Goff: Reversing $400M early childhood cuts a 'priority'

Print

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 6:15p.m.

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA file)

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA file)

By Duncan Garner

Labour has promised to restore $400 million of funding cuts to early childhood centres that affect parents from tomorrow.

But Prime Minister John Key has once again had a swipe at Labour leader Phil Goff, saying the cost of his policies do not stack up.

Hundreds of early childhood education centres are expected to raise their fees tomorrow, a result of the Government's $400 million funding cuts.

Labour says parents will pay more.

“We think the average is $25-35 a week extra,” says Mr Goff.

Mr Key says only centres that insist on employing 100 percent qualified teachers are affected.

He told 3 News prices would not go up.

“I don't think so, no. A lot of the sector is totally unaffected,” he says.

So Labour today promised to reverse the $400 million in cuts if it wins the election.

“It will be a priority for us, it's not only an investment in our children's future but our future. If they’re not in education they won't succeed in the future.”

Mr Goff's fresh pledge of $400 million comes on top of his $1.3 billion tax cut last week - a total of 1.7b in just seven days.

3 News asked how he is going to pay for all this.

“It will come from the sort of economic growth we expect to get in the economy,” says Mr Goff.

Mr Key says Mr Goff's promises are unaffordable.

“It means New Zealand will be downgraded under Phil Goff, he's writing cheques he simply can't afford to cash.”

Labour is working on details of its tax policy including a new tax on foreign money coming into the country, but Mr Goff is vague on details.

“As I said I’m not going into those details now.”

So Mr Goff is having no trouble spending money, but the pressure is on him to say how he is going to pay for his promises.

Mr Key faces pressure too - after two years of heavy borrowing, including giving generous tax cuts he now says we must get on top of debt.

He could have chosen to do that much earlier of course.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

09 Feb 2011 12:42a.m.

Jonny wrote:

Labour . " The Average Kiwi " I like !

05 Feb 2011 04:40p.m.

Valeria wrote:

@Greg: I completely agree with you, New Zealand as a nation cannot AFFORD to deal with multi-billion dollar Maori claims, both Waitangi claims and benefit payments. Come on people, let's work together, as New Zealanders, and get this country out of this (financial) mess. Taking on $300 million a week in new debt is not sustainable, who will ever pay for that? I'm guessing the government wants to "outgrow" this debt by letting inflation go through the roof, but that's not sustainable either. If a business was run the way New Zealand is run as a country it would've been bankrupted by its lenders a long time ago.

03 Feb 2011 09:52p.m.

Clarke wrote:

Katrina I have seen you make so many statements on this site now, and from what I can tell you are the one making excuses for Key.

We should have been saving and trying to fix the economy from as soon as National took power, instead Key took everything from the poor... slashed benefits, made them harder to get, raised ACC levels, increased gas prices, increased GST.

The amount of money that National is taking from indirect taxation is more than what it ever gave to tax payers.

And now Key is promising 3 more years of hardship and pain, after its three years of generous gifts for his wealthy buddies that he now wants to sell the family jewels to pay for.

John Key should be out at the end of the year. many of us will rejoice.

Take back the tax cuts from the rich fools who caused the recession in the first place.

02 Feb 2011 11:46p.m.

Greg wrote:

Simple fact is that since the maori claims have had to be dealt with, NZ and it`s economy is dying weather it be Labour or National,,,i`m certain that both these govts would sooner have that treaty extortion money to pay for health/education/infrastructure and creating JOBS....I much prefer Labour over the greedy nats who are just gamblers!.

02 Feb 2011 08:26p.m.

Brent wrote:

Charles you seem to have moved your argument, You said Labour left no debt, Yet the more I look the more I fined. In fact from 2005 the Debt was climbing, student loans are costing 1 billion a year With 10 billion in 2008, Your argument on the Keys promising 100 billion, were did you read this the standard, sound like your reading part storeys.

02 Feb 2011 06:08p.m.

charles wrote:

brent and pete, another two prepared to hold john keys hand
while the ship sinks. piracy means he must walk the plank.
he has booked up billions of debt and the one most seem to have missed,is the $875 million he is borrowing for the missile for the frigate to protect our fisheries. the russians are taking 100's tons already,(legally)maori quota.
then there is the $100 billion,yes that's right billion nz must pay for nationals emmissions trading costs.
sell the assets and what else. get real get these morons out.

02 Feb 2011 06:43a.m.

Brent wrote:

Charles, Cullen said march 2008 , We do have a debt, and described it as growing, Mind you he said there was 10 billion in the coffers, turn out he got that wrong, 10 billion debt,

01 Feb 2011 11:08p.m.

Pete wrote:

Ok so so far Phil Goffs economic plan is spend...spend...spend again... Big promises, few facts. Typical.

01 Feb 2011 06:11p.m.

charles wrote:

chereie, indue joe is quite right,labour paid back $30 billion of nationals debt over the 9 years in power.
john key inherited $0 gov't debt. john key has admitted to
iheritting a sound fical position and bill english under pressure also admitted this to the house. labour debt is
a load of rubbish. thanks to labour we have billions floating around in kiwi saver, the cullen fund and finance
houses will tell you ,without this money nz would have been down graded long ago.

01 Feb 2011 12:31p.m.

Cherie wrote:

Hindu joe you need to get your facts right. Key did not inherit $0 debt.
You are simply wrong.
Do some study on the subject instead of throwing nasty jibes around first.
How on earth Goff thinks we can pay for all these bribes is beyond me.
Our international rating will fall through the floor.
Nat needed to stop the out of control Govt spending. In hard times tough decisions have to be made and thankfuly Nat are doing that.
Goff is pulling on every heart string he can find. Next he will grease up the students with more bribes.
He is spending money we do not have.