GM rules not strict enough - report
Tue, 05 Feb 2013 8:49a.m.
Councils are being urged to ban the commercial use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to ensure land-owners and rate payers aren't left with the bill if anything goes wrong.
The Inter-Council Working Party on GMO Risk Evaluation and Management Options, representing all councils in Northland and Auckland, has spent 10 years evaluating regulation of GMOs at local and national government levels.
It is recommending councils prohibit commercial outdoor uses of GMOs, and require Resource Management Act consents for outdoor field trials.
That would require changes to district plans and Auckland's new unitary plan to prohibit the release of GMOs into the environment, and make GMO field trials a "discretionary activity", and therefore subject to strict liability conditions for any environmental or economic harm.
New Zealand is yet to grow any commercial GMO crops.
Convenor Kerry Grundy says the working party found "significant deficiencies" in current regulations.
There is no liability under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act for damage, or any requirement to provide bonds to recover costs.
That means land-owners and councils, not those behind GMO technology, would be left to pick up the cost.
The working party says there is a lack of scientific agreement on the long-term effects of releasing GMOs into the environment, a lack of information on long-term environmental consequences, and uncertainty and disagreement about the economic benefits and costs GMO crops and animals.
"In addition, the potential adverse effects of releasing GMOs into the environment could be significant - including possible major, and long-term, harm," the working party says.
"These effects could be irreversible. Once released to the environment it is, in most instances, impossible to eradicate such organisms."
Councils say they will consider changes to regulation as a result of the report.
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
6/02/2013 12:27:31 p.m.
Mark, Wgtn wrote:
The main application of GM crops is to increase revenue for the manufacturer of the crop. The argument over whether the science is safe or not is a red herring. It's mainly about corporate ownership of DNA.
6/02/2013 12:24:13 a.m.
The Ombudsman estimated 3-4000 people were harmed by the insecticide used on West Auckland between 2002 and 2004. Patents show that the main ingredient of the spray had been genetically modified. Yip, GM sure is safe!
5/02/2013 8:53:25 p.m.
common sense wrote:
they say without GM and modern farming techniques we cant grow enough to frrd ourselves so the argument is pointless if the population continues to grow.
5/02/2013 1:05:46 p.m.
For god's sake, people really don't know jack about GM..!
It's safe! Get over it! Go study biology!
A woman in the United States did a double take when she discovered her cat had given birth to a two-faced kitten.
A major clean-up is underway at a salmon farm in Golden Bay that bore the brunt of another landslide.
The Ministry of Fisheries will begin assessing possible changes to snapper regulations next month.
Fluoride – is it harming or helping us?
Venomous spiders imported from Australia and South Africa are increasing in number here in New Zealand.
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.