• Full Story

Govt sends solo parents back to work

Print

Mon, 27 Sep 2010 8:50a.m.

Paula Bennett

Paula Bennett

By Dan Satherley

From today, the Government will be forcing solo parents it deems "work ready" to find work, or risk losing their benefit.

There are currently around 43,000 solo parents on a Domestic Purposes Benefit (DPB) with no children under the age of six, and under the new 'Future Focus' law, they will be legally obliged to seek employment.

The Government calls it "voluntary proactive engagement", but beneficiary advocates have a different view.

"This punitive change to welfare law is an attack on the underlying principle that welfare is the provision of assistance to all New Zealanders in their time of need," says Kay Brereton, advocacy coordinator at the Wellington People's Centre.

"The changes add sole parents with their youngest child older than six, to the 60,000-plus unemployed who face sanctions on their benefits if Work and Income doesn't think they are trying hard enough to find jobs."

Around 4500 parents have been selected as guinea pigs, and will be the first called up to discuss their circumstances with WINZ case managers.

Originally the new law was only going to be enforced in areas deemed to have jobs available, but this is no longer the case.

"We are working with these clients across the whole country," WINZ spokeswoman Zoe Griffiths told the New Zealand Herald.

"It's a big change, and for some people it will be scary," says Social Development Minister Paula Bennett, who herself was once received the DPB. "But I do not accept this is a reason not to do it."

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Apr 2011 12:50p.m.

katie wrote:

Im sorry..but loooking after children is a 24 hours a day job!! getting the small amount of benefit thats available to survive on is hard enough...now we are not even aloud to look after our children to earn that little amount? for your information john key..childcare centres for children under 5 have average hours of 8am-5pm on- fri. The jobs that these solo parents will be forced into will most likely be nights and weekends. shall we all drop the kids at John's house to look after? oh, I might drop my daughter at Paula's house...shes local! well done on pissing a whole lots of people off and making us feel worse stigma than we already do! Im going to Uni so I can get off the benefit..oh...but now you wanna take away any help with fees and childcare. thanks alot

23 Feb 2011 03:12p.m.

Nab wrote:

Well said Kat! Where are the jobs to go to? They are, unfortunately shift work, evenings and weekends. Are they going to start-up care centres that run 24/7? What if you have a thin support network? My parents cannot help (elderly) and all my other family are scattered across the country. I didn't sign up for solo-parenting..I didn't pop babies out just to go on the benefit! As it is, I have started my own business - but there is no more funding and I don't qualify for the business mentor programme.I have to find my own mentors, market and promotions, research etc...and I have to justify to WINZ that my time spent is a suitable activity while I build the business to a point where I can pay myself a wage. Although, they have put me onto the "we will phone you every 6 weeks to see how you are going" list, I still have to find a job (and provide proof) or cut my benefit. For those who are not in the know...They wont just reduce the benefit by $20 or so...they reduce it by 50%! And if they think it's your fault, they can give a two week stand down. What the hell are you s'posed to feed the family on? So then forced to use food grants and then budget advisory services because...Obviously, you can't budget! This is a CAN OF WORMS

07 Nov 2010 07:05p.m.

Patricia wrote:

Next election; Back to Labour, sorry john key :/ gave you the benefit of the doubt, big mistake next time i'll go with my gut feeling!

Paula Bennet; Ever heard of Kammar, It always comes back to kik you're arse. Happens to everyone!

29 Sep 2010 03:07p.m.

ann wrote:

the west auckland seat just went straight back to labour , shes turned on her own constituents lol . shes gone , they will put it high on the national list, most likly to protect it from the wrath of the west auskland voters.

29 Sep 2010 02:04p.m.

Helen1 wrote:

It is a priority for everyone to work not a priviledge to provide for our children and family. And we must all find our own thread and grind through lifes journey home.

28 Sep 2010 07:10p.m.

Deane wrote:

I agree with John Robb here. It does stink of a 'moral' judgement by other leading to this rather lame policy.

The reality is it removes the power for a mother in a violent relationship to get out. As the abuser will merely use this policy as a vehicle "where can you go bitch"

A large number of solo parents are from abused relationship or in a relationship that involves drugs, alcohol or emotional violence. Savy women brave anough leave such a situation leave because they want something better for their children.

This policy is punishing those people braking the cycle.

Good one Paula.

28 Sep 2010 04:31p.m.

ridley wrote:

Well sounds good but where are they going to find all these jobs for the solos.Basically this is political suicide for the national party.As solo parents wont be able to find decent paying employment. Most being pushed into this corner.Will simply have another child and wait for the next election. Your ordinary non voting beneficiary on the dole sickness, or whatever can be manipulated easily.However NZ women are a different kettle of fish.They wont stand for it and have the ability to group together in tight situations. They also dont forget and will wait till the next elections.

28 Sep 2010 02:57p.m.

Kat wrote:

Woohoo you go Paula Bennett.You get all those bludgers off the DPB and then you find them all jobs and while you are working on that little miracle you can find these families reliable child care as alot of jobs are shift work.Would you trust a total stranger to look after your children alone at night?.I think not.Get real. Time you got your head out of lala land and realised while it might be a good idea to get more people off any sort of benefit it is neither possible nor practical.Children have the right to expect their parents to be there for them no matter what, not some stranger.What ever happened to families being a priority not an inconvenience to ANY Government.As tax payers WE PAY YOU to look after us.It's not your RIGHT it's YOUR DUTY.SO DO WHAT YOU ARE PAYED (HANDSOMELY BY THE WAY)TO DO.

28 Sep 2010 12:53p.m.

Gwendoline Cooney wrote:

The DPB was also a means for a parent to be able to stay home and be there for their children. How many children will have no one to come home to and when the solo parent is home they are going to be tired and stressed.
Many may say...well I work and my family has to deal with it.
Well I say ..... that doesn't mean it is a good thing!
It's a huge added stress on solo parents, some of whom have no support.
What good is it really going to do? It will be the children who pay and then ultimately our society

28 Sep 2010 11:20a.m.

ian wrote:

Unless I am very much wrong---it should take no more than 4 minutes for all this to be subverted, and a way to retain the income effected.