• Full Story

Expert: Pike lacked understanding of electrical problems

Print

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 2:48p.m.

Asutralian expert Tony Reczek says sparks could have ignited methane anywhere in the mine

Asutralian expert Tony Reczek says sparks could have ignited methane anywhere in the mine

By Emma Mackie

An Australian consultant says employees at Pike River lacked understanding of the electrical issues that may have ignited the explosion at the mine.

Tony Reczek gave detailed technical evidence at the Royal Commission of Inquiry this morning regarding the likely electrical source of ignition that caused the explosion, killing 29 men.

He told the inquiry there were two likely sources of electrical ignition; one was the inadequacy of the power supply to the mine and the other, stray electrical currents that could “go walkabout” and ignite methane anywhere throughout the mine.

He said the appropriate use of explosive-proof and flameproof enclosures on electrical equipment was a concern.

Mr Reczek also said the turning on of a switch from the control room could have increased the likelihood of stray currents that sparked the explosion.

He said the apparent lack of understanding of electrical issues at the mine made him uncomfortable and he did not believe there was a clear-cut understanding of how to tackle these issues at Pike River.

The expert witness also questioned the installation of the main fan underground, saying he had not seen a set-up like it anywhere else in the world.

However, spokesman for the families of the 29 men killed in the disaster, Bernie Monk, says the “hearsay” nature of the evidence is another reason they should get into the mine as soon as possible to retrieve further evidence from the scene of the explosion.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13 Feb 2012 07:18p.m.

Mike wrote:

I agree with Bernie Monk on this that all these theories do nothing and yet another theory withut even entering the mine solves nothing in understanding what happened.

Till someone goes in, can't tell what happened, and even then they may not know exactly. There multiple explosions so in some cases telling which explosion went first may be difficult.

Obviously some source of methane opened up pouring massive amounts of methane into an area and somehow it ignited. An electrical fault is being blamed in several theories, yet methane mixed with oxygen can explode without an electrical starter. The concentrations of methane later prove it was massive amounts of methane released - still the source is unknown and only being guessed at. Its possible it was on the coal face where they were mining, or it could have been elsewhere. Even a tiny tremor of a quake may have started a crack which lead to a release from somewhere else. So many possibilitiies and most of them uncontrolable even if Pike River had done everything as the imported experts are stipulating in hindsight that they would have liked.