3News » Home
Full Story

Gluten-free: healthy choice or expensive fad?

28 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Is gluten-free food really a healthier option or is it just an expensive fad?

Is gluten-free food really a healthier option or is it just an expensive fad?

video
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 7:06p.m.
Organic, GE-free, low cholesterol – these are all buzz words associated with healthy living and healthy food choices.

But what about gluten-free?

How many people think they are gluten intolerant even though they have never actually been tested?

Gluten-free products are often marketed as somehow being better for you and like organic foods, they are more expensive.

So is gluten-free really a healthier choice?

Or are some people just buying into an expensive fad?
 
Dr Vincent Crump, an author and allergy specialist, says people who do not eat gluten but have not been tested for coeliac are "wasting their money".
 
"These products are not cheap and I think it is unfortunate that you are excluding a basic part of your diet for no good reason."
 
Being coeliac is a bit like being pregnant: you are or you are not.
 
For those who are, gluten damages the small intestine and interferes with food absorption in the stomach.
 
Only a blood test and an internal stomach examination can confirm the diagnosis.
 
Before Shanelle Jackson, a coeliac sufferer, tested positive for coeliac she had lost 10kg in weight and was suffering from malnutrition.
 
"At my worst period I was throwing up after every meal, I was sick, it stopped me from going out."
 
Her other symptoms were typically coeliac: abdominal bloating and pain, chronic diarrhoea, vomiting, constipation and weight loss.
 
"Gluten intolerance is a specific disease that you can diagnose by doing specific tests. It is very very unusual to find someone who will have a gluten intolerance and you can't find some objective tests to prove this.," says Dr Crump.
 
"I think there are people who are excluding gluten unnecessarily from their diets."
 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [28]

chris
04 Mar 2011 12:47a.m.

i totally agree. it is just selected few who r allergic to gluten and lactose for that matter yet theres some huge fuss abt these 2. if ur body functions alright u dont need to buy all these gluten-free products

Peanut Toejamawich
25 Oct 2010 8:58p.m.

Does anybody even read these long as stories, btw who likes my name? Peter, Do you?

Peter Tomjanovich
08 Oct 2010 5:59a.m.

I think you folks need to relax just a wee bit. I doubt this doctor would have any issue with what you are saying: you know your bodies and it's obvious, you shouldn't have gluten. But guess what, you're the select few that happen to have an issue with gluten. The vast majority of people don't, and he's merely saying to them: don't waste your time and money avoiding perfectly good food because someone else made you feel like it's a healthy idea. If you have a problem with gluten, you know it and should act accordingly. But I think this doctor's advice is essential for the many folks out there that are stressing about a non-issue.

linda mccutcheon
04 Jun 2010 12:54p.m.

I was just reading your terribly misinformed article.

First of all, I have Dermatitis Herpetiformis, which means I get a rash on my ass if I eat gluten. I don't really need a test to clue me in. It's a form of celiac disease, which is hell to live with, when you don't know what is causing the itching.

Secondly, if I were to get any of the tests, which have been used in the past to determine if someone has celiac disease the chance of them being false negative is very great, so why would I bother. The rash on my ass is pretty darn accurate.

People like you who think you are so superior because you happen to be healthy are not doing those of us with major immune disorders a favour. Not everyone with celiac disease gets a rash. I am actually one of the lucky ones. Most get painful nonstop diarrhea, which saps the life out of them.

The reality is there is no good test to determine if someone has celiac disease, and if you have found a doctor that claims that there is, they are lying. The only accurate test is complete and total abstention from wheat, rye and barley and that is almost impossible to do without checking yourself into a gluten free retreat with experts on gluten avoidance.

Gluten free means no lipstick or chapstick, it means only a few toothpastes are safe, it means don't use latex gloves because they may be lined with flour, it means don't lick envelopes, it means don't allow anyone else to prepare your food, it means stay away from anything with the ingredients hydrolized vegetable protein, seasoning and starch and a whole host of other strange hidden sources. I could go on.

It is nearly impossible for the average person to go gluten free without getting a degree in nutrition sciences. So in your humble opinion, how on earth is one to ever be really sure that their health problems are or are not gluten related.

Have a nice day.

Linda McCutcheon





Jenna
19 Mar 2010 3:35a.m.

I've finally gotta say it - doctors make me sick - both mentally and physically. Such arrogance as expressed by the individual in this article is commonplace. They seem to think we are all complete idiots. As if we have no awareness of what makes our bodies feel better or worse.

Why should people undergo risky, unpleasant, and invasive biopsies which recent research has shown to be far from foolproof, just to be told by a frigging paternalistic doctor 'Yes I'm afraid you are gluten intolerant' or you're not when they happen to biopsy a portion of the gut wall which hasn't yet been affected by gluten damage? When, all along, a few well-conducted tests or food challenges at home will quickly establish what foods make us better or worse.

If our eczema or asthma or whatever goes away, if we are free from hideous abdominal pain, gas, bloating, raging diarrhoea, and sickness when we stop eating bread and other wheat-containing items then it doesn't take an Einstein to deduce the obvious.

My really vicious symptoms cleared up really fast after cutting out gluten-containing foods. Yes it worked like a miracle, but your doctor is much more likely to either send you away with a diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome or arrange for you to be tested for bowel cancer. Oh my. They are way behind the eight-ball I'm afraid - head in sand, tunnel vision.

We don't need permission from doctors to trial a gluten free diet. I've been told that in Italy gluten intolerance is so rife that every baby is now mandatorily tested for it at birth. They've seen the extensive damage to children caused by years of eating gluten. All that pasta is very delicious, but it may indeed be one's worst enemy.

I've personally had too many years suffering the consequences of medical misadventure or put more honestly 'medical blundering and incompetence' that I'd no sooner risk further invasive procedures than fly to the moon. It's each person's decision to make for themselves.




Betsy
21 Dec 2009 5:07a.m.

I eat gluten-free foods because I can't eat wheat, and gluten-free means no wheat. But I didn't get that diagnosed professionally. I don't need a doctor to tell me that my insides burst open and bleed when I eat more than a small amount of wheat. I've played guinea pig on myself enough times in the past month. I know what's up with my body. Don't eat wheat --> Bleeding goes away; Eat wheat --> Bleeding comes back. And each time it takes 1-2 weeks to get back to "no bleeding," so I'm pretty tired of experimenting. If not eating wheat makes me feel good ... I don't need a doctor to tell me what's up. I can't get a celiac test in this country anyway. But I might get an allergy test one of these days. When I'm feeling rich.

Ingrid Broekhals
10 Dec 2009 9:40a.m.

I discovered my gluten intolerance by accident. I was on a kayaking/ camping trip a few years ago,lasting just over a week and so did not take bread in my food supply. I ate mosty fruit and veg and sea food.Having been covered in eczema since childhood, suddenly after day 5 all the eczema miraculously disappeared. Who needs a doctor's confirmation that you need to make dietry changes? The other accompanying symptoms I also lived with, when eating wheat and gluten were all listed in a coeliac book I read recently. These ghastly symptoms return every time I can't resist a good old pie or feed of pasta etc. I hope most of us are in tune enough with our own bodies to make intelligent decisions for ourselves. It's getting so much easier to purchase a variety of gluten free luxury groceries but there has always been plenty of natural alternatives.

Ashleigh
02 Dec 2009 9:38a.m.

Roz - "Why wait for a positive biopsy before adoping a healthy lifestyle and being well??" Wait, because if a person eats gluten free before the get tested or confirmed it will test negative. My doctor told me he thought I had celiac but wouldn't allow me to eat gluten free until I completed all the testing. The absence of gluten makes the test inaccurate.

Sarah
29 Nov 2009 6:23a.m.

I would love to put the good doctor in a locked room with my undiagnosed family and a few mince pies then let him tell us it is all in our heads - if he survived!

Jennifer
26 Nov 2009 4:01p.m.

After a long period of ill health and endless invasive and expensive tests in search of a cause, I removed gluten from my diet and experienced massive and continued improvement in health. A trial return to eating gluten resulted in return of symptoms. I have un-diagnosed intolerance, but no doubts. Cost is not an issue as I do not need substitutes. There is a massive amount of naturally gluten free food available - it is a wonderfully light, fresh, varied and very healthy diet containing very few processed foods. Extra vitality and nil weight gain are added bonuses :-)

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion