3News » Home
Full Story

Govt and Maori Party reject Goff's accusation

14 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Phil Goff (file pic)

Phil Goff (file pic)

video
UPDATED AT 6:00PM
Published: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 2:10p.m.
National and the Maori Party have rejected Labour leader Phil Goff's accusation that the Government has reopened racial wounds.
 
In a speech delivered to Grey Power in Palmerston North, Mr Goff launched a scathing attack on the Government, accusing it of reopening racial wounds and setting Maori against Pakeha.
 
Mr Goff said National is doing shabby deals with the Maori Party. He said the country could celebrate its rich heritage or re-open wounds and divisions.
 
"We can choose our future based on principle and with the interests of all New Zealanders," he said.
 
"Or we can have a country where on New Zealander is turned against another, Maori against Pakeha, in a way that Labour strongly rejects."
 
Senior cabinet minister Gerry Brownlee told reporters Mr Goff's speech was "a masterpiece of confusion and hypocrisy".

"I think he's decided there are several parades in town and he's going to wave a flag at each of them and see whether anyone notices."

Maori Party leader Pita Sharples said Mr Goff's comments were "a very desperate move...let's hope he doesn't stir up something when there's nothing there".
 
Mr Goff says Prime Minister John Key should have taken a stronger stance on Hone Harawira's racially charged outburst - but instead steered clear to preserve a short-term political deal with the Maori Party.
 
The Maori Party MP came under fire last month when he sent an abusive email referring to white people as "motherf...ers" while defending an unauthorised trip to Paris while on Parliamentary business last month.
 
"The true offence was that by abusing one racial group in New Zealand, he thought he could justify his side-trip off to Paris when his expenses were being paid by the taxpayer to fulfil his duties at the European Parliament," Mr Goff said.
 
"We cannot reconcile New Zealanders and make progress together in an environment where hatefulness can flourish, whatever it comes from."
 
Mr Goff also believes the Emissions Trading Scheme and Foreshore and Seabed Act deals are cynical. He accused Mr Key of holding back on criticising Mr Harawira so he could secure a political deal with the Maori Party over the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), passed yesterday.

The Maori Party agreed to back the legislation in return for iwi, who considered the ETS to undermine their treaty settlements, getting special rights to plant 35,000ha of Crown land and claim carbon credits worth an estimated $25 million to $50 million.
 
Mr Brownlee said Mr Key had been "extremely firm" about Mr Harawira's actions.

"Hone Harawira is an utter irrelevance," Mr Brownlee said.

"Why we're spending time on him I don't know...the Prime Minister doesn't start getting angsty about a lowly backbencher of no account whatsoever." 

"They re-opened treaty settlements that were made full and final in the '90s," Mr Goff said.
 
He denies Labour's opposition was an example of "playing the race card", saying the deal would not benefit all Maori, and would burden New Zealanders.
 
However, he said by allowing some iwi to top up their settlements, as the Maori Party deal permitted, then grievances would not heal.

"If you can never settle treaty grievances, there can never be healing, and you keep alive a grievance from one age into another."

On the foreshore and seabed legislation, Mr Goff said reopening the debate was again cynical and was more about creating a perception of change than doing anything.

"It's hard to see why the country should be put through all the grief just to put a new brand on law that's working... Access to the beaches is a birthright for New Zealanders, Maori and Pakeha alike, and must be preserved."

Repealing the legislation would create uncertainty and create "opportunity for disputes to fester unresolved".

Dr Sharples said Mr Goff had no right to even talk about the Foreshore and Seabed Act, which was introduced by the previous Labour government.

"It's so easy for them to talk about it like it's just another bill when it caused such fury among Maori people," Dr Sharples said.

The act is being reviewed and Labour has previously said it will work constructively with the Government.
 
He posed the question of what kind of nation New Zealanders wanted.

"A respectful, forward looking country or one stuck in shabby, short-term deals that divide New Zealanders and set one against another."

He said New Zealand was lacking the leadership to bring all people together.
 
RadioLIVE / 3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [14]

Glenn
27 Nov 2009 6:50a.m.

Really Alex? "Those bloody Maori's" is what most pakeha are probably thinking now after all this fiasco and especially after Harawera's comments. They only signed with the ETS so they can get their seabed and foreshore repealed. Just proves that Maori will stoop to any level to get what they want. Another fine example of MMP not working.

annon
26 Nov 2009 10:55p.m.

Good work Phil, Your highlighting the areas of politics that smack of buy-off by the National and Maori, Nothing to do with real things just imaginary Global Warming, Token flag waving but all to do with real Greed!. As an Ex National voter I supported the foreshore and seabed legislation, because it stopped the Greedy Lawyers taking the country for a ride at our expense.

Gavin
26 Nov 2009 7:03p.m.

Phil Goff is expressing the unease of many New Zealanders (Maori and Pakeha, and I'm sure other nationalities) with what is unfolding with our current Government. I certainly don't see this as scraping the barrel, as suggested by the TV3 reporter on the 6pm news in what I thought was a very poor assessment of Goff's speech. This is fundamentally not an issue of race. It is do with extremely cynical, short-termism politics from John Key and co. John Key may think he has wonderful vision, as I'm sure the captain of the Titanic did as well ... and many NZers are naively, and greedily, going for the ride.

Jody
26 Nov 2009 6:17p.m.

Well all i can say is, i voted for John key, thinking he had the middle class Europeans in mind, boy was i wrong, he will not be getting my vote again, I have never been a labour supporter, and still don't know if i will be now, but it's tempting! I'm asking, who's looking out for the Europeans ? not our government, as my husbands says, lets all move, give the Maori back there land, they'll come crawling back when they can't run a business, and starve.

Alex
26 Nov 2009 5:47p.m.

Really this is just inexcusable. There's no way I can defend Labour on race issues now, and I don't really feel like I can defend them on any other issue because I'd be defending a party that doesn't mind dog whistling about "those bloody maoris". It's totally wrong and Labour deserves to go down in the polls for it. Unfortunately I get the feeling they won't, and they might even finally pick up some support, but for all the wrong reasons.

Wgtn
26 Nov 2009 5:06p.m.

Alien I mentioned 3 referenda.. not one, and that wasnt the one I was focused on as I dont agree with the smacking one, however a victim based justice system.. if that not one we should act on?.

Mere, whether or not labour would have done the same thing is looking into the future.
The deal was race based as soon as it became about National and the Maori party.

Do I think any race based deal is reasonable.. no not particularly, the Maori party is a new concept, the party is not about New Zealanders and what is good for New Zealanders.
The name in itself means that they are a party only interested in what is right for their people and no one else.

I remember fervent National party supporters from the 80's and 90's telling their party leader of choice off for not taking the lead and not leadning by example.

And hariwira isnt just a backbencher if he were I wouldnt have a problem, he is party of the majority lead government which the Maori party backed to rule with them beside National, Act and United future.

Anything any of these members say can be recorded or misrecorded as "the government said" or "hariwira, part of the maori party joined to the National led coalition".

National doesnt have a leader, as the majority party leader of our government he needs to be able to discipline anyone who has signed on to help run government.

Shouldnt there be set standards of behaviour or do we just let them run around wild like idiots?, in a normal company they all would have be fired for some of the things they said.

Muldoon and other former leaders would cry to see what babies our politicians have become.

If ANYONE had made those comments I would have expected the leader of the country to come out and say "get out, thats not acceptable".

FPP is a much better system, the country isnt run by sackless idiots and you know that you are voting for one set of ideals.

Chris
26 Nov 2009 5:00p.m.

Maybe the government needs to learn from its history (or listen to its people) and discontinue dividing it into groups. All problems solved.

Alex
26 Nov 2009 4:48p.m.

I probably won't vote Labour next time round (and I usually support Labour). Labour playing the race card is no less reprehensible than when National did it in 05.

Hutt
26 Nov 2009 4:28p.m.

Its funny how sharples said a "deal is a deal" "we have made a comittment" when it came to the rumours floating about of the Maori party revolting on the ETS deal.

However thats not exactly true for all Maori, Iwi were looking to sue the government even when their settlement deals were done.

A deals a deal only means "for specific things".

Mere
26 Nov 2009 4:26p.m.

Sounds to me like Mr Goff is clutching at straws to get him and his party some votes... if he keeps on like this then he's going lose the votes not gain them.

This whole ETS thing is going to happen no matter which party is in power and both would have to get help from the Maori Party to pass the bill that they create - so what would Labour do in this case? hmmm? Lets concentrate on what the ETS might actually achieve rather than moan about what it's going to cost. I don't eally think global warming is happening but i'm happy do my bit to stop polution. If you don't want it to cost you anything then put in measures at your business and home to combat potential emissions.

I respect Key for not getting involved in the Harawera issue - it is up to his Maori Party peers to discipline him not the Prime Minister.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Was the force used at the Dotcom mansion excessive?
On January 20th, two helicopters and 76 police officers arrived a
Comments (191)