• Full Story

Government urged to consider Dotcom cable plan

Print

Govt urged to consider Dotcom cable plan

3News NZ

Kim Dotcom (Photo:Lloyd Burr/3 News)

Kim Dotcom (Photo:Lloyd Burr/3 News)

The Government is being urged to give consideration to internet millionaire Kim Dotcom's pitch to restart the abandoned Pacific Fibre broadband cable project.

Dotcom announced on Twitter over the weekend that he wants to revive the $400 million plan to build a 12,950km fibre cable between Auckland, Sydney and Los Angeles, which was abandoned in August due to lack of funding.

The project's original backers included Trade Me founder Sam Morgan, The Warehouse founder Sir Stephen Tindall and technology entrepreneur Rod Drury.

Dotcom, who faces internet piracy charges in the US over his file-sharing website Megaupload, wants the new cable to provide faster internet access to new "Mega" websites he is launching, including a cloud storage service at http://me.ga.

He is promising "free broadband for all Kiwis" and says the cable, along with New Zealand's cheap and clean energy, could also be a drawcard for other foreign internet businesses.

"The new Mega based in New Zealand might be what's needed to make this thing happen," he told Computerworld.

Labour's communications spokeswoman Clare Curran says Dotcom's proposal requires more analysis but is worth consideration.

"The sentiment is right," Ms Curran says.

"Kiwi businesses, particularly in the technology sector, have been calling for a second cable for some time now. Their concerns need to be taken seriously."

Ms Curran says the cable was essential for the Government's ultrafast broadband scheme and would create new opportunities for economic growth.

"As Kim Dotcom has pointed out, the Government is quite happy to invest billions in highways of dubious significance while at the same time neglecting the international fibre highway connections that will help our economy flourish," she says.

Prime Minister John Key this morning said Dotcom was welcome to try and revive the project, but was sceptical of his chances.

"It had a really star-studded cast of people who were prepared to be involved... in the end they couldn't come up with investors that thought it actually made sense," he told Breakfast this morning.

"So you have to say, ok, well Kim Dotcom might but he'd be doing something that other investors didn't want to do."

Dotcom has invited Mr Morgan and Mr Drury to his Coatesville mansion for a swim and to discuss the project.

Both men wished Dotcom well with the plan, but Mr Drury pointed out he would require permission from the US for the cable, and this could pose an issue with Dotcom facing extradition there on copyright and money laundering charges.

Mr Morgan said he'd be happy to be involved, but money was still an issue.

"It is an extremely important piece of infrastructure. What we really need is a cornerstone investor with a couple of hundred million dollars."

NZN / 3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

9/11/2012 12:41:07 p.m.

dennis wrote:

'US v Kim Dotcom. The case raises problems of double criminality, jurisdictional double criminality, the legality of investigation and the transnational transfer of evidence, and judicial expertise, but suggests that the core problems of cooperation with the US involves a mismatch in the scope of criminalisation'. Please print my previous comment which effectively says the same thing because it bounces off deaf ears to those of us that are 'doing all right, mate' and there are constitutional and basic principles involved that really spell the difference to what we are. Third world, rich, or third category: rich but 3rd world

9/11/2012 10:30:26 a.m.

dennis wrote:

It would be a whole lot simpler to set up any entrepreneurial enterprise without a bunch of morons causing trouble. eg Dodd? The prosecution of the application for extradition has 2 hurdles before it starts, and the Attorney General is not explaining either, yet must know full well that an allusion of law is being applied to impose conditions of bail. The first is the novel idea that secondary copyright infringement holds criminal liability. The second, even if the first is held, is can an "extradition offence" be based on a precedent setting case? That is, can a New Zealand resident be extradited to a foreign country based on a charge that no other New Zealand resident has been convicted of? 5 new incestuous appointments to the Supreme Court can not attain that result, or if it could I would suggest that Dotcom seeks a variation in "bail" and emigrates to Gabon. There is only one correct way for the National Administration to enforce new law and that is through Parliament and debate. We await the answers to my two questions after 9 months and 20 days of 'no explanations required, we are the "law"'. The common folk are treated with contempt. The Crown Solicitor thinks we wouldn't understand? No. None of it. There are no arguments and they are manipulating the "system" and finding they get away with it!

7/11/2012 11:47:42 a.m.

dennis wrote:

JohnKeyPM followers 65,531. Kim Dotcom 150,672 and increasing at 48/hour. Say goodbye to Helensville, John. Did you forget where it is? Do you want to split off a sub-electorate, Coatesville?

5/11/2012 1:16:20 p.m.

Brent wrote:

So labour will back the sky city Casino Deal now? Has anyone asked them?

5/11/2012 10:19:51 a.m.

john wrote:

Kim dotcom is on his way to a knighthood. GOOD WORK!