• Full Story

‘Fast-track’ teaching scheme to launch

Print

Sun, 22 Jan 2012 2:15p.m.

Auckland University and Teach First NZ have announced a six-week teaching course

Auckland University and Teach First NZ have announced a six-week teaching course

Six weeks training could be enough to put some teachers in front of classes in low decile schools.

Teach First NZ and Auckland University are developing a programme which will recruit 20 people next month who already have degrees to a programme which will train them for six weeks.

Those who graduate from the programme would be placed in low-decile secondary schools and in subject areas where teachers are in short supply.

"The course is condensed, so what you would get on a year-long course can be achieved in six weeks," University of Auckland's dean of education, Graeme Aitken told the Herald on Sunday.

"A year-long course has a lot of non-contact time, when trainees are out in schools."

Teach First's website says it is a non-profit organisation aiming to cut education inequality. Its students give a two-year commitment to teach in low-decile secondary schools.

Teach First chief executive Shaun Sutton, who took part in a similar scheme in Britain, said they wanted to attract people who understand socio-economic realities.

"We want to diversify the pool of graduates and hope to get Maori and Pasifika applicants."

Post Primary Teachers' Association president Robin Duff was concerned there may be tensions between teachers with standard training and those from the Teach First scheme, which he called "a fast-track course".

"It costs a lot of money to take part in a year-long training programme; fast track students are being paid while they train."

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Jan 2012 07:17p.m.

Chris wrote:

Makes sense - the current turnover of teachers is so high, why waste time training them? The sooner they get started, the sooner they'll see how crap the job has become, and the sooner they can quit and move on to something else!

Pity we can't sell our schools off to the Chinese as well.

26 Jan 2012 06:00p.m.

key wrote:

As well as the obvious absurdity of such an approach , low decile kids get shit teachers as well.Putting petrol on the fire to put it out.

23 Jan 2012 10:04p.m.

Tanya wrote:

Sorry to go on again but i do need to add one more thing and that is we all deserve a chance to get into a school and teach if we have sacrificed our time to study for 3 years and for some it is longer. considering we HAVE to work for 2 years to become fully registered maybe they should look at how the system works now. i mean why cant there be room made in schools for graduates when they finish their studies. or could they not break between when students graduate and the next intake. or could they not shorten the 2 year registration, so when we become fully registered we can move away and live somewhere better. there are plenty of us that graduated this year and are stuck with what to do, i am already considering working somewhere else until i find a job. Help everyone please :) thank you for listening haha (reading) haha :)

23 Jan 2012 09:35p.m.

Tanya wrote:

I agree with what everyone is saying on here. And like Alan we are a one income family of 4 and it is getting harder, getting this degree meant i could earn a second income and we could move to a better house that isn't making our kids sick every winter, it would take some pressure off my partner who has been supporting me while i studied (with no fuss of course). And with this programme i feel like the 3 years i studied, taking me away from family time is going to be a waste of time. If you met me and interviewed me you would see i am so ready to teach the children in our schools, i have relieved in a low decile school while waiting for my registration and i thrived at the school, i can see that if i was given the chance to help some of these kids i know i would make a difference, but what kind of chance do i have when every application gets declined then they make programmes like the one in question. again the University does not prepare you for this! some schools i have been in i really question the quality of teachers, i have seen some horrible teachers and i wonder why are they not looking at that side of things. It seems like i am moaning a lot but i just dont think Teach First NZ and Auckland University are taking care of everyone. I understand their reasons to want maori and pasifika applicants but i really do not think that is fair when everyone who has graduated or everyone who is experienced is just wanting the chance to work, and in a job they know they want, they will love and they will be good at.

23 Jan 2012 07:19a.m.

moral outraage wrote:

Yes @ most of you commenting here. Top marks do not indicate student rapport abilities or any particular teaching skill. More questions . @ Tania who appears to be highly articulate and have an inquiring mind that lends itself so well to primary school teaching, there is a genuine teacher shortage, why is she not being snapped up? Why is this experimental scheme being rolled out in South Aucks? All the dangerous social medical experiments are put in the hospitals and GP services and back fire in that region. This is a social ticking time bomb that is showing signs of detonation.

23 Jan 2012 01:45a.m.

Ana wrote:

How can you cut education inequality when you put poorly trained teachers in low socio economic schools? Doesn't that just contribute to the problem rather than solve it.

23 Jan 2012 12:43a.m.

Katy wrote:

As stated in another comment, there are many fully qualified teachers some with years of experience, looking for jobs. Putting 6 week trained teachers in low decile schools is suicide for them. The children in the low decile schools do not deserve just some quickly trained 'this is all we can offer' hand offs. I am surprised that the Education system would agree on such a radically stupid idea. This cries out a lack of care and respect to the children, teachers and schools.

22 Jan 2012 11:21p.m.

Alan wrote:

There is not a lack of teachers. I work at a good school where we had more than 120 applicants for the positions we advertised. We are unfortunately stuck with a deluded government that pays at least 10000 dollars less than our Western neighbours and thinks that teachers should work for the 'love of teaching', I am supporting my family on a single income and at some stage they have to come first... believe it or not Mr Key... they further criticise our intellect and education and are now releasing a 6 week training scheme, a great way to improve the standard of teachers ... That will make the 5 years I spent completing my qualifications (4 year bachelors degree and one year post grad) insignificant surely.

22 Jan 2012 03:37p.m.

Michael wrote:

What Shaun Sutton doesn't tell you is that this scheme didn't work in the UK, or in the US, or in Australia, and it won't work here.

22 Jan 2012 03:32p.m.

Tanya wrote:

I am wondering if there is such a shortage for teachers why is it so hard for me to get a job. I have completed 3 years of study to get my bachelors of education degree and yet every job i apply for, mostly low decile they do not want beginning teachers, so how short are they? All the beginning teachers need to start somewhere so we can complete our 2 year registration and start earning that second income which is very important for some families but we are not getting our chance which the university does not prepare you for. They make it sound all wonderful getting this degree but dont seem to mention that when it comes time to apply for the job, you will need to compete with the year before's graduates, experienced teachers wanting new jobs and the graduates from my cohort, manukau and the graduates from epsom. and now they will choose only 20 graduates and i hate to say it but will be a random 20 or will be 20 that are A++ students, i would really like to know the answer to that one! There are some graduates who are not A++ students but will make fantastic teachers if given the chance.