3News » Home
Full Story

Good news for the anti-whaling lobby

7 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA

video
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 5:24p.m.

By Samantha Hayes

There are two new reasons for the anti-whaling lobby to cheer today. Tokelau announced it is outlawing whaling in its waters – the 11th Pacific country to do so - and Japan announced it has been unable to kill as many whales as it wanted in the Southern Ocean this year, partly due to the actions of protesters like New Zealand's Pete Bethune.

Tokelau's announcement its waters are now a whale sanctuary came with a message.

"We call on the world to respect our sanctuaries for whales," said Rawiri Paratene. "No whaling in sanctuaries, no way."

But it's a message Japan has been ignoring for 23 years. This season they killed 507 whales in the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary. 

So will one more sanctuary make any difference?

"It is important that nations around the world show their commitment to conservation, that they take a stand for whale protection," says Karen Sack, director of International Ocean Conservation. "That is what we are seeing with Tokelau's announcement today."

In New Zealand, marine mammals are protected under the law, but New Zealand has never taken the next step and declared its exclusive economic zone a whale sanctuary, like Australia and 10 other Pacific countries now have.

Tokelau's decision comes as Sir Geoffrey Palmer chairs a meeting in Washington to discuss his suggestion to legalise a certain amount of whaling.

The 88 member governments of the International Whaling Commission will vote on June 21.

It's a move scientists from the South Pacific Whale Research Consortium say New Zealand needs to make a moral stand against.

"I think given the threat to the Southern Ocean right now, that a political declaration of New Zealand's waters being a whale sanctuary would seem to be a fairly easy step to take," says Sue Miller Taei.

In the meantime, Sea Shepherd say they will continue to police the Southern Ocean sanctuary.

The spokesperson for the Japanese whalers says their tactics were effective.

"The reason for the reduced catch this year can be put down to the 31 days of harassment by the Sea Shepherd terrorist group," says Glenn Inwood.

The Japanese caught almost 50 percent fewer whales than they had hoped.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [7]

Dan
29 May 2010 11:21p.m.

John Key and his attempts at diplomacy are disgraceful! I can't believe he is willing to ignore an issue which New Zealand has a huge obligation to take action against.. John key, I hope you enjoy the petty economic benefit you retain by keeping Japan happy. Evidently you think it is well worth the degradation of our opinions of you.

Bug
26 May 2010 9:45a.m.

Change. Its a big scary word, I know. But - its what we need to do to move into the future, lest we be stranded in the past.

Archie Reza
19 Apr 2010 4:39a.m.

Tokelau is a NZ territory why did it take them this long to "outlaw" whaling in their waters? Since the Japanese don't conduct research in Tokelau waters this means nothing to the debate. As for Bethune costing the Japanese researchers money you do realize that information is evidence against Bethune and by extension the SSCS in his upcoming trial? IWC scientific permits issued under article 8 don't have to recognize whale sanctuaries or the moratorium. According to the ATS Australia doesn't have the right to make EEZ claims that limit research in the Antarctic. Sir Geoffrey Palmer is wasting his time the whaling nations of the world aren't breaking any laws doing what they do now so they have no reason to change their position. If Japan were breaking the rules anti-whaling nations wouldn't be looking to "compromise" on the issue. The anti-whaling faction of the IWC are so clueless that they want to try to use a commission dedicated to commercial WHALING to end whaling. They need to get together and make an anti-whaling convention Then they can all agree not to go whaling while the remaining members of the IWC gets on with the business of commercial whaling. excerpts from official IWC website: "IWC HISTORY AND PURPOSE "The purpose of the Convention is to provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry". SCIENTIFIC PERMITS The right to issue them is enshrined in Article VIII of the 1946 Convention. Whilst member nations must submit proposals for review, in accordance with the Convention, it is the member nation that ultimately decides whether or not to issue a permit, and this right overrides any other Commission regulations including the moratorium and sanctuaries. Article VIII also requires that the animals be utilized once the scientific data have been collected. http://iwcoffice.org/conservation/permits.htm

Dmitry
15 Apr 2010 12:39p.m.

NZ took a bold step declaring itself anti-nuclear in the 80s. Declaring its economic zone a whale sanctuary seems like a small and easy step in comparison.

worrieddanish
15 Apr 2010 7:43a.m.

Often the right solution to a problem is also the hardest, but this is just so right that it's easy to make the right one. Come one New Zealanders, fight back. Kick some a..... Regards Lars from Denmark

Dave Head
14 Apr 2010 10:44p.m.

John Keys Government is a disgrace. We used to lead by example. Now we are led by the hollow-money men.
NZ has just upgraded it's Navy with ships that are to be used for fisheries protection -its a pity defence of the whales is left to the SSCS.
Bring on the next election [& retain MMP].

Ruz
14 Apr 2010 8:40p.m.

Good decision from Tokelau. Geoffrey Palmer on the other hands appears to be turning into our own Neville Chamberlain.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio