• Full Story

Greens, Labour, Maori Party sign child welfare pledge

Print

Mon, 07 Nov 2011 3:36p.m.

Greens co-leader Metiria Turei says it is about time the hundreds of thousands of NZ children living in poverty are put on the political agenda

Greens co-leader Metiria Turei says it is about time the hundreds of thousands of NZ children living in poverty are put on the political agenda

By Lloyd Burr

New Zealand is not often a country associated with child poverty and it would come as a surprise to many New Zealanders that hundreds of thousands of children are growing up in this country in conditions of relative poverty.  

Relative poverty means going without doctor’s visits, shoes, wet weather clothing, sports and other recreation activities, child welfare lobby group Every Child Counts says.

This morning, Every Child Counts launched its campaign to get the welfare of children on the political agenda.

The group unveiled its ‘political pledge for children’ in Wellington, which encourages current MPs and election candidates to commit to doing something about it.

The pledge reads:

I pledge myself to work with the highest priority to ensure every child in New Zealand is given the best possible opportunity in their first 1000 days by

Clear ministerial responsibility for children

The introduction of child impact assessments

Development of a comprehensive programme of Government action to change the status of children that includes a commitment to ending child poverty by 2020, and strategies specific to Māori and Pasifika.”

So far, Labour, the Greens and Rahui Katene from the Maori Party have signed the pledge but National and other parties are yet to make a decision.

Labour unveiled its children and families policy today.

A number of ACT Party MPs have chosen not to sign the pledge, a spokesperson for Every Child Counts says.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett introduced a Green Paper for Vulnerable Children earlier this year to get feedback from the public on how best to address the many issues around child welfare.

More on the Green Paper

Green Paper criticised for ‘offering nothing new’

 “The political pledge is part of our campaign for more effective investment in children,” Every Child Counts chairperson Murray Edridge says.  

“The three year parliamentary term spans the crucial first 1,000 days of a child’s life when the most important physical, mental and social development occurs,” he says.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei says she signed the plan because she believes ending child poverty can be done.

“There are simple, affordable, and realistic solutions available to us right now to deal with child poverty,” Ms Turei says.

“Kids whose parents rely on benefits have the same needs as other kids from low-income families. They stand to gain the most from extra family income to cover the basics like rent, food, and power, but they are denied this support.

“The Human Rights Tribunal has found this to be discriminatory. Yet subsequent Labour and National Governments have continued this discrimination,” she adds.

Ms Katene says some current electioneering has aimed to demonise Maori and their whanau.

“We have been disappointed to see some of the rhetoric throughout this election campaign appears to demonise some of our whanau – implying they are incapable of feeding their own children; describing them as poor; robbing them of any hope,” she says.

“We believe that our whanau must be seen as the place in which the children can grow. I do not accept that whanau are the problem.”

Getting to the crux of the problem is no easy task and the statistics, provided by Every Child Counts, are sobering:

About 22 percent of children (under the age of 18, which equates to around 230,000) live in relative poverty (incomes below the low-income threshold) – this means going without doctor’s visits, shoes, wet weather clothing, sports and other recreational opportunities. 

There are estimates that poverty cost the nation 3 percent of GDP – which equates to $6 billion every year.

Māori and Pasifika children are more likely to live in poverty, leading to a disproportionate number of Māori children being hospitalised for abuse, neglect or maltreatment and a disproportionate number of Pasifika children being hospitalised for infectious diseases.

About 160,000 children are considered vulnerable at any one time. 

New Zealand has a rheumatic fever rate that is 14 times the OECD average. The risk of rheumatic fever is nearly 28 times higher for a Māori child and nearly 54 times higher for a Pasifika child when compared to a European child.

Over 13,000 children are admitted to hospital with conditions that could have been avoided.

Children in the most deprived areas were hospitalised 5.6 times more often than those in the least deprived areas.

31 percent of New Zealand children live in over-crowded conditions.

There are around 21,000 confirmed cases of abuse and neglect every year.

More than 47,000 children in homes with family violence.

More than 7,000 children leave school without qualifications each year.

Youth unemployment is currently at 23.4 percent.  The Māori youth unemployment rate is 25.7 percent.  The Pasifika youth unemployment rate is 29.6 percent.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Nov 2011 02:57p.m.

Trees wrote:

I'm not saying 'poor people' shouldn't be allowed to have children, but I think most people would agree a solo Mum on the benefit with 6 kids isn't ideal. Can we look at how we can help low income families manage contraception without being accused of invading civil liberties? I'm thinking nurse home visits every 3 months to administer the contraception injection? Nothing compulsory - just making reliable and affordable contraception convenient and easy for those who would struggle the most with extra mouths to feed. Got to be cheaper than supporting an 'unplanned' child for ~15 years.

09 Nov 2011 09:49a.m.

humpty wrote:

if the greens were really concerned for the children, they should be teaching the mothers how to grow their own vegetables, get their children to help in the kitchen, so that lateron they r able to look after themselves. also get them to play sport, nz has so many playgrounds if only they can be made use of. giving more money just to buy takeaways, cigarettes, sky tv etc will not improve the lives if children. all these announcements r for u to keep your job in govt and get such a huge salary

08 Nov 2011 12:19a.m.

keith wrote:

It never ceases to amaze me how people can be so full of hate for beneficaries. Sure there are some who abuse the benefit just as there were farmers who abused the sheep retention scheme that national introduced for there mates. For those that dont know about this scheme farmers were given a payment for the number of sheep they had. The national flock went from 35 million to 70 million overnight. To you torrie benefit bashers i suppose this behaviour is acceptable. Eddie some of your comments are not far removed from adolph hitlers or other right wing dictators. yes this torrie government is not far off a dictatorship. Mr Carter informed the people of Christchurch That Ecan may return to some form of democracy in the future meaning we may be able to exercise our right to vote for this organisation sometime when they see fit.

07 Nov 2011 08:04p.m.

Bill wrote:

Absolute idiots talking about how people on benefits only have themselves to blame. What about the families with both parents working, that don't have 6 kids and don't smoke or drink, AND ARE STRUGGLING!!! There are plenty of those. Low incomes that aren't rising and living costs that are, that's the problem. And if you don't realise this just wait, you will soon.

07 Nov 2011 07:29p.m.

David wrote:

If you must have six children, be prepared to work the hours to support them. Otherwise, tough bikkies. Cut their benefits.

07 Nov 2011 06:39p.m.

RA wrote:

I have worked for the same company for 35 years and have never minded paying my taxs , thats the differance between left and right . To say that all these parents on benefits spend their money on ciggies/ alcolol is not right , but sounds more about how you Toxic Act types feel about the people at the bottom of the ladder .

07 Nov 2011 06:24p.m.

isolina wrote:

finally some ones made a GOOD change although no surprises that national had nothing to do with it why dont poeple choose to make a change and prove the poles wrong if you want a better future for your children vote for anyone whose not act or national

07 Nov 2011 06:23p.m.

Mike Bodger wrote:

What was in the supermarket trolley at the home of the mother with six children?

07 Nov 2011 06:15p.m.

TargetedBS wrote:

Why do so many of them have to be Maori.

07 Nov 2011 05:31p.m.

humpty wrote:

child abuse, women abuse, crime, drugs and alcohol abuse, was the theme of the day under labour govt.