Govt seeks cheaper way to build small homes

Print

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 5:07p.m.

Stephen Smith's small home design

Stephen Smith's small home design

By Tony Field

The Government wants to make it cheaper to build simple smaller homes.

It has released a guide that cuts the red tape required to get resource consent, without compromising design quality.

The announcement was made on the site of a soon-to-be-built house that gained resource consent in just one day.

The design is innovative, but it uses traditional materials, like brick, timber and a tin roof – and it will cost just $168,000 to build.

“I know $168,000 sounds a lot to someone who hasn't got a lot, but believe me, relative to just your average house price in Auckland, that's very cheap,” says Housing Minister Maurice Williamson.

It was designed by Stephen Smith – the winning entry from over 100 others in the Department of Building and Housing's ‘Starter Home’ design competition.

“It can adapt itself to a variety different sun angles in terms of orientation,” says chief judge Gordon Moller.

“It could be one of a group of houses. The design lends itself to clustering together so it has a lot of different applications and it's affordable.”

Mr Williamson turned the first sod of soil on the construction of the house - but he was also at the Otara site to promote a new 202 page guide, aimed at fast tracking resource consents for developers, architects and qualified builders working on affordable mass produced housing.

“I think, if anything, we will be giving quite strong guarantees that the product that comes out the end will be a better quality and that we won't be building some of the rubbish of the past,” says Mr Williamson.

Many people can't afford an architect – but when the houses are mass produced it's a lot more financially viable for architects to get involved.

“If this was picked up by a house building company who was going to roll it out, or a government agency, who was going to roll it out, then sure you can design much better outcomes than we are currently seeing in subdivisions,” says Mr Smith.

A far more demanding resource consent process will remain in place for more complex projects or one's using less proven materials.

Housing New Zealand hopes Stephen Smith's design can be built in 18 weeks, after which it will be used as a show home, so people can see that innovative design can also be affordable.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

17 Sep 2010 09:09a.m.

Gary wrote:

bigkev - why not? Given that we have the 2nd most expensive housing in the world - maybe we need to get real about this.

13 Aug 2010 02:52p.m.

Gaylene wrote:

Can you recommend a company that is not expensive for us to get a Building Consent we have had 3 quotes so far and they are well over $10,000 man its so expensive to build a house its not even got off the ground yet and so far its cost us $20,000. Please help.

07 Aug 2010 09:01p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

Why not use shipping containers weld a couple together much less that the houses above,and the way some people look after state houses is appalling,$168,000 plus section etc etc,Why not just give a poor person the deposit for a state house,and have the buyer pay it off at reasonable rent,ass there are so many houses that are empty around the country,at least they would get some revenue out of them.

08 Mar 2010 12:32a.m.

bigkev wrote:

Trailers are big in america just need somewhere to park em'.

just joking

07 Mar 2010 09:51p.m.

Martin wrote:

Ok ,so you got a cheap house, but thats just house, add to that the driveway, some landscaping, maybe some retaining walls ( most sections in NZ are not exactly flat ) and before you know it you are up for 200K add to that the land of say $200-$250K ( unless you want to live in the wop wops where there is no work , or in areas where you have to nail your wet bix down , so nobody piches it, and you are up for $400-$450k not exactly cheap! borrow that over say 25 years at say 8.5% ( interest rates dont stay low for always ) and your repayments are $740 a week on a $400,000 loan over 25 years . Cheap ???? dont think so !

06 Mar 2010 05:09p.m.

simon wrote:

Pointless trying to have cheaper houses if there are only unaffordable sections to build them on.

Whilst local councils seige type mindset to rezoning land and then funding their empires from levies from subdivision remains good luck to ever seeing afforadble housing in NZ.

That is the root cause of the cost of housing, lack of supply of affordable land.

05 Mar 2010 10:19p.m.

T.A.Wypych. wrote:

It is not just affordable homes, pricing ,structure and location but the most important is to provide ways for first time potential home owners to have the ability to progressively own their own affordable home. So how is this possible??. Well the Government's "Welcome home" Loan doesn't work and the loan advance capitalisation doesn't work so how did I qualify for an affordable home. Well, lets look at our welfare system and how do I qualify for a system hand out. No doubt it's a balance between family income and needs. If the government could define that balance on a one on one basis then we are now working on a win/win solution. Remember the social issues and the costs that are created by families not been able to purchase an affordable home are far greater than a potential meeting of the minds and needs of a first time home purchaser of an affordable home

05 Mar 2010 07:13p.m.

UrielJ wrote:

Is the cost of a certain unit of house is appealing to the lower class of the society? If this so, would be installment with <a rev="vote for" title="Get a Low-Interest Rate on Your Personal Loan" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/03/04/985-get-a-low-interest-rate-on-your-personal-loan/ ">low interest rate</a> would be provided? Good to know that there are projects revealed like this through the help of the other individuals to the government.