Goff's leadership under renewed scrutiny

Print

Thu, 09 Jun 2011 8:24a.m. UPDATED: 8:50AM

Darren Hughes with Annette King and Phil Goff (NZPA)

Darren Hughes with Annette King and Phil Goff (NZPA)

By 3news.co.nz and RadioLIVE staff

Phil Goff's leadership of the Labour Party is under renewed focus this morning in the wake of the police decision not to lay charges against former MP Darren Hughes after a three-month investigation.

Police said yesterday there is not enough evidence to proceed, but Mr Goff is out of the country at his son's wedding, and deputy leader Annette King was not in Parliament.

It was left to Trevor Mallard to voice Labour's reaction to the decision. He said the party would welcome Mr Hughes back as an MP some time in the future.

"I'm confident that the police have done a thorough investigation," says Mr Mallard, "that they have made that judgement, and I’m not going to second-guess the police."

Right-wing political commentator Matthew Hooten suggested Mr Hughes could even be considered a victim under the circumstances.

"I think there's some sympathy for him, both because he's been forced out of Parliament because of his leader's incompetence.

"There's also sympathy that the investigation seems to have taken an awfully long time, and politicians can come back."

  • Can Darren Hughes come back and how did Phil Goff handle the affair? RadioLIVE's Marcus Lush speaks with commentator Matthew Hooten about Darren Hughes' future - click the audio tab above.

Mr Mallard's performance impressed Mr Hooten, who told RadioLIVE's Marcus Lush this morning that he sees Mr Mallard as a potential Labour leader.

"The way Labour should have handled this is when the incident occurred he goes on gardening leave, they announce that there's been serious allegations, they say that he's not going to be in Parliament while this is being investigated.

"He would still be an MP today if Phil Goff hadn't bungled the whole thing from the beginning."

Another political commentator believes that if Mr Hughes had been up-front about his involvement in an alleged late night incident, he might still have his job.

Political scientist Dr Bryce Edwards from Otago University says Mr Goff should have stood down Mr Hughes when he first heard of the claims, instead of later accepting his resignation.

"I think that Darren Hughes will be seen as cleared by many people, but there will be enough people that have doubts about really for the rest of his… political career that will stop him from actually getting back in to the very heights of politics."

Dr Edwards says trying to cover-up the situation has damaged Mr Hughes' chances of a political comeback.

Mr Hughes is optimistic however.

"I feel that I still have much to offer and I am looking forward to the future with optimism," he said in a statement yesterday. "Whatever I do, I would like to continue to serve our community and our country… Nothing will ever be able to take away the pride and satisfaction I feel at having been able to make a contribution to public service."

3 News / RadioLIVE

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

09 Jun 2011 05:06p.m.

Dave wrote:

What a weird headline! What leadership?

09 Jun 2011 01:02p.m.

Generally wrote:

Craig. Goff is honest and straightforward. Or just simple? You Labour guys know a good horse to back when you see one. LOL. Desperate.

09 Jun 2011 12:52p.m.

Clarke wrote:

I think it comes down to policy this election, and National dont have any.. well anything that hasnt been dragged out of the closet before to fail miserably. The Greens have the idea of introducing a capital gains tax and they say this will generate up to 4.6 billion dollars per year. Thats a truckload of money. If I remember correctly, business's and the wealthy just had a large tax cut. Raising mininmum wage wont hurt them all that much.. sure they will get greedy, likely take it out on the consumers and throw tantrums about laying off workers and trying to manipulate public opinion with sib stories. Business is still looking for government handouts, its currently on welfare, well in the public's eye anyway and thats not going to change anytime soon but there are plenty of business's out their posting increased profits on the stock exchange. But I think people need to think about themselves this coming election, what is it that the left or right is offering you this election?. The right is offering asset sales, increased pension age, no more interest free student loans. Remember they may not campaign on all of the same policies, but after the election is done you will get a mixture of all of them. ACT could slip through their policy on the pension scheme, or on axing the interest free student loan policy. National has already bled some of its supporters to Brash, and while I dont like the man or his lack of morality I will admitt that he has the supreme ability to polarise the redneck vote. There are ways of paying for policies and clawing back some of Nationals changes without increasing the need to borrow extra funds. If Labour could see a way clear to divest itself of its corporate interests and start looking after the ordinary folk, they might have a real chance. There are definitely ways of finding new money that dont involve flogging off mums old china. Nationals all set and ready to go into their "How to hock the Country" campaign.

09 Jun 2011 12:30p.m.

Craig wrote:

And John Key is a perfectly suitable Prime Minister, despite his government's recent of giving dosh to conservative religious groups without doing any preliminary assessment of their organisations or service provider claims first...

Yeah, right. At least Goff's honest and straightforward.

09 Jun 2011 11:37a.m.

Chargone wrote:

nevermind that everything i saw was Goff going out of his way to handle the situation as well as possible without biasing things one way or another or causing undue harm to anyone. huh. just noticed Christine made that point better than I. that said, though a number of people like Phil Goff (and i've not seen any reason not to like the man so far) I'm going to have to agree that he probably wasn't the best choice of leader in a job where Being the leader means being the main face of a glorified popularity campaign. I'd argue that he'd be fine if we had a governer who did their job and actually selected their PM (and other ministers) based on criteria that made any sort of sense given what those jobs ARE, but the combination of 'tradition' and 'popular opinion' used to make those decisions means he really wasn't the best choice. Good grief though, Mallard? seriously? are they TRYING to loose? sure, he's more visable and so on... but he was also pretty much the embodyment of everything that was wrong with the previous labour government. (not necessarly the cause of it, and there was a lot less wrong than the current national government keeps trying to claim, but still, i thought we were trying for someone Better than Goff, not a self inflicted metaphorical grenade to the face... of course, stupid party politics and 'strategic' voting will get labour in no matter what they do. it's just a case of if it gets them enough to beat national or not. personally i'd love to see someone Else running things cfor a change.)

09 Jun 2011 11:08a.m.

Neil wrote:

Interesting that if you leave the politics and media hyenas out of this it's a bit of a "no story here folks". Just goes to show what an artificial world both groups live in and why they that is the MEDIA and POLITICIANS are completely out of touch with what the rest of us are actually interested in.... Perhaps there's a lesson there - not that either group will take notice of it. The complainant's family said right from the beginning let the police handle it, and they are quoted as saying they've got on with their lives. That says a mouthful, and I commend them. To Alien 9/Jun 8:48 - you need to get past the "there's not fire without smoke" syndrome, you seem to follow the theory of anyone who is found innocent by the courts really just got off rather than were actually innocent.

09 Jun 2011 10:52a.m.

Alan wrote:

Sorry phil - you gotta go!Take as many trips as you can overseas on the public purse from now until november because thats where it all ends. Darren will return to parliament as spokesman on "youth affairs "

09 Jun 2011 10:26a.m.

James J.Read wrote:

Surely what should cause concern is the indecisiveness shown by Phil Goff. It is good that Darren Hughes has been cleared, although his judgement is open to question. In a few years I suspect that this rising star will be Labour leader and folk will be asking " Phil who? "

09 Jun 2011 10:11a.m.

Dianne wrote:

I agree with Frederick

09 Jun 2011 09:39a.m.

Kim wrote:

Another manufactured crisis by the right wing bloggers that tv3 reports as unbiased opinion. If you have to put so much effort into trying to infuence the election you must be worried about something. If i remember right Hughes fell on his sword for the good of the party he believes in..Goff handled it well by supporting his MP up until the media frenzy made it impossible to stay. If you are looking to blame anyone for the distruction of an innocent mans carreer...look in the mirror TV3 (and other right leaning media)