• Full Story

Govt to reform WoF and licensing system

Print

Govt to reform WoF process

3News NZ

Simon Bridges sasy the plans aim to save money

Simon Bridges sasy the plans aim to save money

The Government has unveiled plans to overhaul the vehicle licensing and registration system, launching a reform project to cut “regulatory burdens”.

Associate Transport Minister Simon Bridges says the overhaul aims to save millions for the Government, households and businesses.

“Around $245 million each year is paid in inspection fees and the time spent getting a WoF is estimated as worth $100 million, but it is unclear whether this results in fewer crashes caused by vehicle faults,” he says.

The areas being probed for reform are:

  • Warrant of fitness and certificate of fitness
  • Annual vehicle licensing (commonly known as registration)
  • Transport services licensing.

Mr Bridges also says the plan aims to stop a Warrant of Fitness check being used as a form of vehicle maintenance. He says no changes are set in stone yet.

The reform project has been criticised by both the Motor Trade Association (MTA) and Vehicle Testing New Zealand (VTNZ).

VTNZ chief executive Mike Walsh says changes to the system could keep dangerous cars on the road for longer and see an increase in the number of road accidents.

“Efficiency gains and short-term cost reductions need to be weighed up against the potential impact on safety,” he says.

Mr Walsh says New Zealand has some of the world’s toughest roads and even new cars are not immune to brake and tyre wear. 

“On the face of it, the potential risks are too high and could lead to a significant increase in road accidents.”

MTA’s Ian Stronach is also worried about the changes increasing crash rates.

“This is overly optimistic and represents a considerable risk to all road users if those assumptions prove ill-founded,” he says.

“We think all motorists want to have confidence that every vehicle on the road is safe, not just theirs. Regular and comprehensive inspections are a good value for money way to achieve this.”

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10/12/2012 7:01:20 p.m.

mark back wrote:

do not change wof checks as lots of us will be out of work i thought safety was important in this country there r cars out there that need checks every 6 months because not all owners are mechanics they need this service.

8/10/2012 11:44:53 p.m.

Duncan wrote:

Victoria's (Australia) 5 year road death average in 2007-2011 was 211 per year per 5.5 million people. NZ's 5 year average for 2007-2011 was 366 per year per 4.5 million people. The ONLY time a car needs WOF in Victoria is when it is sold!! NZ HAVE to have WOF every six months, something here does not smell right. Motorists, Take Action! against the Motor Trade Association, you are their cash cow.

7/10/2012 8:48:17 p.m.

Ralph wrote:

Perhaps a compromise woujld be to increase the current 5 years in which a 12 month WOF is issued to include vehicles up to 10 years old

5/10/2012 6:33:30 p.m.

james wrote:

Nothing is for free in this country the govt must have some sly plan to get back the tax revenue they loss if its changed to yearly chances are in the end they will just wack up regos nothings as straight forward as the govt makes out something nasty is behind it all meaning we will all end up paying more one way or another

3/10/2012 3:12:17 p.m.

Jacky wrote:

A car full service = WOF Passed in Mt. Albert area (What is the purpose of WOF)?

20/09/2012 5:20:21 p.m.

Matt wrote:

I think why change what isn't broken? What alot of people who aren't mechanically minded or don't do mechanical repairs/work in the motor industry don't seem to understand is this. The reason we have so few accidents related to car defects is because we have a WOF system that is aimed at picking up problems before they become an accident. $50 or there abouts is a small price to pay for a vehicle to have a comprehensive safety check and to prove it is fit to be on the road. All you people out there who think "new cars" are so safe better think again. I will give you all one example... Anyone out there driving a BA or BF 6 cylinder Ford Falcon, do you realise that there is "campaign" to replace the rear brake hoses on EVERY one of your cars?!!? I have seen several now where the back brake hose just blows out. If you don't get your car WOF by the dealership it won't have been done. But if you do get your car WOF by the dealership it has probably already been done and possibly without you even being told. This is only one of the MANY flaws on modern vehicles that all you drivers probably don't even know about. Generally speaking if you are on a low income and drive around your children in your vehicle, wouldn't you rather know it is safe for the sake of $50 once every 6 months? And wouldn't you rather know that the car driving towards you in a 100km speed limited area (thats a 200km/h head on accident) is safe to be on the road? NZ roads are very poorly maintained compared to Aussie for example. They are very hard on your vehicle. Think about how many times you hit a small pothole in the road, and the tole that is taking on your vehicle. If the cars on the road were all driven by robots and never scraped a gutter or hit a pothole maybe they wouldn't need inspected, but they aren't. There is no doubt in my mind from looking at the current amount of repairs I personally carry out that there WILL be accidents related to defective cars if WOF's were to be changed.

20/09/2012 10:34:56 a.m.

scott wrote:

Wow big surprise the MTA and Vehicle testing does not like this idea! In the USA they don't have WOF at all you just get heavily fined if your vehicle is found to be defective and GUESS WHAT? They have no higher rate of accidents where the vehicle was thought to be at fault. In NZ our corners often try and put the vehicle at fault when they can't find anything else. Most / nearly all crashes are caused by human error! WE are the only country in the WORLD with 6mthly WOF type systems.

20/09/2012 9:37:32 a.m.

Andrew wrote:

Question for Tim - I agree entirely with you, and diesel vehicles could align the RUC's with the distance based WOF's too. My question is, as a vehicle inspector what do you think a reasonable distance would be?

20/09/2012 9:26:17 a.m.

Phil wrote:

Being in the motor trade and seeing what can happen to a vehicle in 6 months this idea is a silly idea. People do not maintain their vehicle as it is so if you had no warrants they certainly would not be keep their cars safe for other drivers on the road! Engines maybe more reliable now days but brakes...tyres...steering components still wear out. Our roads are not like AUS we do not have big highways with 4 lanes and a big gap in the middle. Our roads are very different to over there. If there are no WOFs them the govt would put out a huge amount of people in jobs and the cost of a WOF when you sell your car would sky rocket! Plus you count on them in putting the regos up! The Govt is up to something!

19/09/2012 8:36:54 p.m.

Jim Seaview wrote:

QUOTE: " Mr Bridges also says the plan aims to stop a Warrant of Fitness check being used as a form of vehicle maintenance. He says no changes are set in stone yet. The reform project has been criticised by both the Motor Trade Association (MTA) and Vehicle Testing New Zealand (VTNZ)." Read @Bills comments. Just been talking to Family in Western Australia who have two family cars. My daughter advised that there is no WOF over there, but a vehicle inspection report is compulsory on changing ownership. She advised that annual Road Licencing (Registration) is over $400 per vehicle but that includes compulsory Third Party Insurance. Unlicensed cars are immediately taken off the road as they carry no insurance. I believe we should follow Australias example and it must include Third Party Insurance. The six monthly WOF checks done here is just another financial hardship that the struggling low income families with an older vehicle must endure. The Motor Trade Association (MTA) and Vehicle Testing New Zealand (VTNZ) criticizing what is being investigated is not surprising, all they are interested in is keeping the current State Condoned gravy train operating for their members. They are just very comfortable private sector civil servants!!!