Concessions revealed on proposed foreshore laws

Print

Sat, 10 Apr 2010 3:52p.m.

The Government will confirm all the Foreshore and Seabed changes by the end of May

The Government will confirm all the Foreshore and Seabed changes by the end of May

By Duncan Garner

The Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson has made some major concessions tonight on the Government's proposals on the foreshore and seabed.

Mr Finlayson has told TV3's The Nation how Maori may be able to build hotels on the foreshore - and stop others from developments unless money changes hands.

The Government is out selling its new proposals for the future of the country's foreshore and seabed.

The current Crown ownership of New Zealand’s beaches antagonises Maori and National wants to put it into what's called “public domain”.

Some iwi will then get the right to seek what's called “Customary Title” - and today on The Nation the Government spelt out what that means.

“[What is customary title?] It's a constrained form of property right it doesn't inhibit public access it's unable to be sold,” says Finlayson.

So we asked Finlayson - could it mean a hapu or iwi awarded Customary title, team up with wealthy investors Chinese investors and build hotels on the foreshore the iwi has title to.

“[Would Maori with customary title be able to get away with that?] Oh yes but they would be subject to the RMA and other pieces of legislation it's not proposed that they have self governing entity.

The proposals also give coastal iwi with customary title major rights to veto developments - like marinas.

Mr Finlayson says like normal business - money could change hands to make sure developments go ahead.

“We'll I’d expect in the normal course of these things there'd be a negotiation,” he says.

Labour stopped Maori going to the court to seek Customary Title in 2004.

National will overturn that - but in a major development Mr Finlayson says iwi should by-pass the courts and prove their case to him personally.

“I'd be much happier to negotiate with people and if these things can be sorted out through negotiations than that's great,” he says.

The controversial 2004 law also vested all minerals around the coastline with the Crown.

National now it appears willing to compromise and hand some minerals back into the hands of Maori with “Customary Title”.

“I can rule out petrol, gold silver uranium I'm prepared to listen to other people about those other minerals,” says Mr Finlayson.

He says he's already talked to Energy Minister Gerry Brownlee about the compromise.

And the Government will confirm all the Foreshore and Seabed changes by the end of May.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Jun 2010 02:52p.m.

nick a wrote:

i wish it surprises me, but i have come to except that this is what the country is now. My concern is the growth to white suprematists groups that is being caused by this govt. Cant really blame whitey for feeling this way as its been proven by maori time and time again that to get what your organisation wants "Get Radical" and absolutly stuff everyone else and what they think and their rights. I think kiwis are slowly starting to relise that they need fire to fight this fire and the respectful, honourable way is getting non maori no where fast except off the beach the forests, lakes and rivers,

12 Apr 2010 04:46p.m.

gerry wrote:

If Maori don't own the seabed and seashore how can they accept money for it and will they pay rates on the land they don't own, how can they veto someone else from building on the seashore if they don't own it. God created it maybe he should own it.
Looks like a new Law is about to be passed behind closed doors, this appears tobe the way of the National Party.

12 Apr 2010 03:18p.m.

LRDONALD wrote:

This seems to be developing into yet another example of special rules for those of the "BROWN" variety- I thought that we had firmly turned our backs on apartheid some years ago but it seems that I was mistaken as the only difference is that the colours have been swapped over ? There is absolutely no way that this apalling state of affairs can be allowed to pass unchallenged even in our apathetic fools paradise..

12 Apr 2010 11:41a.m.

Mini Small wrote:

When it comes to the crunch, no ones own anything. The only owner is the crator himself. He made it possible for everyone to enjoy not just the maori people of NZ. Therefore, thats what it should be. SHARED TO EVERYONE

11 Apr 2010 06:46p.m.

Dan wrote:

Regardless oif the reaction that this journalism provokes the real point is that it is a agreed that it could happen (not something your average NZ farmer could do with his coastal land. I think this could be a very sad thing for coastal NZ the way this thing is progressing.

11 Apr 2010 11:36a.m.

John Robinson wrote:

Funny, this Minister agreed that the Treaty legislation is BAD law, contradictory with equality in one bit and privilege in another. Now he is setting down 'a public domain concept' that is just garbage. These words mean whatever he chooses. AND MOST OF US ARE OUT IN THE COLD. He, he alone, will talk with various racially defined family groups who will be able to mine and build - how on earthy does that allow access. Where is the traditional National Party?

11 Apr 2010 11:31a.m.

Pol wrote:

I'm really disappointed with this piece as it deeks to inflame public opinion. I don't expect such tabloid journalism from TV3. Why chinese investors" why single that ethnig group out? They drawing on Kiwiw love of boats to suggest that "they" could block marinas. Where is the evidence that this will happen?

11 Apr 2010 07:16a.m.

Steve in ChCh wrote:

So, the invaders back in the 18th century (the Maori) knew of ALL the minerals back when they invaded/raped and pillaged huh? What a bloody joke!

Browmlee's compromise? Write a check to get the Maori onto my side. That fixes everything!

10 Apr 2010 10:31p.m.

CIVIL WAR wrote:

Wow i can see this uniting nzlanders. Not only has this bought about xenophobia ( already here just go into town at night) but its ugly twin, exceptionalism.

Enjoy it people.

88

10 Apr 2010 08:57p.m.

katrina wrote:

The foreshore belongs to all New Zealanders, it should remain in the hands of the crown. We all know that Maori will sell out to the highest bidder 1st chance they get.