Goff won't axe the tax

Print

Wed, 12 May 2010 3:48p.m.

Goff is proposing to make fruit and veges GST exempt

Goff is proposing to make fruit and veges GST exempt

By Duncan Garner

Phil Goff's Labour Party is unlikely to axe the GST increase that will be revealed in next week's budget.

Goff has made a speech in Nelson today, and afterwards said it would hard to reverse the planned increase from 12.5 to 15% - despite months of campaigning against the tax.

Goff says Labour will look at exempting fresh fruit and veges from the GST increase - but he stopped short of committing to it. It's a difficult area for Goff, as a politician he has spent the best part of two decades opposing exemptions for GST - he has always said it must include all goods and services.

But he's justifying his change of heart by saying low income people will be offered little relief by way of compensation from the Government in next week's budget - and something has to be done.

Raising GST will raise $2 billion, and Goff's Labour Party has some seriously big spending promises that it also needs to fund.

And that's why Labour can't 'axe the tax' it's been campaigning against. Goff says he will reintroduce a top rate of tax at 38c for those earning over $100,000. Currently the top rate of tax kicks in at $70,000 but that's likely to next week be dropped to 33c in the budget.

Goff also says a new Labour Government would restore contributions to the NZ Superfund, at a cost of $2b a year. Labour is also promising to restore entitlements to Kiwisaver that National took away. Under Labour, employers would have had to contribute 4% to their employees. National cancelled that. Labour is clearly signalling it will once again force employers to be more generous.

Goff is also looking at making Kiwisaver universal or compulsory. I think that's smart from Goff. Australia has a compulsory scheme. Currently it's a 9% contribution - but it's going to 12% shortly. Savings are crucial to the performance of an economy.

So what to make of Goff's alternative budget?

It's not a full and exhaustive list of what Labour would do. And most of it shouldn't come as any surprise. Goff has signalled already that the top rate of tax would be re-introduced. It's clear middle and low income earners will get extra relief - but how much? No one knows. It's hugely expensive to give tax cuts to the majority. The Superfund restoration is not surprising. It was Labour's baby. The Kiwisaver shake-up is also not surprising - that was also their baby.

The biggest surprise is the GST exemption on fruit and veges. It's a major change for Labour. Michael Cullen never agreed with it, but Labour has to carve out new territory, and Goff is trying to do it.

But is it enough to get the crowds engaging with Labour again? Probably not. Not at this stage. But Goff had to do something pre-budget. The real meat on Labour's policy bones will come in election year.

Labour needs some kind of policy circuit breaker. It wasn't in today's speech, but that wasn't the plan. Labour needs to show next year - it has some kind of alternative thinking, perhaps a couple of big ideas. Exempting apples from the GST hike and restoring old Labour policies is a start - but it's not an election winner.

The real problem for a party that loves to spend - is that there is no money.

If Goff really wants to make ground right now - he should pile into John Key. Key has led Tuhoe down the garden path over its treaty settlement. It looks like he has seriously misled them over title to the Ureweras. Now Key's integrity is being questioned and rightly so. Not just by Tuhoe, but by his coalition partner, the Maori Party. Goff should put policy to one side for now, and use this opportunity to re-engage with the Maori Party and expose Key for the double dealing.

The Maori Party/National relationship is strained. Key's word, his credibility, his integrity is being questioned.

What an opportunity for Goff.

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Oct 2010 03:50p.m.

Solomon wrote:

The chief executive of the N.Z.Economic Institute Of Economic
Research,Jean-Pierre De Raad (PageB5- The Dominion Post,Wednesday,October
13,2010) seems limited in understanding the real purpose tax is
collected by Government, as do, of course, Bill English,and Michael Cullen,
along with previous New Zealand finance Ministers.

Giving the largest cut to the rich, who are the most likely to save a
great deal, is not an intelligent thing to do when the economy is struggling
to pull out of a recession, resulting in a 'Stuttering' and long overdue
recovery, that has created few new jobs.

Governments purpose in collecting tax is to spend to it !
When government spends,it automatically becomes income to a large number
of citizens.

The trouble is , and always has been,is, the way tax is collected
Bill English will argue , if not enough is collected borrow,borrow, and
borrow.
A nations real wealth is productive output, real goods and services its
citizens are able to produce.
Money is just Money !
Few so called economists understand the difference between financial wealth
and real wealth.
We all understand what financial wealth is, but few understand that money
only has value because it gives a claim on the productive effort of others.

Of interest , many governments which understand tax, are either implementing
or investigation "financial transaction tax's" "who's time has come," but
then,-"DIPTON"- is along way from the real world,

It,s current news in The U.S.A and Europe,-Millionaires and Billionaires in
Germany, are asking their government to increase their income
tax!!!!!!!!!!!!!

19 May 2010 12:41p.m.

Food for thought wrote:

I like this article that was published in the NZ Herald Tilted: Tough budget despite gains- English. Council of Trade Union states that National are basically playing up Nz Debt. Secretary Peter Conway says Nz 3rd lowest gross debt in OECD and 5th lowest net debt last year. This is ones a crack up from NZ Herald Tilted: 15 per cent GST danger within 5 year. John Key said " If National is elected & does a half decent job at growing the economy then increasing GST & top rate tax won't be necessary" . " I'm saying absolutely no (to increasing GST) because there's no need to panic at all". Key also stated NZ was in a good state when National came into power, so why are they blaming Labour for all the debt? Dominion post article stated that he was going to give tax cuts north of $50. I also like this article in 08 Sept 2008 tilted: Valuing families speech, which begs the question: "Is this the party that people voted in?:.

18 May 2010 07:22p.m.

foetus wrote:

Stop framing income tax breaks as a 'reward for successful New Zealanders'. What a lovely dreamworld you live in, believing hard work in isolation magically results in higher incomes. If the rich liked hard work so much, they'd keep more of it for themselves. Reality: the rich will pay the same GST (15%) as low income earners, but less income tax. This makes them richer. The thing is, being rich is actually it's own incentive. Because the more we personally earn, the more fun we can have, and the less personal tax rates matter to us. At a certain point, our incomes mean higher personal tax or GST rates stop being the difference between being able to afford a bottle of milk for your kids breakfast. So those of us who are able to increase our earning potential already have compelling incentives to do so. But some people are already earning the most they can. We're talking tradespeople, labourers, hospitality, manufacturing, etc etc. Low income earners will spend almost all their income on subsistence goods and services. Therefore a far greater proportion of the tax they pay is comprised of GST, relative to high income earners. So increasing GST raises government income at the expense of those who are going to feel it the most. And that’s not fair.

17 May 2010 03:02p.m.

RobertM wrote:

The real problem is Goff and labour aren't sexy. Phil is unexciting, worthy but not althogether to be trusted under strain. In short he isn't leadership material. Look if Goff was to come out like Tony Abbot put on some budgies and say he was for sex- we might get somewhere. But in the NZ context it would be ridiculous. The idea of restoringa 38% tax rate is ridiculous because to put it bluntly mid level professionals earning about $100,000 need another 10,000. The principals, computer It workers,eelectricians etc in that sort of bracket are exactly the sort of people we need. Having been in Auckland three months I incline more to the view that its almost hopeless in this country that there isn't really anything here. Wellington and Queenstown are jewels but the rest of the country including Auckland is incurably provincial and the talent has already left. strangely Kirk in l972 and Clark in 1999 had a sort of sex appeal, not sex appeal as would be understood anywhere else in the world but misunderstood or not they stood for a loosenig up in certain ways. I just can't see anything exciting about Goff, frankly the only notice I take of Labour is the flapper who appears with Simon Bridges.

17 May 2010 01:55p.m.

Dan wrote:

There is not a single politician in New Zealand with the guts to step forward and do something for the masses. Shame this country is going to the dogs in a hand basket.

15 May 2010 01:54p.m.

Hans wrote:

I think the problem here is clear it's not about punishing rich people, it's just the fact that GST rises will cause even more grief in a low or middle income household compared to a high income household. Yet National raises GST to lower taxes for higher incomes. The way National had done this was really a disgrace pitting people vs people. If national wanted to advance our economy, he could of done this in many other ways instead of lowering tax for the rich and creating conflict.

15 May 2010 11:18a.m.

ar wrote:

Labour = Robin Hood National = Sheriff of Nottingham Keep it simple stupid.

14 May 2010 05:23p.m.

Chris Lewis wrote:

I cannot believe that we want to punish 'rich' people why ? - they should be given tax relief. Hard work and personal success should be rewarded - we should insentivise this. Life is about getting ahead - not punishing those that do. Rich people generally dont get rich by sitting on there asre. They is little 'old' money in NZ - most have got there by educating themselves and working hard - I strive to be rich also - I got a degree and worked hard to get better pay - dont we all want better pay and to be sucessful ? - for goodness sake lets us celebrate finacial success in NZ - lets us get rid of this stupid socialist attitude that we should 'punish' the rich and 'redistribute' their wealth. We have it so wrong.

14 May 2010 12:35p.m.

Kim wrote:

@Duncan
Phil Goff refused to say he would reverse the GST increase right from the start. What the Axe the Tax tour was about was campaigning against GST increases to fund Tax breaks for the rich.
You have ask yourself if there would be such opposition to the GST increase if that money was going to be funneled into health, education or any othe community benifical reason. Personally my problem is with funding rich pricks that screw everyone for everything they can get... Its like the sayin on pirates of the carrabean...Take it all give nothing back.

13 May 2010 04:10p.m.

Fan wrote:

Duncan! Gives us a big smile tonight if you're news tonight. I'll be waiting!

Duncan Garner's Entries

Previous12345Next