Govt spends kitty to ease youth unemployment woes

Print

Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.

John Key announced plans to spend $152 million on creating work, education and training opportunities for unemployed young people

John Key announced plans to spend $152 million on creating work, education and training opportunities for unemployed young people

Programmes to reduce youth unemployment have left the Government with little spare cash to get through the rest of the year.

Prime Minister John Key ended the National Party conference over the weekend by announcing plans to spend $152 million on creating work, education and training opportunities for unemployed young people.

Mr Key said out of the $152 million, the total new spending would be $120 million between 2009 and 2011 and none of it would come from borrowing.

Instead the money is to come from the "between budget contingency fund".

This money is usually set aside for emergencies that can not be met within other spending such as unexpected natural disasters.

When asked about how much room was left in the budget for emergencies, Mr Key said there was very little.

He hoped that the hunt for savings and under spending in budgeted programmes would give the Government some room to move over the coming months.

The decision to spend the contingency fund was largely unnoticed at the conference.

National's first conference since winning last year's election was a celebration for members, but ministers spent most of their time warning that there was no money and many people faced tough times.

Youth unemployment has risen by 300 percent from a year ago and Mr Key unveiled a plan to blunt the worst effects of that.

The largest amount of money - $52.7 million - is to create 2000 new places for 16 and 17-year-olds not engaged in school to study at polytechs.

There will also be $20 million spent on a Job Ops programme to give 4000 low-skilled people a wage subsidy of $5000 over six months to get them into jobs.

Another $40.3 million scheme to be known as Community Max will get 3000 people places in community programmes paying the minimum wage for 30 hours a week and a $1250 training payment paid to the community group.

In all, Mr Key outlined nine programmes to be targeted at youth unemployment, some of which were expansions of current programmes.

The spending programme is targeted at reducing unemployment levels over the coming year as the recession makes employers reluctant to take on new staff.

At the conference, Mr Key urged his party members to hire staff and warned that leaving a generation of young people out of work would create far greater problems in the years to come.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30 Mar 2010 07:43p.m.

Judith Gawn wrote:

Shannon
Man do I agree with you.... Young people at UNi are in position of having parents income tested until they are 25 and if you want to drop out of school get preg at 16 and go on benefit NO INCOME test for family
Unfair, Discrimitory, disencouraging except that some young people have a long term view of the future and some live for the moment. Congrats to those who see the big picture>

07 Aug 2009 09:29p.m.

Yvonne wrote:

Go Shannon! I have a G"daughter working (has too) & paying her way thru uni. It would be so much cheaper & easier for her if she was on a benefit, to do the same study! The benefits have become a normal way of life in NZ - some people just do not know in order to live one has to earn by working.

07 Aug 2009 04:48p.m.

anonymous. wrote:

ive been looking for work since i turned 18,it is not thru lack of trying,i prefer to hav a job,am doing a 12 wk work exp,working 40hrs a week and for what 128 dollars gees wot a rip off it suks and if u dont winz cuts ya benefit,slave labour like to c how they feel if it were them.somebody give me a job.

05 Aug 2009 11:18a.m.

vailili wrote:

hey catching up on the news is really great

03 Aug 2009 02:48p.m.

Shannon Buchanan wrote:

Why is it that the people who drop out of school and live of tax payers money get their education which leads to their future paid for while the rest of us who are taking control of our lives are getting into thousands of dollars of debt to create our futures. now the government is cutting scholarships and contemplating rising fees. where is the incentive to go to uni when we can stay at home and be lazy and end up getting everything for free. where is the help for those of us that are actually trying?

03 Aug 2009 12:27p.m.

Lyn wrote:

What about the Training Provider who does not recieve F's funding.

03 Aug 2009 12:27p.m.

sheena wrote:

I agree with you Phil.

03 Aug 2009 09:00a.m.

Phil wrote:

To make jobs for younger people just make retirement compulsory at 60. The people falling out at the end will then make room for the new starters - simple really. All the money now spent on unemployment benefit and apprenticeship schemes can then go into superannuation. That's my plan anyway.