Govt 'wasting time' seeking $1.2m repair bill - Waihopai activists

Print

Mon, 08 Aug 2011 2:02p.m.

Mr Murnane (left) and Mr Leason (right) arrive at Wellington High Court for their preliminary hearing

Mr Murnane (left) and Mr Leason (right) arrive at Wellington High Court for their preliminary hearing

By Lloyd Burr

Two of the three men who broke into the Waihopai spy base and deflated a satellite dome in 2008 have appeared in Wellington High Court today for a preliminary hearing as the Government tries to recover costs.

Teacher Adrian Leason, priest Peter Murnane and farmer Sam Land were found not guilty of burglary and wilful damage when they cut through electric fences to get into the spy base but the Government is now chasing an estimated repair bill of $1.2 million.

Today Mr Leason and Mr Murnane, who were wearing daffodils “signifying peace and non-violence”, appeared for the proceedings but both say the Government is wasting its time because they have no money.

Mr Leason says he has no moral obligation to pay the bill and it’s his effort to “inspire in the Judge a sense of curiosity in the law and a curiosity that secrecy is not ok. We don’t keep secrets in New Zealand”.

He says repairing the base is not necessary because it is illegal and the case is “just about the Government saving face”.

Both Mr Leason and Mr Murnane say today’s hearing adds to the publicity of the Government Communications Security Bureau and say they have successfully embarrassed the Government.

But neither of the men have any money and cannot pay the Government to repair the spy base.

Mr Munane says “I’m a pensioner so they might just dock my pension for the next 500 years but I don’t think I will last that long” 

Green Party MP Keith Locke says the Government should drop the case.

He says it’s a waste of time and the Crown is being vindictive after losing their last case against the trio.

Click on the video tab to watch Janika Ter Ellen's story. 

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

09 Aug 2011 06:29a.m.

David wrote:

I'm a Kiwi working in Iraq, helping re-build the country. I WANT my movements here to be a secret! If these three clowns think they are doing me a favour by destroying the communications that may keep me alive, shame on them.

08 Aug 2011 11:06p.m.

kirby wrote:

Good on you Adrian, Sam and Peter for taking a stand against war and secrecy in NZ. We're praying for you.

08 Aug 2011 06:17p.m.

John wrote:

3 plonkers lost in dreamworld

08 Aug 2011 05:47p.m.

john wrote:

geez talk about harassment. It happened 3 years ago, get over it. Move on!

08 Aug 2011 04:54p.m.

bOb wrote:

"Green Party MP Keith Locke says the Government should drop the case." Nope the rule of law should be apply to all, you can't have people running amok destroying other peoples property even if they think what they are doing is wrong. Letting these people off sends out the wrong message, if anything the people of nz should choose where either its worth keeping these bases operating in nz not some fringe group who thinks they know whats best for us.

08 Aug 2011 04:17p.m.

Roseanne wrote:

Perspective I suppose. They wasted 1.2 million of the taxpayers money but want to continue on their benefits. I want the Government to make an example of these clowns as they did a lot of useless damage in their "cause" and acted irresponsibly which sets a bad examples to other activists who feel they can act illegally and get away with it. Take them for everything they have got and then do their organisation.

08 Aug 2011 04:09p.m.

Carlos wrote:

Off to jail with these terrorists !

08 Aug 2011 03:49p.m.

alien wrote:

i would hope the teacher has been fired, children shouldn't be exposed to a criminal who commits a crime and refuses to pay for the damage he did. Any student in his class can damage his property and refuse to pay.

08 Aug 2011 03:21p.m.

cherie wrote:

If someone destroyed your property would ypou not want the person held accountable for the cost of it.

08 Aug 2011 03:09p.m.

Mouthguard wrote:

So we see how Keith Locke values 1.2 million taxpayer dollars. Crime or not, someone has to pay for the damage caused, why should it be me and my family? Secrecy is not OK? OK clown, give me your bank account details... no? Are those secrets different?