Govt: Several hundred more jobs to go

Print

Sat, 26 Jun 2010 6:00p.m.

Tony Ryall

Tony Ryall

By Tim Lambourne

The Government has revealed it's intending to cut several hundred extra jobs from the public sector, on top of the 460 jobs already targeted to go.

Speaking on The Nation this morning, State Services Minister Tony Ryall put the public sector on notice.

"I think we'll see several hundred more over that 500," said Mr Ryall. "That's a reflection of the fact that individual government departments are looking at how best they can organise themselves with no funding increases."

Nearly 1500 staff have already left the sector, with 460 more to go by the end of the year, leaving just under 37,000 staff.

3 News understands the Govervnment will focus its cuts and restructuring in the Education, Health and Social Development ministries, and in the Inland Revenue Department.

"Inevitably the work doesn't reduce and the number of cases coming in to different departments doesn't diminish, so those who are left are having to work harder and work longer hours," says Brenda Pilott, PSA national secretary.

But Mr Ryall is unrepentant.

"The real important message we're giving the public service is just like the private sector, just like families, things are a lot tighter and people have to make sure that they're focusing on productivity and value for money."

But National is being accused of breaking a pre-election promise.

"National certainly made a promise to cap, and not cut the public sector, and we've seen nearly 1500 jobs go last year, hundreds more going this year, so clearly that is a broken promise," says Labour's Grant Robertson.

Mr Ryall says he'll be able to confirm how many jobs will go in the next couple of months as projections from the various departments come in.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

04 Jul 2010 11:38a.m.

Sam wrote:

Remember 2003? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=3521713

29 Jun 2010 08:48p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

What I like to know,how much do the advisors to the government get payed?,also do they receive certain perks to go with the Job?I know Shipley and Richardson are advisors,do they get free travel,and allowances?If so why do they.We go too the polls on election day and vote for the party and candidate.And no way do we vote for the advisors etc.If the politician requires the service of a advisor he or she should pay it from their own wages.Like wise, if we need legal advice we have to pay for it.We seem to payout a lot of tax and dont get much return for it,it gets burnt up by politicians who seem to think it is ok,Too me it is forgery by a corrupt 100 plus in Parliament.

29 Jun 2010 10:41a.m.

aron wrote:

Dont worry 2011 is election year lets vote these torries OUT!!!!

28 Jun 2010 02:21p.m.

Jim wrote:

Totally agree Mark. Our Public Services are so top heavy with back office bureaucrats that the country can no longer afford the taxes to pay for those trough feeders.
Joker. You cannot create more jobs in the public sector when you have less people in the private sector to pay for more overpaid bureaucrats, we must think about affordability and the costs of these public servant "back-office" dwellers.
Don. I would not trust NZ Rail with any freight as they have an "I don't care" attitude, the freight takes forever to get to its destination (if at all). Besides, NZs rail system has been a joke since its inception mainly due to the small gauge of our tracks (the original Engineer should have been shot)!!!

28 Jun 2010 01:05p.m.

Don wrote:

Meanwhile NZ is gearing up for a post peak-oil future by spending massive sums on motorways and axing railways. So little foresight - so many National Party fund contributors...

27 Jun 2010 07:06p.m.

Joker wrote:

How many job? Shivers!!! This is a worry!!! Shouldn't the goverment be creating jobs? what about all this welfare reform business. National are doing their funny business again. WHOOSH!!- that's the sound of our country declining.

27 Jun 2010 06:48p.m.

Mark wrote:

Yes, it would be good for MPs to have their perks accounted for like everyone else. But the bloated and overstaffed civil service also needs to face up to the real world. Staffing has expanded for several years without, for example, significantly improving education and health services. The bloat can be cut without reducing service delivery.

27 Jun 2010 02:43p.m.

Craig Young wrote:

And of course, this "won't" affect service delivery. Yeah, right...

26 Jun 2010 08:40p.m.

abo wrote:

If Tony Ryall and his ilk simply focussed on realistically and honestly cutting/eliminating MP perks AKA TAXPAYER RIPOFFS - there would no need for other cuts anywhere!!!!
But of course that is called cutting off your nose to spite your face and Tony Ryall is a career politician - at least until he has done 9 years and has guaranteed gold-plated superannuation and all the other perks - just which part of you are we supposed to believe Tony - do you really think we are that stupid - obviously you do????