Fay consortium's Crafar offer isn't going away

Print

Wed, 15 Feb 2012 6:01p.m.

The High Court says the OIO failed to consider a Crafar sale to a local buyer

The High Court says the OIO failed to consider a Crafar sale to a local buyer

By Tony Field

The 16 Crafar dairy farms are no longer the Chinese farms.

The High Court has ordered the Government to reconsider its decision approving their sale to foreign owners.

The decision follows a legal challenge by a group of farmers and iwi, led by Sir Michael Fay.

They argued, successfully, that the Overseas Investment Office had overstated the benefits of selling the farms to a Chinese firm.

The High Court's decision is a slap in the face for the Government and a victory for Sir Fay’s consortium.

Consortium spokesman Alan MacDonald says they are really pleased that the High Court decision has confirmed “our view that there was no economic benefit, or additional economic benefit, to come out of this transaction”.

“We have always felt that it was not in the best economic interests of New Zealanders,” says Mr MacDonald.

Two government ministers, Maurice Williamson and Jonathan Coleman, signed off on the sale last month after the deal was recommended by the OIO.

However, the High Court says the OIO failed to consider whether the Chinese buyers would bring any more economic benefit than if the farms were sold to a local buyer.

The decision left the Prime Minister under attack in Parliament.

Labour leader David Shearer asked how Prime Minister John Key can express confidence in the ministers when the judge “roped in paragraph 57 that the error was not a mere technicality”, and the economic benefits caused by the overseas investment were “materially overstated?”

Mr Key says that is the opinion of the judge, “just before everybody gets a little excited here”.

“The OIO will have to go back and reconsider the decision in light of the ruling and its possible the OIO will come up with the same recommendations and ministers will continue to accept it,” says Mr Key.

It is a setback for the Government that the opposition has leapt on.

Green Party co-leader Russel Norman says it is real progress.

“It means that New Zealand buyers of land get a fair go. In the past they didn’t get an even chance because overseas buyers were put at the head of the queue.”

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters says it is a failure “to do their duty by their ministerial post, by the law and by their country”.

“They spend nine months, put it beyond the election, make the wrong decision the OIO did, and then two docile ministers rubber stamped it.”

The consortium led by Sir Fay is also still in the running.

“The legal team and the buying group are considering the full implications of the judgment and having a close look at it,” says Mr MacDonald. “But our offer has never gone away.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

15 Feb 2012 09:40p.m.

fish face wrote:

I'd like to see the Crown purchase this land and use it for Maori land settlements - bring economic benefits truly to New Zealand, including Maori.

15 Feb 2012 09:17p.m.

Jack Smith wrote:

The Government only considered the benefits to sell the land to overseas, they didn't count the negativity of these transaction. Why people oversea prefer New Zealand diary products? Because they can trust our New Zealnd as a Great Brand. Some Dairy Products manufacture overseas had terrible reputation. If these kind of people get involved in our diary industry who is gong to trust us? Who is going to trust out New Zealand Brand. How much we are gong to lost if we lost our reputation? Who is going to pay for this, for the lost of our nation? It will be much much more than what we can get from this transaction.

15 Feb 2012 08:41p.m.

cyril wrote:

It should be that you should have to be a New Zealand citizen to own land in New Zealand. Rent it if you are a foreigner no problem but not own it.

15 Feb 2012 08:19p.m.

Ruz wrote:

The consortiun can stay. but as far as I'm concerned Fay can lose himself in the bush.

15 Feb 2012 08:15p.m.

Michael Franks wrote:

It is pretty basic thinking that if they had given a lease like they did with Hong Kong then it would have been better. The OIO must be and the National party pretty arrogant to think that it is a bad deal for NZ. Or just plain thick ? Maurice Williamson was put on the block by John Campbell last night but really that was what John was getting at , are they thick. The basic thing is before the milk went to fonterra to process and sell on to the global markets incl, china. But remember if they have access to the milk all processing etc goes straight to China . Not forgetting the first bidder May Wang who's Dynasty Group which was a huge farce leaving huge debts to New Zealand businesses , still has her office manager Malia Poulua ( last name ? reporters do some digging ) , on the directors board of the Milk processing plant sold to May Wang and Natural Dairy NZ . Even though Wang is on charges of fraud in Hong Kong along with Jack Chen. I am sure that she will show up again somewhere as the immigration dept let's her travel to and from NZ and Hong kong any other kiwi would be stopped as it is unlawful for bankrupts to leave the country.

15 Feb 2012 07:24p.m.

phil goldsmith wrote:

This land sould stay in nz the government buys this land then every new zealander will be a owner.

15 Feb 2012 07:12p.m.

carolyn bruce wrote:

Thank God that some one with clout came thru,overseas investment is fine as long as it doesnt go in huge blocks to a magor foreign power,think of Fiji loesing out to Indian investment,are we third world?