Goff scared into a 'Tiz' by two bloggers

Print

Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:33a.m.

Phil Goff in an entirely made up interview with Whale Oil and David Farrar

Phil Goff in an entirely made up interview with Whale Oil and David Farrar

By Patrick Gower

Labour and Phil Goff got scared into defusing the Tizard bomb because of two right-wing bloggers.

That means Goff is scared of the blogs.

Yes, you heard me right: Goff's office (aka the 'Goffice') and the Labour Party hierarchy decided their Judith Tizard strategy because of what they read on Kiwiblog and Whaleoil.

That means Labour is scared of the blogs.

The way Judith Tizard has been treated by the Labour Party and others is a disgrace. In all of this one thing has been forgotten: Tizard is a human being. She is a nice lady from Ponsonby - not an ogre. I had a cup of tea with her the other day and it was lovely.

I am still in disbelief that this became such an issue that it led to the extraordinary scene of a list MP placed number 38 on the list issuing their decision on whether they return or not on live television.

I doubt we will ever see that again.

But Labour made all this happen. They bullied, poked, pushed and hurt Judith Tizard just so they didn't annoy the right wing blogs.

I know its fashionable to be down on 'the Tiz'. I know everyone is going to attack me for defending 'the Tiz'. But make no mistake here. I am saying: LAY. OFF. JUDITH. TIZARD.

Because its not like anyone in Labour is piping up. They have cut her loose and don't care about the decades of service she gave the party.

She is now nothing to Labour.

Bullying has been in the news a lot lately. The Tizard scenario reminds me of Judith in the playground getting ganged up on.

She sees her own family, Labour. She sees Goff - an older brother if you will let me extend the analogy. She expects their help. They are her flesh and blood after all. But instead, they turn a blind eye. They let her be hurt. It is humiliating for her.

Labour caved into pressure from the blogs. The right wing blogs effectively ran Labour's strategy on this. Labour has gone soft on this.

It all started when the blogs raised the "Tizard-bomb" back in the Mt Albert by-election.

It got called the Tizard effect and eventually the Tizard bomb.

It was mischief-making in the extreme from the get-go.

The very wise Matt McCarten even called them out. But Goff took the bait.

Goff then went to extraordinary lengths to make sure a list MP didn't fill the spot and set off the Tizard bomb.

That meant Phil Twyford hit the cutting room floor. (Twyford's since spent the past two years pulling his map of Auckland out of the glovebox and going to places he's never heard of as he searched for a possie.)

Goff went all the way to Baghdad and pulled his mate David Shearer out of the Green Zone just so the Tizard bomb didn't go off.

There's been machinations and fears within Labour ever since that Tizard would come back.

It became an issue. But would it have really been the end of the world if Tizard came back - either now or at  the time?

She lost her seat - the Labour prize of Auckland Central. Well, sorry, lots of Labour MPs lost seats. In fact, Goff lost his seat to Gilbert Myles back in the day.

She set up a copyright law that was hated by the internet community. Well, Goff helped set up Rogernomics, and that was hated by quite a few people too.

She was a reminder of the past. Well, Goff shouldn't go there quite frankly. She was closely aligned with Helen Clark - well what about Maryan Street and Ruth Dyson? They are on Goff's front bench. And so what anyway?

Labour is a broad church - there are all kinds of people in there. What has Judith in particular done wrong?

So she was ineffectual. Sorry to break this to the public, but there are lots of useless MPs in Parliament - on both sides.

And as Tim Watkin points out at Pundit, its not like she never achieved anything.

So why was it such an issue for Labour? If you are a Christchurch casino worker who has lost your job you don't care if Judith Tizard comes in at number 38 on the list. But Labour thought it was an issue, because the right wing blogs told them it was an issue.

Goff could have let Judith back in way back at the Mt Albert by-election or at least not been so dismissive of her. During our cup of tea last weekend, she told me she felt they were mean to her during the Mt Albert saga. If Labour had been nicer then, maybe she wouldn't have pulled the latest tricks.

Instead, it's become an issue. If she'd come back it would have been another test of Goff's leadership, etc, etc.

So they had to manipulate the 2008 party list that was signed off by their party.

Goff even had to work together with Andrew Little (After the "President... Schmesident" debacle in the Hughes affair) to put the pressure on Tizard.

Forget all this talk about respecting decisions. Tizard's got it right when she said Goff sounded like he was swallowing dead rats saying this. She's on record with me saying he doesn't like her and she doesn't like him.

She would have been frozen out of the Caucus.

But anyway, Tizard got the upper-hand in the end and was able to put the boot in to Goff saying he's not up to being Prime Minister a couple of times.

All because the Labour Party didn't have the gumption to stare down two right-wing bloggers.

So that's what's led to this damaging tete-a-tete over the last week. Damaging for Goff, because even though the Tizard bomb has technically been defused its blown up in Labour's face.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13/04/2011 7:11:54 p.m.

douglas wrote:

national are the govenment of charles dickins day PLEASE SIR MAY I HAVE SOME MORE ? THIS TORY GOVENMENT IS PLAIN EVIL .THE NATS ITS WELFARE FOR THE WEALTHY NOW THATS REAL BLUDGEING OF THE STATE .

11/04/2011 12:06:19 a.m.

sara wrote:

GOFF UP 5% TV 1 POLL LABOUR UP ON 35% as the election draws closer labour could easily pick up 8 points , that makes it vary difficult for national who realy need 50% of the vote on their own . not an easy task , i think labour did it in 1940 on 52% of the vote , national did way better that year than they did under bill english in 2002 . its up to you nz do you want to sell your assets that make this country lots of money for a quick one of payment ? . i dont think so .do you like business on welfare in this country like these huge billion doller bail outs national are giving to their mates in big business for their own bad decisions . just give the money directly to the home owners themselves .

7/04/2011 10:58:27 a.m.

Patrick Gower wrote:

Hi lprent,
Nice to have you on here.
In my opinion, all blogs are created equally.
That includes The Standard - I've read lots of your posts there.
No need to call me a dickhead though is all I'd say.
PG

7/04/2011 8:00:57 a.m.

Greg Pressland wrote:

Gower you know nothing about labour, if you consort with scum on the right blogs you'll get your come uppance. Labour will win the election in November and we will be saved - God Bless Saint Helen. i'm off to see Darren Hughes to deliver a swiss ball.

6/04/2011 10:46:27 p.m.

dr doolittle wrote:

if they read kiwi blod it just proves how slanted the news is.what about the christian vote national has once again taken our 6% of the vote for granted. year lets re elect total failure , boy we are bright you gotta say that ? .

6/04/2011 8:21:32 p.m.

lprent wrote:

Hey Patrick, it sounds to me like you have been reading too much bullshit from those self proclaiming idiots at kiwiblog and gotcha. Like you, they know bugger all about politics inside Labour. One of the critical things that has to be done in political parties is to allow new people to go into parliamentary politics. If you don't have new blood going through, then you can't find your new ministers of the future. Judith has been in parliament for a considerable timespan, but given an opportunity to bring new people in, then we took it. Unlike you, I'm actually in Labour in Mt Albert. I'd have to describe your ideas as just being an amusing fairy tale. It would have been nice to have had Phil T as our candidate, and if Helen had left at the end of this term, it is what would have happened. But given an opportunity to increase the number of new MP's this term in a way that bypasses the national list selection process - who could resist putting a new MP in. Personally I voted for Meg Bates at selection, but I would have voted for any capable new candidate to get almost 3 years of experience on a new candidate. Phil Twyford had a Tizard problem alright, but it had little to do with those jerk offs in the rightwing blogs. Pulling in a not particularly outstanding MP was a burden on Phil Twyfords chances. He was already in parliament, getting tested, and doing pretty well. Putting in someone else to pick up experience was a hell of a lot more interesting for Labour. Same thing with this time. More experience for someone who is continuing in politics is a hell of a lot more useful for Labour than your pathetic ideas about what is good for Labour. If you want to look a lot less like a dickhead about left politics, then I'd suggest that you spend more time reading the left blogs. Try ours at The Standad.

6/04/2011 5:30:21 p.m.

abraham wrote:

the only reason goff is in the position he is in is becouse the media never gave in a fair go from day one . plase dont be so disrespect the leader of the opposition mr gower , or its office .

6/04/2011 5:28:25 p.m.

abraham wrote:

the only reason goff is in the position he is in is becouse the media never gave in a fair go from day one .

5/04/2011 10:43:07 p.m.

abraham wrote:

no they did not .

5/04/2011 2:30:25 p.m.

Will de Cleene wrote:

@Patrick, Little Big Man is my pet name for Andrew Little.

Patrick Gower's Entries

Previous123Next