Goff officially steps down, no replacement yet

Print

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 3:01p.m. UPDATED 4:29PM

Phil Goff addresses media

Phil Goff addresses media

By Angela Beswick and Lloyd Burr

Phil Goff has confirmed he is stepping down as Labour Party leader, effective December 13.

Watch the video for Mr Goff’s press conference

Mr Goff made the announcement at a lengthy caucus meeting today and deputy leader Annette King also announced that she will resign at the same Mr Goff does.  

The decision to step down follows Saturday’s election where Labour gained just 27 percent of the party vote and lost nine MPs in the process – their worst result since 1993.

In an interview with media on Sunday Mr Goff said he took full responsibility for the disappointing result and he reiterated that again today, adding that the election was lost over the last three years, not the last four weeks.

“We all feel the hurt of an election defeat that we didn’t want and the loss of support….[and] I take responsibility for the loss, I am the leader.”

Mr Goff’s resignation is not immediate which, he says, will give the caucus time to consider who should succeed him – and a number of members have put up their hands.

Labour MPs David Parker, David Cunliffe, Grant Robertson, Nanaia Mahuta and David Shearer have all expressed interest in taking over leadership of the party.

Mr Parker, with Mr Robertson as his deputy, is understood to be favoured combination.

Mr Goff says he “thinks it’s great that we have a range of people putting themselves forward” to take over the leader and deputy leader positions.  

“They will first take the step of talking to their caucus colleagues to ascertain the level of support they might have for one or other of those positions,” he says.

Mr Shearer told reporters he has the “killer instinct” needed for the job of Prime Minister and heading into the caucus meeting this morning, Mr Cunliffe said the Labour Party had to “reconnect” with its base.

“There are certainly messages for us getting the lowest result since the 30s. We need to go back to our party organisation because the future is a better partnership with communities across the country,” Mr Cunliffe said

However the pending leadership change could be set to divide the Labour Party, rather than unite it.

Newstalk ZB this afternoon reported party numbers to be fairly evenly split between Mr Cunliffe and Mr Parker, with the party’s old guard lobbying hard for Mr Parker to succeed Mr Goff.

Party members feel Mr Cunliffe was disloyal to Mr Goff and therefore doesn’t deserve to take over from him.

Regardless of the in-house fighting, Mr Goff is optimistic about Labour’s chances to come-back at the next election.

“I believe the Labour Party can and will fight back and I want to pledge whoever might be leader or deputy leader of the Labour Party that they will have my full support.

“[It’s] active support from wherever I sit in the House, which won’t be a frontbench position,” he says.

Being on the backbench doesn’t worry Mr Goff, who says he is “very relaxed about the prospect of going from an 80-100 hour week, probably down to a sixty hour week – that should be quite refreshing,” he says.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30 Nov 2011 07:52a.m.

Mike wrote:

Whenever Labour hits trouble, what does it do, it has it most senior members jump the sinking ship - like rats!

This time only 2 senior members anounced they are steping down. Goff has anounced he is steping down but still wants to be a politician which says he has more backbone than the previous rats who bailed on the Labour party in the couple of days after the 2008 election.

I dont think Goff was ever really up to being a party leader and he was put up as the sacrificial lamb. Labour also needs to be careful as the public has made its oppinion of several possible leaders they had been grooming like their far-left unionist.

Other parties did some house cleaning before the election for good/bad. Labour chose to do nothing and look where it got them? No leadership is bad for any party.

The greens made use of the shipping disaster. Probably more % of voters who vote 'green' probably turned up to vote while mainstream voters didn't turn up since the media had been talking up a national win for over a year.

If anyone didn't vote, they can't complain about the result nor government as they are partly responsible by not voting. Thats democracy, which Labour doesn't stand for considering how it allows its memebers no freedom to vote on issues. As Main parties go, Labour is amoung the least democratic in NZ and run more like a dictatorship, or a priviledged committee. Labour talks about everyone else being an old-boys club, yet for such actions they are the worst party in NZ. Take Labours using the RNZAF to fly a suspected criminal from justice out of the USA because they couldn't use commercial flights and were linked to the highest levels of the Labour party. Or Labours direction to ACC/Kiwsaver to invest in Maddof which lost NZ billions of the almost $30 billion lost by those 2 organisations just prior to 2008 election as Labour finance team members received 'incentives' from Maddof. What Labour leader hopefuls were involved in the Madoff disaster?

29 Nov 2011 09:24p.m.

Mrbeir wrote:

Theyre all political scientists that lot an elitist group . A power base that's dissolved . There was no substance but it took a decade to flounder .

29 Nov 2011 06:15p.m.

cyril wrote:

You cant tell me a politician as experianced as goff didnt know rhis was going to happen when he took the helm 3 years ago. Basically he took the job no one wanted to hold the party together while they sorted there shit. We now will have to wait and see in 3 years if it worked.

29 Nov 2011 05:00p.m.

wondering wrote:

Cunliffe could be considered to have brought down the Labour party this election by feeding rumours of a leadership coup and lack of confidence in Labour hierarchy and policy. Is he working for Key and Joyce. He seems cut from the same cloth.

29 Nov 2011 03:33p.m.

anne wrote:

A total clean out of the old guard,shearer and mahuta,would lead the labour party back to its base,to install cunliffe,parker or robertson will not do anything and nothing will change.