Govt's Ecan moves undemocratic - lawyers
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 3:08p.m.
Lawyers have branded the Government's moves to extend its commissioners' control over Canterbury's regional council unjustified and "a disturbing breach of the rule of law".
The Law Society's Austin Forbes and James Wilding delivered a scathing evaluation of a bill that allows Government-appointed commissioners to continue running Environment Canterbury when its select committee sat in Christchurch on Thursday.
The Government sacked the regional council, Environment Canterbury (ECan), in 2010 and promised there would be elections in 2013, but now wants its commissioners to stay on until 2016.
The bill "is not justified and is a disturbing breach of the rule of law," they said.
"Only a clearly demonstrable or overwhelming reason might justify the suspension of the democratic right to vote within a region for a period of six-and-a-half years," Mr Forbes said.
The time could not be called temporary and went against the council chairwoman Dame Margaret Bazley's advice for a return to democratic elections by 2013, he said.
Emergency post-Christchurch earthquake legislation already gave wide-ranging powers to facilitate recovery.
"The proposed further suspension of local body democracy runs counter to core constitutional values, most importantly that of a free and democratic society," Mr Forbes said.
Local Government Minister David Carter and Environment Minister Amy Adams have said they want the commissioners to stay because they are effective and still had work to do, but no details were given.
However, a Government report prepared in August revealed a key consideration was that a huge irrigation project must not be compromised.
The Government believes agricultural production in the region can be boosted from $1000 a hectare to about $7000, which would give Canterbury's economy a big boost.
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
17/11/2012 6:06:27 p.m.
National are a joke, undemocratic, and as Novapay shows, not even efficient.
15/11/2012 9:46:05 p.m.
Yes they did it again. Sack elected councillors so they can make sure a larger proportion of water rights can go to their farming mates. National the lawyers say this is undemocratic. How about not paying your educational staff? Or what about the open discrimination of the classes on relaxed entry to nz for the rich? I wonder how long before national is held accountable?
15/11/2012 7:25:01 p.m.
The democratically elected Environment Canterbury was sacked by the National Government because ECan was representing the preference of Cantabrian voters for a focus on protecting the environment over the private profits of the farming elite wanting to get rich by destroying the environment.
The National Government chose to intervene in the democratic choices of the Cantabrian voters and imposed their hand-picked, unelected dictators so they could gift the water to their farming mates and use the river beds as open sewers for their effluent.
It was wrong then, and their continued contempt for democracy & the democratic rights and wishes of the Canterbury rate-payers is wrong now.
For a party that constantly brays about no-one owning the water, these dictatorial authoritarians sure are doing their damndest to control the water for the benefit of their farmer cronies.
The National Party continues to sacrifice democracy on the altar of private profits. In the world of the National Party, the only good democracy is no democracy.
Prime Minister John Key has labelled the Labour-led Opposition the "devil beast"...
Police had to physically push anti-poverty protestors back after they tried to b...
Tonight comes the Budget announcement you didn't hear yesterday – Food for Schoo...
One major issue heading into the Budget was child poverty....
A petition boasting more than 37,000 signatures against the use of animal testin...
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.