Fiji hoteliers question New Zealand govt's safety warnings

Print

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:00a.m.

Tourists and resort owners in Fiji are questioning travel advisories issued by governments like New Zealand's.

They claim the travel warnings are causing unnecessary harm to Fijian businesses and workers and insist the country is safe to visit.

 It has never been cheaper to holiday in Fiji - with cut price flights and accommodation deals, along with a recently devalued dollar.

Some have dubbed the deals a "holiday in hell", following the recent upheavals in Fiji.

But those still choosing Nadi as a holiday destination say they've seen little sign of the promised trouble.

“That's what we'd been warned. Travel agent had said you know don't bring anything valuable, don't take photos at the airport, that kind of thing. But there was no security there,” says New Zealand tourist Sue Scutter.

Australian tourist patricia Smith said authorities are more concerned with journalists than holidaying families.

Even on the streets of Suva, there is little evidence of a military presence, certainly no police with guns on every corner.

But tourists say there is an uneasy tension here amongst locals.

“I think they're not happy about it at all, but they're all too afraid to stand up, because pretty much if you stand up and say something then you're going to get taken off by the military and dealt with pretty much,” says New Zealand tourist Michael Ver Berne.

Commodore Bainimarama was this week honoured by the Fijian president for "services to his country and humanity".

That is despite muzzling free speech, and tearing up the constitution.

Tourist numbers are well down though across Fiji. At this Nadir resort ex-pat Philip Buckleton is blaming countries like New Zealand for his half-empty hotel.

“The negative impact of travel advisories have virtually stopped business, or brought business to a standstill,” he says.

Mr Buckleton says he is a supporter of Bainimarama’s regime and claims the advisories and media reports are painting a one-sided picture.

The New Zealand government's "safe travel" website lists Fiji as "some risk".

While travel agents say it is up to individuals to decide whether it’s a holiday they're happy to take.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

04 May 2009 11:55a.m.

cherie wrote:

Rubbish.
Lying on a beach in a resort in Fiji is no worse than anywhere else.
So the odd journo gets a biff. Shame eh!! Perhaps they should learn not to be so agressive and learn to tell it like it is and not twist things around to make "news" out of nothing.

01 May 2009 10:33p.m.

Alien wrote:

the fact that people live in fear of speaking out against this govt, the fear of freedom of speech shows that it is not a safe place, and that our govt is rightfully warning people that it is not a safe place.

27 Apr 2009 02:18p.m.

cherie wrote:

Yes I agree there is little if no chance of a tourist getting nailed.
The fact that the country has been taken over by a military ruler has no bearing at the moment on travellers safety, when thsi changes they can up the warning. Throwing the media out also has nothing to do with it.
I'm off to book a holiday over there, can't wait the place will be empty!!

27 Apr 2009 12:52p.m.

Alien wrote:

and why do you agree with the hoteliers Cherie? DO you think that the govts shouldn't warn travellers when going to a a country that has been taken over by a military ruler, where freedom of the press does not exist and where people have been arrested for speaking out against the govt? If a kiwi went there, and something happened to them, it would be the NZ govt fault for not putting out a travel warning telling people of the problems there

27 Apr 2009 11:49a.m.

cherie wrote:

I agree with the Hoteliers.
Our ideas and ideals should not be pressed on others.
I find it amazing that we jump up and down about what is going on in Fiji but yet in a country like Malaysia with it's ISA your husband can head off to work on day be arrested and thrown in jail without being charged and without anyone being told where you are for two years.
If we want to throw our weight around then we should do it with everyone and not be so selective due to trade deals etc

26 Apr 2009 09:28p.m.

Alien wrote:

Fiji hoteliers should perhaps instead of questioning the travel advisories, question the actions of their military ruler which have lead to countries having to issue warnings for the safety of their own citizens.