Greens think big after record result

Print

Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:49a.m.

Russel Norman

Russel Norman

By Angela Beswick

With an increasing number of young supporters and a growing voter base, the Green party is not ruling out replacing Labour as the biggest party of the left in years to come.

A record result for the party in Saturday’s election saw them take 10.5 percent of the vote and 13 seats in Parliament – about a 50 percent increase on 2008.

Speaking on TV3’s The Nation this morning, Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said his party is in a “pretty good spot”.

“We’re coming back with 13, possibly 14 seats if the specials come in nicely. So we’ve got a strong caucus, it’s a pretty strong team.”

Meanwhile, after one of their worst election results saw them take away just 27 percent of the party vote and 34 seats, Phil Goff’s future as leader of the Labour Party is in question.

“I think Labour is going to have quite a bit of work to do internally, it’s just the nature of the thing after a result like this,” Mr Norman said. “The Greens are gong to have a pretty clear run at it I think.”

Asked whether replacing Labour as the biggest party on the left is a possibility or an aspiration, Mr Norman pointed to Germany where the Green Party are larger than Labour’s German equivalent. But he said only good can come from the Green Party and Labour working cooperatively.

“Elections are a competition and so it should be. I think out of the competition between Labour and the Greens, something good has come out of it already. When you look at the policy Labour adopted in the lead-up to this election, we [the Greens] wrote a lot of it effectively – cause they adopted a bunch of our stuff - which is fantastic.”

With an opposition that is usually dominated by Labour now very much a Labour-Green partnership, Mr Norman said his party will have a much bigger impact and visibility in Parliament.

“We’ve done pretty well with limited resource, competing with Labour over the last three years so, when the balance has changed toward us… that obviously advantages us.”

VIDEO: John Key’s post-victory speech
Key toasts three more years
Banks takes Epsom, Brash steps down
Winston Peters’ triumphant return
Greens celebrate record result

The Green Party intend to continue making progress on the key areas it has identified; “kids, rivers, jobs”, Mr Norman said.

“We’ll be talking with National over the next week or so and looking at… it’s a combination of the ongoing memorandum of understanding projects; like home insulation, the cycle network, the contaminated sites identification and clean up project – which is already been actually quite important in Coromandel – and then what other projects we might put on the table.”

Asked whether the Green Party policy areas are expensive, Mr Norman says they will be focussing on projects that have good returns.

“The only seriously expensive one is home insulation, $320 million over four years – that’s still got a little bit to run out.

“We’ve done over 120,000, we’re heading for 200,000 homes retrofitted with insulation. So if you were to extend that project that’s serious money, but the benefits are at least three to one in terms of the health system – so it pays for itself three times over. People just use the health system less because they’re healthier.

“If we are going be talking about serious money – and we are in a pretty constrained fiscal environment – then we need to target projects that have good returns.”

Support for the Green Party is expected to increase to 11 percent once special votes have been counted.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Nov 2011 02:46p.m.

Mark wrote:

In all the talking and negotiating there is no mention of Global Warming and real stratergies for reducing CO2 emissions. The Greens have to focus and push this. We don't have the luxury of time on this one.

28 Nov 2011 01:02p.m.

The City is Ours wrote:

Now was the worst time to fracture the left, at least Sue Bradford gave voters in her electorate the right advise so now we are waiting to hear through the special votes some 3400 whether the gap of 349 votes between National's Paula Bennett and the Labour candidate can be closed for a win to Labour. By the time the Green's get in to represent the biggest party on the left there will be nothing left of New Zealand, the struggle for power gets in the way of preserving our way of life.

27 Nov 2011 05:37p.m.

Rob Edward wrote:

Ernst. You are an idiot if you don't think that 1 in 10 NZs voting green in the party vote (10.5%) doesn't reflect a desire to see greens and their policies in parliament. How many seats in parliament? 120 (depending on overhangs) and how many is 10.5% of 120? 12.6 therefore 13 seats..... Seems to be the will of the people Ernst... ;0)

27 Nov 2011 04:23p.m.

MICHAEL wrote:

THEY WILL FIND OUT VARY SOON 13 MPS IN OPPOSITION IS THE SAME AS 7 MPS IN OPPOSITION POWERLESS . ITS THE TRUTH .

27 Nov 2011 11:45a.m.

Juniper wrote:

Hmm, this is part of the problem. I agree it's a competition. But in a time when the right enjoyed huge support cannibalising the left was not a great move. It should, in those circumstances, be left vs right not left vs left vs right.

27 Nov 2011 11:28a.m.

Geoff wrote:

Greens will need to connect with non-voters

27 Nov 2011 11:17a.m.

Ernst wrote:

The most outstanding reason to dump MMP. Not a single electorate seat and 13 bums in Parliament. What a joke this system is.

27 Nov 2011 11:11a.m.

Clare wrote:

Many National voters are very green too and the Greens would have got votes from National voter; that would represent much needed environmental issues if they partnered with the current Govt.