• Full Story

Greens and Labour join for aged care investigation

Print

Wed, 07 Apr 2010 2:12p.m.

Green Party aged care spokeswoman Sue Kedgley said the investigation aims to gather information about the level of care provided to elderly both in rest homes and in their own homes (file pic)

Green Party aged care spokeswoman Sue Kedgley said the investigation aims to gather information about the level of care provided to elderly both in rest homes and in their own homes (file pic)

Labour and the Greens are to assist Grey Power in running a nation-wide investigation to "shine the spotlight" on the state of aged care in New Zealand.

Announced today by Labour and Green Party aged care spokeswomen Winnie Laban and Sue Kedgley, the investigation aims to gather information about the level of care provided to elderly both in rest homes and in their own homes.

It follows concerns sparked by recent damning reports from the Health and Disability Commissioner involving rest homes, and cuts by some district health boards to spending on domestic assistance for pensioners.

Ms Laban said the investigation follows an approach from Grey Power and will involve "grass-roots" meetings with interested parties around the country.

She said the quality of aged care in New Zealand was declining at a time when the elderly population was growing fast, and her attempts to get the issue addressed in Parliament had been stifled.

Ms Kedgley said she hoped tackling the aged care issue in a manner that would set a precedent for how MPs investigated problems.

"Up until now we have sat in select committees and expected people to come to us with issues and problems, but what we are doing now is going out and talking to the elderly in their homes and their communities..."

Rest home audits had shown there were serious problems, but the lack of transparency about how they were run meant it was often difficult to know their internal workings and how huge amounts of taxpayer money was being utilised, she said.

Some of the problems came down to chronic understaffing, low wages and a lack of training for carers, she said.

Meanwhile, cuts to spending on house visits by carers to elderly people living at home meant there would be more pressure on those residents to look after themselves and carry out their own household duties, leading to social neglect and more accidents and hospital admissions as a result, Ms Kedgley said.

Such problems needed to be addressed rather than left to compound, she said.

Ms Laban said the elderly were a non-complaining but "hugely-stressed" group whose vulnerability was being exposed.

Grey Power president Les Howard said the most pressing concern at the moment was funding cuts to home assistance, signalled recently by health boards in the Otago and Southland districts.

He said an intention to keep people out of expensive rest homes and in their own homes for longer was fine if they had support, but if they were neglected the cost-saving goal would be negated in the long run through increased hospital admissions.

Replacing home visits with telephone checks was an ineffective way of monitoring someone's welfare, he said.

The investigation is due to begin in the next fortnight, with a report expected about July or August. That would be peer reviewed by experts and a second report was expected in about September.

Ms Kedgley said the report, which would shine the spotlight on the problems faced by the elderly, would be presented to the Government.

"And I would suggest they would ignore our recommendations at their peril."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

07 Apr 2010 07:34p.m.

brian wrote:

I have been within "care" for virtually all my life but professionally for ~ 25 years and this includes having had a specialist home for the IH until the "catch cry" of "normalization" tore apart responsible care. Our then size, and our staffing ratios precluded any "sweeping under the carpet" of any potential of inferior care, but - by our size - we were perceived - by the bureaucracy - but never so by our residents or their very supportive families, as being stifling of their development. Unfortunately this "development" was to be the case in the now "hailed" community care - where all the checks and balances were now eliminated, out the door and no longer available - and abuse became rampart. Yes, I have a huge case log of all of this. Worse too, the cost of this inferior care was far higher as the ideological idiots were "programed" - and enforced - to include "sex" education - using prostitutes - onto our IH who had - until then - no "awareness" of sexuality as "we" know it. These residents were - up until then - totally unaware as they were "unschooled" in what "happens" within what is euphemistically called "normal society" because they were 'mentally" too immature to comprehend, nor did they - in most cases - have "those" overt urges, being of such prepubescent age of UN-enforced awareness, and well beyond their level of comprehension. Now the Ali-baba of "so called" enlightenment is being "programed" onto - and into - them and the problems are now rampant. We now see the effects of the "normalization" upon our most vulnerable and its not a pretty sight. I totally agree that under staffing is rampant, so is our under funding. We are still being funded at less than what we should have been getting over 11 years ago, as per the study commissioned by Govt in 2002 and using 1999 data, all what the study then had available. A further review is well overdue but please, let it be bipartisan rather than just another witch hunt, looking to find political leverage.

07 Apr 2010 04:25p.m.

Lindsay wrote:

If Grey power are aiming this hunt at National then it is likely that they are responsible.

When National came into power it slashed spending on disability support programmes, for the elderly and for intellectual disadvantaged kids.

If Grey power are swinging away from National then that opens up this next election quite considerably.

But there is no guaranteeing that is what they will do, it is grey power and their vote depends very much on how much they have been helped by Labour or National.

And National could still come back in and buy them off again.

07 Apr 2010 03:39p.m.

Bill wrote:

It always amazes me when Political Parties who have been in power for years come out with crap like this. This problem hasn't just popped up in the last year, it has been there for a long long time even when Labour and the Greens had their power sharing. What a bunch of hypocrites we have in parliament.

07 Apr 2010 02:36p.m.

Lightseed wrote:

If only they had of done this when in government, there wouldn't be this usual mess by their government that national has to clean up.