3News » Home
Full Story

Family Court costing more but no better

6 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Justice Minister Simon Power (file)

Justice Minister Simon Power (file)

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 3:12p.m.

Family Court processes are to be reviewed after an investigation by the justice ministry found escalating costs and little evidence of benefits for children and other vulnerable people.

Justice Minister Simon Power says that since 2004/05 the court's costs have increased 63 per cent from $83.9 million to $137.1 million, while the number of applicants has remained relatively stable.

"The escalating costs, for no apparent improvement in outcomes, indicate clearly that the Family Court is not as effective and efficient as it should be," Mr Power said on Tuesday.

"A culture change is needed to encourage separating parents to resolve matters at the earliest opportunity, and before the conflict becomes entrenched in court."

Mr Power says the government's vision for the Family Court is one in which:

  • Vulnerable people and children are protected and prioritised;
  • Access is well managed without unnecessary litigation;
  • Processes are simple, clear, consistent and certain;
  • Personal responsibility is emphasised and costs are met by users , where appropriate;
  • Decisions are logical, workable and durable, and
  • The system is affordable to taxpayers.

Mr Power has released a discussion document on proposed changes, with public submissions welcomed until February 29.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [6]

Brendan
20 Sep 2011 10:51p.m.

The issue with the Family Court - particularly Nelson Family Court in my case, is that they promote one thing, but then deliver another thing entirely. The Family Court promotes that people can self litigate, yet the reality of it is, is that in that instance, if you walk into Nelson Family Court you could be prejudiced, and offered nothing but a loss, even though its supposed to be there to protect the children and Families. Well they havnt protected either me or my son. The court staff often find it difficult to answer simple questions or provide simple advice, even though they are obliged to according to the ministry of justices guide to dealing with self litigants.This can make it feel like its all designed around Lawyers and their employment, as opposed to the interests of self litigants. I would not be surprised to know of other men in Nelson who've had the exact same treatment. I thought Family court staff would have COMPASSION as an important personality trait to gain successful employment there. However I do appreciate this may simply not be in their employment contract. I certainly dont vote National or Act but Simon Powell said some interesting things about the Family Court today Id have to agree with. People need to be aware that the Family Court process can end up being a huge costly experience, and youll potentially end up selling your house to finance it,because the possibility of that being an outcome was never explained ever, and that one would be better just to be told the justice system isnt available to you and try to deal with it alone at home, when the intention in the first place, was to get some support & protection to strengthen my parenting. Hugely disappointing self litigating, firstly against a lawyer that knows technicality and process and directs proceedings in a direction just to Win, rather than have an Inner Sense of whats best for all concerned, including Children . Physcological Abuse has happened and thats simply the truth

dad4justice
20 Sep 2011 9:30p.m.

I was the unfortunate victim of false allegations made to the family court. The resulting litigation meandered on for nearly ten years costing the country a lot of money. The leeches in the family court feasted on the family file number and sucked the life out of my family. Well done you scumbags. The family court is a gender bias sinister place where the truth does not matter. The family court teaches kids how to lie. Sorry kids but the bent judges are so full of hate and venom. Destroy the family court before it stuffs up more kids and paternal grandmothers! RIP Mum.

katrina
20 Sep 2011 8:33p.m.

I agree Erin. I have a friend going through the same thing with his wife. She changes her mind on everything all the time and just keeps dragging things out with her legal aid while he has paid out thousands in legal fees. There needs to be a time limit and legal aid limit to prevent this dragging on. And to force people to result things in a timely manner otherwise it is detrimental to the kids.

Steve Taylor
20 Sep 2011 6:30p.m.

Where is the Consumer Representative on the Family Court Review Panel? The role of the service consumers voice being privileged in the process of receiving formal service delivery is a critical factor in the success or otherwise of a particular intervention, and this factor is especially important to consider in the context of the Family Court Review, when individuals and families have been so dramatically affected by the process, sometimes to the point of self-harm, suicide, and murder.

eddie
20 Sep 2011 5:41p.m.

NOOO, this can't be correct, National are fixing it...NOOO Labour will do it better, ohhh wait they didn't, bugger!

Erin
20 Sep 2011 4:46p.m.

You want to mention the waste of money this is costing & I want to mention I have been going through the Family courts for 10 yrs, the whole time my ex has been claiming legal aid but yet not once EVER attended the counselling sessions (which would have helped) while I attened all ! Yet 10yrs later this man still gets legal aid ??? No wonder it is just money going nowhere & 10yrs on we are still in & out of court ! My lawyers bill is WORTHLESS & a total waste of hard earned $$$ !!!

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio