Govt proposes mining on conservation land

Print

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.

Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee

Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee

The government is proposing to allow mining to take place on conservation land - in parks, reserves and wildlife sanctuaries.

It says it is time the mining industry was allowed to exploit some of the vast mineral wealth such as coal and gold lying beneath the ground in the conservation estate.

However, in almost the same breath, Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee is trying to reassure the public by saying there are no plans for the wholesale opening of protected land.

The very suggestion of mining is horrifying conservationists.

It is untouched conservation estate that New Zealand stakes its international reputation on, but it is what is underneath it that the Energy Minister is interested in.

“The last government spent nine years explaining the gap between Australia and New Zealand as being because of their mineral wealth,” says Brownlee. “What New Zealanders need to know is this country is similarly endowed. If we make choices to ignore that, that’s fine.”

Brownlee says it is time the mining industry was allowed a closer look at parts of the conservation estate with high mineral wealth and low conservation values.

He says it is simply a stocktake and high value Department of Conservation land is not up for grabs.

“We certainly have no intention of digging up the conservation estate, as some would accuse us,” states Brownlee.

But critics say our national parks should be left just as they are.

“These generate huge amounts of income for New Zealand. Our biggest industry, tourism, is based on it and generated $21 billion a year and we need to keep those national parks,” explains Brownlee. “The core of our conservation needs to remain.”

“Like most people, I’m aghast,” says Labour Conservation Spokesman David Parker. “We were certainly not told this before the election that parts of the conservation estate – including national parks – would have big coal mines on them. How absurd!”

Brownlee cites the moving of the snails near the Stockton coalmine as an example of how the mining and conservation sectors can co-operate.

“I think there is a degree of panic about this that is actually rather surprising,” admits Brownlee.

The Prime Minister was also downplaying concerns.

“I think it’s one step at a time with this stuff and I think there potentially are opportunities,” says Key.

Brownlee has talked up the $2 billion mining sector's performance over recent years. As a result those in the industry are understandably elated.

“There’s huge potential for coal and gold on the coast, but with 87 percent of it locked up it’s very difficult to get at it,” says Alan Birchfield.

But hope it will not just be big foreign interests who benefit.

“It looks like they’re going to encourage overseas investors to come in,” says Birchfield. “But they should also encourage the local people who are here to utilise the minerals as well,”

It is estimated New Zealand has up to a $140 billion worth of mineral deposits.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Feb 2010 09:05p.m.

peter petterson wrote:

It will be the thin edge of the wedge - once started impossibe to stop. I say definately not!

15 Oct 2009 12:08p.m.

Chris wrote:

I think that it just as much of a good thing as it is a bad thing. New Zealand has had deficits every year for the past decade and no one seems realize that, if we could just open ONE mine that would be enough to put NZ back on its feet. I honestly could give a s*** about any Tangata Whenua or Iwi, this is problem the whole of New Zealand needs to worry about. Let's not divide NZ any further. We need to have discussions and debates and hear both sides of the story before we make a decision.

05 Oct 2009 05:14p.m.

Simon wrote:

I'm becoming embarrassed to call myself a Kiwi. This is a complete discrace! Come on New Zealanders stand up for your country and don't let the government do this! Its a short sighted solution and will only lead to more exploitation. New Zealand is the most beautiful country on earth. This won't be the case if mining begins in our national parks.

13 Sep 2009 09:05p.m.

scrubbuzz.com wrote:

...a blessed relief to get back to true National party politics after all this time, roll out the topographical maps and start talking… mineral resources. All that tinkering with allowing developers to cut down a few trees was a distracting sideshow so it’s reassuring to get back to business. And what a lot of business there is to be had. Billions of it according to some reports, on our seabed alone. Foreshore? For sure bro, it’s yours – if you can afford to buy it. That’s what’s so great about government owned assets – everybody gets a slice of the pie, providing you get invited to sit round the table when it’s getting carved up of course......(contin) http://www.scrubbuzz.com

29 Aug 2009 01:17p.m.

Deane wrote:

The PM is tourist minister, whos govenments wants to destroy DOC land.

No wonder they rushed changes to the RMA during christmass.

God the public are stupid. They are at 56% in the polls. They can do what they like.

28 Aug 2009 07:03p.m.

Tim wrote:

When are we going to move with the times? This is going to have significant environmental effects, even if the mining is done underground. It could force a number of native species closer to extinction. The only long-term significant economic benefits will be to international multi-national companies and our tourism industry will take a huge hit.

28 Aug 2009 05:04p.m.

Jan wrote:

He gives reasons why anf the $$$$ its worth....Why even look ... if they have no intention of going for it...
I think we need to panic....
Where there is smoke there is always fire...

28 Aug 2009 01:57p.m.

M wrote:

It's not just 'greenies' as the reporter put it that will oppose mining on conservation land. Many in the tourism industry, tangata whenua, and everyday kiwi families that enjoy our great outdoors i'm sure are set to loose if this goes ahead. We may get some short term profits from this, but in the long run this would be detremental to not only our environment but our economy aswell. I hope John Key as Tourism minister will acknowledge this.

28 Aug 2009 10:05a.m.

Ngaire wrote:

What part of the following statement Mr Brownless said don't people understand. Why can't we take anything a face value - why do we continually panic and expect the worst. We have to get over ourselves. "He says it is simply a stocktake and high value Department of Conservation land is not up for grabs.

“We certainly have no intention of digging up the conservation estate, as some would accuse us,” states Brownlee.

28 Aug 2009 09:36a.m.

jan wrote:

It had to be this lot.... all they have been interested in is lining the pockets of overseas interests …watch and wait and see….
They have no intention of giving this up…it will be pushed through as with everything else that is unpopular....They believe in the almighty dollar....not in the environment…..They call it progress.....Will sell it all and there will only be a few that will reap from it ….you can bet it wont be the NZ population…
There is only one way to stop them that is at the next election....