3News » Home
Kim Dotcom

Govt's 'Skynet' legislation becomes law

42 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
The law is designed to stamp out illegal filesharing over the internet

The law is designed to stamp out illegal filesharing over the internet

video
UPDATED: 1:30PM
Published: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 6:07a.m.

By Dan Satherley / NZPA

The controversial Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill become law today, rushed through under urgency originally called to pass Canterbury earthquake legislation.

It passed its second reading last night, and was voted into law 111-11 this morning. The votes against it came from the Greens, Chris Carter and Hone Harawira.

The law is designed to stamp out illegal filesharing over the internet. It allows copyright owners to send evidence of alleged infringements to internet service providers (ISPs), who will then send up to three infringement notices to the account holder.

If the warnings are ignored, the copyright owner can take a claim to the Copyright Tribunal and the tribunal can make awards of up to $15,000 against the account holder. The tribunal currently has three part time members, according to the National Business Review.

There is also a provision in the law that allows copyright holders to eventually apply through a court to have alleged repeat offenders' connections suspended for six months, with or without a conviction or proof, and it is this clause which has many internet users and civil libertarians up in arms. 

The new regime would take effect on September 1. The notice regime would not apply to mobile networks until October 2013.

"Currently, copyright owners lack an effective enforcement measure against illegal file sharing," says Defence Minister Wayne Mapp, speaking on behalf of Commerce Minister Simon Power.

"The compromise provides the right balance between internet users and an effective deterrent against file sharing."

LABOUR U-TURNS ON OLD POLICY

Labour's Clare Curran said her party voted for the bill because it was an improvement on their own ill-fated attempt at stamping out illegal filesharing. Whilst Labour says it now opposes internet termination, the bar set by this bill is much higher than in Labour's original.

An order of council is required for the Government to begin terminating connections under the new law, which can only be ordered by a Cabinet minister and must be signed by the Governor-General. 

"The onus is now on the creative industries to prove there is a case to terminate access and that the notice system is not working," says Ms Curran.

"Rather than oppose it outright, we preferred to compromise to ensure New Zealanders are not denied access to the internet."

Under Labour's original bill, which was pulled when faced with stiff opposition from internet users, all that was required to cut off an alleged infringer's internet access was three warnings.

Internet users opposed to the 2009 bill turned their avatars, blogs and entire websites completely black in protest – called the #blackout – even attracting support from such internet heavyweights as comic Stephen Fry.

MP COMPARES INTERNET TO FICTIONAL EVIL COMPUTER NETWORK

A repeat of that protest began in earnest last night on Twitter, many users at the same time mocking references to the all-powerful, sentient computer network from the Terminator films, Skynet, by National MP Jonathan Young.

The NBR said it was "a debate that often sunk to almost surreal levels of technical ignorance".

"Do you remember the movie, the Terminator?" Mr Young asked, to loud guffaws. "I'm sure that you do, and the computer system called Skynet that ruled the world, is like the internet today."

MP Katrina Shanks wasn't much better, saying, "It is really important to remember that file sharing is an illegal activity." 

Much of the opposition online was against not only the disconnection clause and the lack of proof required, but that the law was being rushed through under urgency – an urgency that had been called originally to push through legislation surrounding the Canterbury earthquakes.

"Having been out of New Zealand for some time I was unaware that file-sharing had caused an earthquake," wrote Twitter user @Beatrix_Coles. 

A Facebook group at www.facebook.com/NZBlackout already has around 3,000 members (as of 1:30pm Thursday).

Influential US-based sci-tech and internet culture website boingboing.net weighed in, saying: "Using the tragedy in Christchurch as a means to advance the corporate agenda of offshore entertainment giants is shameful, to say the least."

The late night debate meant many locals were probably in bed by the time it was done, but some stayed up, including blogger and computer science student Gian Perrone.

"It reflects a perversion of the democratic process in which due time and consideration is given to the will of the people," he wrote on his blog.

"Furthermore, the tone and substance of the debate in the house suggested that the majority of the MPs are not well-informed about the complex technical, legal and social implications of this legislation, particularly the 'disconnection clause' that gives an extra-judicial remedy to intellectual property owners who are not required to submit to the usual burden of proof as in any other civil action."

GREENS, PIRATES FIGHT DISCONNECTION CLAUSE

Greens MP Gareth Hughes put forward an amendment to remove the disconnection clause yesterday, which was defeated 111-11.

Mr Hughes was taken aback by the bill's appearance in Parliament.

''It really surprised me because we haven't debated it since November,'' he said.

The Pirate Party of New Zealand, founded to "reduce the unfair monopolies perpetrated by the opressive copyright and patent system in New Zealand", has also slammed the Government for passing the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill under urgency this morning.

“Not only is the urgency process being abused,” says party secretary Noel Zeng, “but our Government is also exploiting the people of Christchurch by using their unfortunate situation to pass underhanded legislation.” 

Blogger David Farrar, who normally sides with National on policy matters, called the rush through urgency an "own goal".

"The decision to pass it through the remaining stages under urgency has led to the backlash, and has in fact over-shadowed the many positive changes the bill makes to the current law," he wrote this morning. "It is, to be blunt, an own goal."

He said he supports most of the new law, but congratulated the Greens, Mr Carter and Mr Harawira for voting to remove the termination clause, and Ms Curran for moving Labour away from their old position.

"I think that’s a good example of an Opposition being constructive and gaining improvements in a bill rather than just engaging in rhetorical opposition that achieves little."

NATIONAL'S MELISSA LEE TWEETS ABOUT FRIEND'S MUSIC COMPILATION

National MP Melissa Lee on Tuesday night tweeted she was going to have a shower and go to bed, listening to a "compilation a friend did for me of K Pop". Twitter users yesterday were quick to mock the gaffe-prone MP.

"I really hope that compilation was all copyright cleared. Otherwise, you know, you'd be a glaring hypocrite," wrote @christopherbull.

"Dear @melissaleemp, following your tweet re friendly K-pop compilation, we will be terminating your Internet. Yours, SKYNET," tweeted @decanker. 

3 News / NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [42]

Sanomayan
11 Aug 2011 12:41a.m.

A NEW system is urgently needed to properly reward copyright owners. Treating the public like naughty children (and punishing them like criminals) in the meantime is an antiquated idea that needs to GO. Reminds me a bit of the ludicrous un-reality surrounding the current soft-drug prohibition laws. Too bad those of us who actually see what the real story is know better than to get involved with Politics.....ever tried banging your head against a brick wall? It hurts.

Gen
05 Aug 2011 9:18a.m.

So now we can't share our music with friends. Whats the difference from some1 sharing via torrent or taking thier 10,000 or so songs/vids to a friends house on a portable hard drive and transferring them to their computer directly. Then that friend shares with his/her other friends the same way etc etc. Its the same thing just not online. Or just lending them a CD for that matter and they can copy songs to their puter. Where does it end?? STUPID

Nathaniel Turner
15 Apr 2011 10:34a.m.

Funny thing is that if they do manage to completely eliminate piracy they will effectively shut down the music and film industries. Those people that pirate are also generally the ones spending most of the money on music and movies. So if I can't download a movie and watch it before i decide if its worth buying then can you please put in a clause that says I can return rubbish movies if I buy them then find that I don't like them?

Nathan
15 Apr 2011 8:59a.m.

So we now have to pay for those files(taxable) the court gets fines (money for the government) Any one else see a trend here. But the money eyed nature of our government doesnt surprise me what really bothers me is the government is using emergency legislation for Christchurch earthquake to pass a bill that had nothing to do with the earthquake? maybe someone should look at this procedure, is this even legal in terms of emergency law passing? I agree that with respect to the earthquake the government should have the power to act quickly but last time a checked file sharing does not come under this portfolio.

Shane
15 Apr 2011 12:57a.m.

Dictatorship at its bes! Do what you want and give the people no right no matter what! I can see this getting really messy. Maybe we will be like Libya or Egypt soon. sticking up for these backstabbing richos

liberty
14 Apr 2011 11:05p.m.

Well file sharing does cause earthquakes. You can move a lot of mass in a very short time, a great distance. Causing a lot of damage, wiki leaks is an example. There is nothing more ridiculous than government laws to stop the earth from moving. It will not obey politics. The earth's core, responsible for techtonic plate movement does not take orders from government. Neither will the earths population "obey" such a stupid law. It does not matter how logical it is. The earth itself is not ruled by logic, but instead forces of nature more powerful than angry citizens that oppose mind control. How very dumb the government is.

hellonearthis
14 Apr 2011 7:07p.m.

How can people put the value back if there are no rules permitting fair use (satire), we have been robbed of our rights.

Jeffrey
14 Apr 2011 6:37p.m.

This seems to be a reoccouring trend with the govenrment, if you actually know anything about it you are excluded from the debate so as not to upset the stupid and their assumptions. I object to this and the policy itself. Will they cut off power from people who are accused of leaving their lights on to late next? I also object to the idea that the accused has to provide proof of their innocence, guilty until proven innocent and decisions made by the lowest common denominator. What a great country we live in, for the time being at least.

rondon
14 Apr 2011 6:15p.m.

Hmm...Im curious whether this is only limited to file sharing programs(torrents) Direct downloads may be uneffected.

Mart
14 Apr 2011 5:15p.m.

My 7 year old cousin and heaps of other kids I know download music, movies illegally. This will not stop it and its pretty much spitting in the face of human rights. A good film to watch about this type of issue is "RIP! A Remix Manifesto"

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio