, cashews, magazines, panadol pills - you name it - Jones racked it up on the taxpayer and then ignored repeated warnings to sort out his receipts and reconcile it.

But the most worrying trend is the pay-for-view movies at $19.90 a pop.

Jones won't say whether they are adult movies - it's likely they are at that cost. There is a trend in the receipts and it's embarrassing for Jones. He's been completely caught out.

Night after night Jones orders a movie. One night he orders three movies. He says he's a movie buff - but there's something more to it.

He's paid back about $6000, but the cost of this for Jones is yet to come.

Labour is right now unsure how to play it. The party would probably like Jones to resign. But he's showing no sign of that as I write this column. If he doesn't Labour's list ranking committee is likely to demote him so far down the list for the next election that he never gets back to Parliament.

But Jones is not the only offender. Chris Carter has been caught out using the ministerial credit card to send flowers to his partner on his birthday. He also purchased a massage in Cambodia and a sauna in Berlin. Both times they went on his personal card - but it shows up on the list of spending anyway.

Former Associate Maori Affairs Minister Mita Ririnui purchased $600 worth of golf clubs in Australia, and a $900 bike. Both times he reimbursed the taxpayer. Does he not have his own credit card or Eftpos card? He was paid $200k a year.

National's Trade Minister Tim Groser is also in the gun for his spending on alcohol - two bottles of $400 dollar whiskey. Here's to you too Tim!

But it's Jones that's in trouble as I write this. Big trouble.

There's a serious pattern of abuse amongst his spending - and he's admitting it - he has no other option. The biggest question though in al this are the movies. What was he watching? And why didn't he adhere to the repeated warnings to sort all this out.

Jones says he will not resign over any of this. He's showing signs he will tough it out. But his career - in the short to medium term is in serious tatters. He has been touted as a future leader - this is massive blow to his chances.

Indeed - he'll be lucky to be in Parliament after the next election. There's no talk yet of expelling him from the caucus. But depending on how he handles himself over this and how he fronts - Labour's list committee, as I mentioned earlier, may decide to rank him so lowly at the next election that he has no chance of a return.

Jones has let himself down. He will know that now. But what did he expect? He was warned - now the consequences will flow.

Labour no longer has any right to attack Bill English for his spending rorts. This is Jones' day of shame. This is New Zealand's equivalent of the British spending scandal.

All MPs are tarnished by this. It looks like they have a culture of entitlement - and they do. What a disgrace. No wonder the public has little faith. They have every right to be bagging the hell out of Jones and the others as they head into this weekend.

Please vote for this blog in the NetGuide Web Awards.

Duncan Garner is the 3 News Political Editor based in Wellington. Here he offers his views and commentary on the developments of New Zealand's politics from within the Press Gallery.

 
Subscribe to this blog by email
  

Duncan Garner's Entries

Comments [36]

cut the allowances
23 Oct 2010 6:33p.m.

hey come on , cut the current exorbitant and seemingly unnecessary mp allowances, stop them receiving further allowances, parliamentary benefits including air travel long after they have left or retired from their very well paid "service" - how is this justifiable , it is not, and especially them receiving pay increases at the pleasure of the pm year after flipping year

James
14 Jun 2010 2:19p.m.

Don - I think your point sums it up. These errors always seem to curiously end up in the MPs favour.

timothy
14 Jun 2010 11:18a.m.

ONE DAY SOON DUNCAN THE PEASENTS WONT STORM PARLIAMENT , THEY WILL STORM THE MEDIA OFFICERS IN THIS COUNTRY WITH PITCH FAWLKS . HUNTING THE MEDIA SEELOUTS DOWN . THE PRINT WHAT THEIR ARE TOLD TO, DUNCANS THE SAME SO LONG AS THE PAY MASTER PAYS DUNCAN GARNER AND THOSE LIKE HIM WILL CONTINUE TO COVER ONLY THOSE STORYS HIS CORPRET PAY MASTERS TELL HIM TW. BECOUSE BIG BUSINESS OWNS THE MEDIA .THE PRESS ARE A DISCRASE.

Dave2
13 Jun 2010 5:44p.m.

You know the Police have a written code of conduct and it revolves around ethics and professionalism. They also have a clause about scrutiny. If you think you would not like to read about your actions in a newspaper then don't do it. It is probably wrong. Police might get away with something legally but are still liable for unprofessional behaviour under the code.

So the question is why do the "leaders" of the this country not have a Code of Conduct? Do they really believe the taxpayer should foot the bill for booze, flowers, blue movies, tourist trips, holidays, expensive taxi rides? Do they believe they are above a Code of Conduct?

Where the hell are their ethics?

RobertM
12 Jun 2010 9:43p.m.

Hetrosexual members of parliament who play around seem popular with voters in other nations. Bob Hawke was a notorious phillanderer and boozer at least during his union career and much of the reason the voters of Massachusetts continually returned him Edward Kennedy to the Senate was the voters who saw him speak saw a human bull, loud at the Michrophone and were impressed by his manliness and reports of womanising with staffers a third of his age, much more than his liberal voting record and PC stands. I read the polls and hear the talkback outrage, but can't really see Shane Jones has committed any great outrage. If Jones had committed audultery with an attractive staffer maybe it would be seen as more impressive. Surely voters want a real man to vote for. I just don't get this country, I find the anger of the public over a few piddling expenses and a bit of porn no more harmful than playboy or hustler ridiculous. The public seem to resent the MPs who in their eyes don't do real work and aren't very impressive or outstanding people. It would be interesting to know how Jones got to Harvard. Indigenous quota or something, possibly.

timothy
12 Jun 2010 3:52p.m.

COME ON DUNCAN ADMIT IT YOUR JOB ALONG WITH TV ONE AND THE MAIN PAPPERS IS TO KEEP THE POPULATION DOMB AS MUD , AND TO GET NATIONAL RE ELECTED THATS YOUR MISSION . SOMETIMES TV 3 ISNT AS BLATENT AS TV ONE BUT THEIR PAY MASTERS TO YOU EXACTLY WHAT TO PRINT DONT THEY DUNCAN ? .THE MEDIA BYE AND LARGE IS BROUGHT AND PAID FOR . THEY HAVE WAGED WHAT IS BASICLY A FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS A NON STOP ANTI LABOUR CAMPAIGN . NOT THAT LABOURS ANY BETTER THAN NATIONAL , ITS JUST I WANT DUNCAN TO KNOW IM AT LEAST NOT STUPID MATE .I CAN SEE WHATS GOING ON .THE PARTY THAT WINS ELECTIONS IS THE PARTY THE MEDIA IS MOST TALKING UP AND DUNCAN KNOWS IT .

Brent
12 Jun 2010 9:30a.m.

timothy's on to something here, What about Clark's out of Court settlements over the last 10 years.

Craig Young
11 Jun 2010 1:33p.m.

Duncan:
I would submit that we need clear, cross-party constraints on expenditure and redline what is surplus expenditure. Next, we need to consider the question of magnitude. None of the errant financial transactions recorded thus far appear to be on the scale of what has occurred in the United Kingdom, to name one glaring point of comparison.

As for Shane Jones' gaffe, it is sad. Is it a career-ender? I hope not. A temporary demotion may be in order, but given Jones' intellect and talent, it probably won't last long. And as for any Nat apologists seeking to make political capital out of this, two words: Richard Worth.

Ruz
11 Jun 2010 12:51p.m.

I think the key point in Garner's piece is the last paragraph. Yes - the notion that MPs' consider some of these outrageous items of expenditure as an entitlement. It seems to me that when you tally up the reported incidents of "rorting" by MPs' that it no longer matters whether they belong to National or Labour. The public of NZ should be fuming about the willingness of MPs to steal from us. This thieving must stop, and it must stop now.

Katie
11 Jun 2010 12:05p.m.

Integrity is what you do when nobody is watching. Dont we demand integrity of our representatives? Porn/blue movies are addictive, and are an abuse of all women, men as they are of children. It shows a sad flaw of character to misappropriate funds, for these personal purposes. I dont like thieves.. I will not tolerate such gross behaviour. Labour needs to do something about these candidates, including list MPs. As indeed does National. We need integrity in those people in power. Heatley should never have been given a second chance,although he did the complete submission thing.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio