• Full Story

Greens push for quake levy

Print

Sun, 20 Mar 2011 1:06p.m.

Covering costs would cost an extra $255m a year to service (NZPA, file)

Covering costs would cost an extra $255m a year to service (NZPA, file)

Borrowing to fix earthquake damage in Christchurch will cost the country millions of dollars in interest, and a levy on higher earners was preferable, the Green Party says.

Finance Minister Bill English said on Friday that the Government would borrow overseas to cover its $10 billion cost to rebuild Christchurch, spreading the burden over time. A levy was considered, but it would make it harder for the economy to recover, Mr English said.

Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said Australia was raising a levy to pay for rebuilding after recent floods, and their government was in a better financial position than New Zealand's.

"The Government is being fiscally irresponsible by putting the country into further debt when it could raise some revenue to help pay for the rebuild instead," Dr Norman said.

Borrowing $5b to cover the uninsured cost of rebuilding Christchurch would cost an extra $255m a year to service.

"On the other hand, a temporary levy on income could raise an additional $1 billion each year to cover quake-related expenditure avoiding costly borrowing," he said.

A levy of 1.5 percent on income between $48,001-$70,000 and a 3 percent levy on income above $70,000, with no change needed to the corporate tax rate of 30 percent, would raise $1.026b a year, according to Green Party estimates.

People earning $50,000 a year would pay an extra 58c a week, and those on $70,000 a year would pay an extra $6.33 a week. People on $100,000 would pay an extra $23.59 a week.

"We don't agree with Bill English who says that a small levy could stifle economic performance. The levy would target those on higher incomes who typically save or invest their additional income rather than spending it," Dr Norman said.

"The fastest, fairest, and most economically sensible way for New Zealand to rebuild the livelihoods of those in Christchurch is to introduce a temporary earthquake levy on those who can most afford it," Dr Norman said.

Funding the cost of about $10b from the earthquakes in September and February would push the Government's operating budget deficit to more than $16b, or 8 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), from the $11.1b forecast.

Mr English said on Friday that net crown debt could exceed 30 percent of GDP by June 2014, up from around 14 percent in June 2010. It would take a year longer than originally hoped to return to a budget surplus, now expected in the 2015/16 financial year.

It was important that crown debt returned to pre-earthquake levels "so we can absorb future economic shocks when they come along - as they surely will", he said.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Mar 2011 09:21a.m.

Kiwi wrote:

Deane reversing the tax cuts is pointless unless your going to reverse GST too. Otherwise all your doing is increasing taxes on everyone, including the low income earners you claim to support. I'm sure they will be more than happy with your suggestion.

20 Mar 2011 04:45p.m.

atrout wrote:

So Russel Norman thinks that the costs of the 'quake should be transferred to those NZers who have succeeded in life. By punishing those who provide capital and employment to the country we will both satisfy the Greens need to lash out at "the wealthy" and repair the damage in Christchurch!!! What a sad shower the Greens are!!! Would anyone like them to lead us back to the dark ages??? NZ certainly needs quality leadership but certainly won't find it coming from the Green Party.

20 Mar 2011 04:06p.m.

Shaken n stirred wrote:

What a bunch of idiots. Who is going to be tempted to remain here or come here to rebuild local economy and business infrastructure knowing you have to pay extra.

20 Mar 2011 04:05p.m.

braam wrote:

I am National, very very strongly, and I hate the greens, but this must be the first piece of logic that this party has come up with since insertion, good on you Greens.

20 Mar 2011 03:08p.m.

AaronC wrote:

Typical, brilliant ideas from the Greens, and Bill English and his cohorts racing to protect the rich peoples milk money instead of keeping us out of debt. Does Bill English have any clues? He wasn't even smart enough to pull a rent scam and get away with it, yet hes smart enough to fool us into electing him. What does that say about us?

20 Mar 2011 01:55p.m.

AndrewF wrote:

Just stick to saving and hugging trees Norman and leave the economics to the big boys.

20 Mar 2011 01:43p.m.

Deane wrote:

Reverse the tax cuts. I am sure most kiwis now realise that circumstances have changed, and its a far cheaper option for the tax payer in general than having to pay for the amount of interest the additional borrowing.

Golden, borrow only if its the last resort.