Goff should have acted earlier - commentators

Print

Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:35p.m.

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA)

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA)

By Elizabeth Puranam

Labour MP Darren Hughes has resigned from Parliament while police investigate allegations of a sexual nature from an 18-year-old male.

Today two people told 3 News they saw a man who fits the description of the complainant naked and trying to hitch a ride in the Wellington suburb of Haitaitai on the morning of the incident.

Mr Hughes had been offering to resign for three days but his leader Phil Goff refused to accept it until this evening.

But should Phil Goff have acted earlier?

Mr Goff called a last-minute press conference this evening to announce the end of one of his most promising MP's careers.

“Ladies and gentlemen, I've spoken to Darren Hughes this afternoon and he has informed me that he will be resigning from Parliament,” Mr Goff said. “The controversy around the complaint made against him has made it increasingly impossible for him to carry out his public duties.”

The complaint is by an 18-year-old first year university student; it followed a night out drinking at Wellington bars.

That night is alleged to have ended badly back at Labour's deputy leader Annette King's home, where Mr Hughes lives.

It's understood the student left on foot in the early hours of March 2.

3 News spoke to two witnesses who say they saw a man matching the student's description, standing completely naked on the road.

They didn't want to appear on camera, but provided 3 News with a statement saying:

“He was standing there with one hand over his private parts and the other hand with his thumb out, hitch hiking.

“I thought, ‘oh boy, the husband's come home and it's a quick exit’."

Mr Hughes maintains his innocence, despite his resignation.

“I take him at his word that he's done nothing against the law, but it will be a case of judgement that's led to the complaint,” Mr Goff told Campbell Live tonight.

Mr Goff has known about the complaint for two and a half weeks and political commentators say he should have acted earlier.

“It's a test of leadership,” says Matt McCarten. “He's had two weeks, two weeks, to work this out.

“This is all reacting in a panicky way which starts to raise the questions about him.”

Kiwiblog editor David Farrar says the political side is over for Mr Hughes, but not for Phil Goff.

“Because this resignation was offered two weeks ago and people are going to be saying why didn't he accept the resignation two weeks ago?”

Judith Tizzard is next on Labour's list to replace Mr Hughes, but couldn't be reached today.

3 News spoke with former members of the Labour Party tonight who said this is a very sad day for Mr Hughes.

The party's former president Mike Williams selected Mr Hughes as a candidate and said this is the end of a very promising MP and called it a “human tragedy”.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

27 Mar 2011 08:42a.m.

george wrote:

This is all a nonsense,Its time all political parties diligently worked for the geographic and economical health
of new Zealand... We New Zealanders should dump those that engage in petty point scoring politics .cheers

26 Mar 2011 11:19p.m.

Nick wrote:

@Davey. Your argument is complete rubbish. When a politician is involved in a scandal, the media attack he/she as viscously as possible. For National, it was Worth and Wong. For Labour, it was Carter and Hughes. The only difference is that Labour try to make political points out of it. Have you heard Key attack Goff in the same way which Goff did when the Worth scandal occurred? Face the facts. Goff is a hypocrite, he says what is convenient at the time. We should not let a man like him have the keys of power, as he would turn our bad situation, into something much worse.

26 Mar 2011 03:03p.m.

Brad wrote:

Vintage Phlip Phlop Goff.

26 Mar 2011 02:21p.m.

davey wrote:

Nick you are just a dick,Clarke is correct to what he has written.And If you look into the media on most of this stuff,they support NATIONAL so where is the correctness in the media hype.And perhaps if you saw the close up on one the reporter was trying to trap Goff last night,and Goff was correct to keep saying that it was a police matter,and not for him to answer those questions fired at him.

26 Mar 2011 01:57p.m.

Nick wrote:

@Clarke. The problem is that Phil Goff attacked John Key during the whole Richard Worth scandal about how long it took him to do anything about it. Now it turns out that Phil Goff was willing to do the same to try and save one of his mates. He is a hypocrite and not worth any of New Zealand's time. If Goff becomes Prime Minister this year, may God save us all.

26 Mar 2011 12:45p.m.

James J. Read wrote:

The vital point is being overlooked that no offence may have been committed.I hope that in both the Hughes and Garrett affairs,the media give as much publicy to the outcome as they have to their first awareness of the relevant incidents.

26 Mar 2011 12:45p.m.

James J. Read wrote:

The vital point is being overlooked that no offence may have been committed.I hope that in both the Hughes and Garrett affairs,the media give as much publicy to the outcome as they have to their first awareness of the relevant incidents.

25 Mar 2011 11:00p.m.

Clarke wrote:

John key waited 2 weeks to tell the public of the Richard Worth scandal, National didnt even kick Paula Bennett out for breaking privacy laws.

Rodney Hide knew about David Garrett for months to years before his scandal was made public.

This should be about how long it is taking ALL parties to inform the public not just Phil Goff, as he did nothing different to what John key did in the Richard Worth scandal.

Party leaders, which includes John key need to be more honest with New Zealanders, that i do agree with.