Govt picks up tab for toxic waste cleanup

Print

Mon, 23 Jan 2012 6:26p.m.

ECan and the local councils are joining forces to remove hazardous materials

ECan and the local councils are joining forces to remove hazardous materials

By Annabelle Tukia

Christchurch's earthquake authorities are worried many departing homeowners could be leaving toxic calling cards in the garden shed.

With 6000 homes facing demolition, it's feared everyday household cleaners and chemicals could be left behind to poison the soil for years.

Environment Canterbury (ECan) and the local councils are joining forces to ensure these hazardous materials are removed before any homes are demolished.

"With the land, we don't know what the future is with those residential zones and it's making sure those products are handled properly," says Don Chittock, ECan hazardous wastes manager.

To ensure they are handled properly, the Government is offering up $500,000 from the waste minimisation fund. That means ratepayers will no longer wear the cost for disposing of their waste and teams of inspectors will be mobilised to clear properties where waste may be left behind.

"The worst case scenario is they get overlooked in the huge challenge that the earthquake poses and they end up draining into streams or end up in the land, such that future generations of Cantabrians will be dealing with a contaminated site," says Environment Minister Nick Smith.

Robert Gerrie runs the eco-centre plant where people can leave their chemicals and cleaners.

"We've seen our regular volumes come in," he says. "It fluctuates from week to week, but we'd like to see a lot more coming through, especially as houses are cleared out."

It's an initiative that means there is now one less hassle to think about for red-zone homeowners on the move.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

24 Jan 2012 06:03p.m.

sizemik wrote:

I'm not surprised people are leaving these items behind. The Council insists on charging clean up disposal fees which are exhorbitant in the wake of these events. I have spents 100's of dollars personally, cleaning up for elderly and infirm folks who have left the city . . . more than $500, and I'm unemployed. No doubt they have to pay their massive salaries somehow!

24 Jan 2012 11:21a.m.

jan wrote:

fair enough, if you were told to get out and leave your tv, lounge,beds etc then you aren't going to take your chemicals from the shed or kitchen. Also the government = taxes. Whenever the word government is used it sounds like an independent bodies doing good. It is not, I'm not begruding the cost but, heck it is our money including the very people in chch as well money which is paying for this. Also Im glad this was though of before the demolitions go ahead. Are any of the bricks, windows or big trees going to be salvaged and reused? I might of missed that item of news if it was reported, hope they are recycled.