Hekia Parata should’ve asked one simple question

Print

Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:21a.m.

Hekia Parata (Getty)

Hekia Parata (Getty)

By Political Editor Duncan Garner

I got home last night and my 12-year-old step daughter was waiting for me with a stern message: "We all hate John Key," she exclaimed.

Why, I said - pretending to be shocked by it all, but secretly knowing what she was about to say.

"Well, he's going to close our cooking and technology classes at our school. So we all hate him. And we're writing him letters - no one likes him at our school anymore," she said.

I won't name the school. But whether or not she's right, and whether or not this Government backpedals on its move to increase class sizes, the fallout is immense - and perception is reality - especially for the children and their mums and dads.

This change is seeping through the schools, to the teachers, to the kids, and they take that home to the parents - and parents vote.

It's a cock-up. Nothing else, nothing less.

And all because the Education Minister, Hekia Parata, didn't ask the right questions of the right people. Her eye was off the ball.

The Cabinet's collective eyes were off the ball.

John Key's move to save a paltry $43m by increasing class sizes in our intermediate schools has completely backfired.

It is a stuff-up of epic proportions - and all in the name of cost-cutting.

I have one question for Ms Parata - a question she should have asked the officials when this move was going through the Cabinet process.

It goes like this; who are the losers and winners from this change?

If the cuts amount to $43m of savings, who loses? Give me a list of the schools. She should have demanded the worst case scenario. It's a basic question.

She should have known that - because surely experienced ministers before her have asked that question when she was in her role as a senior public servant.

Now the fallout looks hard to arrest.

And it's given the teacher unions, who have been on the back foot with this Government, a chance to gain some kind of moral superiority.

They can reach out to parents once again - and say, this Government doesn't care - this Government got it wrong.

And it might be hard to argue with that. It also looks sneaky.

The Government did not promise this during the 2011 election campaign when they released their education policy in the final week. Nothing anywhere near it.

It also released post-election education pledges, and again none of this featured.

They misled parents. If they had been upfront about their intent, they would have lost votes. I have no doubt about it.

But they kept their intentions under wraps.

I have applauded Key and Bill English in the past for being different to past National Party ministers. They are less gung-ho. They know credibility is hard won and easily lost. They make incremental changes. They don't "think big".

Key talks about sticking to his promises and taking the public with him. And he largely has. But on this one - he promised nothing, did the opposite, and lost the people.

He and his Cabinet misjudged and mismanaged it.

And as chair of the Cabinet, Key probably has to take responsibility for that.

But he has been let down by his rising 'star' Parata.

She was promoted because she looked good and sounded better. She was a high achieving Maori woman in a party historically dominated by white men. What a coup. But over the past fortnight - it's counted for nothing.

She's looked poor and sounded even worse. She's sounded like a backpedalling public servant who is making it up on the hoof.

She and her Government went from claiming it's about quality not quantity, to saying no teachers would be lost, to saying seven teachers per school could be lost then saying no more than two will be lost. What a disaster.

And it's a disaster on Parata's watch. This will damage her prospects. And it's not over yet.

This Government is facing weeks and months of potential back downs over this. Key will have to return from Europe and cope with the fallout.

Teacher unions will not go away - this has revived them. This has pumped energy and oxygen into their cause.

The Prime Minister wanted a low-key two day Budget where the headlines disappeared quickly. He's failed on that front. Because he and his newly promoted Education Minister didn't do the due diligence.

No one asked the right questions.

Now the schools are fighting back.

The kids are angry. And the parents vote. They might even vote with their feet.

And that's a disaster for Key - all in the name of $43m of savings. The fallout isn't worth it.

Middle New Zealand is speaking out. Because Key, his Cabinet and especially his Education Minister didn't do their homework.

And for that I give them all a D minus. Epic fail.

And now the voters, the mums and dads they talk about may decide to put Key and his ministers in detention.

If it's a permanent detention - then that's called expulsion.

So Key may indeed look back at Budget 2012 - and say, that's when the rot set in.

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10/06/2012 6:20:14 p.m.

Joey wrote:

I think Duncan has valid points, but it's easy to say so when it's obvious mistakes, but I notice that the political correspondents on 3 news, Duncan especially has been particularly biased against National since the last election and even before. I think correspondents should cover stories as they are, it's not their place to influence public opinion (American presidential smear campaigns already show how media can be used by those who wield the right contacts) people are smart enough to make their own decisions. Report facts, and do not be so obvious about your preferences..... Yes it's obvious Duncan hates Natioanal.... He oozes it every time he speaks. Be fair, don't be biased, that's all I ask. Until Labour comes into power, and they will since National sealed it's own fate, and until I can see Duncan be as negative at Labour as he did National, I will not believe he is not biased.

9/06/2012 7:56:54 p.m.

cherie wrote:

What a lovely school she must attend

9/06/2012 3:55:04 p.m.

Robert M wrote:

In reply to Tweety, I say employing the inefficient and workers without the requsite intelligence or capabilites dosen't help our sociey or economy. It is better to have some sort of GMI and demand approprite levels of qualification and IQ for jobs. Generally teachers are bright enough, but the real skill they require is ability to control a class which requires on the job assesment.
THe Minister of Ed has been set up by her rival, Bill English who also probably leaked the emails to Hager.

9/06/2012 1:48:19 p.m.

Peter wrote:

So this teacher slip up is worth the crap the left will give you ....Give me strength....i was in classes of 30 to 40 kids

8/06/2012 1:47:10 p.m.

John C wrote:

The leftist school teachers of this country are accustomed to indoctrinating children. But it isn't often that the Government hands them such a big whip to use.

7/06/2012 4:29:49 p.m.

Boyd wrote:

Stop the continued special treatment of the rich and we might actually end up going somewhere!!

7/06/2012 2:10:39 p.m.

Tweety wrote:

Oh Duncan, where did I say you were responsible for what your daughter said. I said the Teacher was responsible, you had said your daughter came home and said it. Agreed, yes this debt I worry about will be passed on to future generations. That is my worry. If That makes me a loony as David says so be it. People in this country want, want and want more. They do not consider where the money to pay for it comes from. In this country the louder you bleet the more you get. Students should be paying interest on loans, the ones who have gone overseas should be paying the debt they owe. National Superannuation - I disagree, all tax payers should be treated equal. Big business with great accountants should be paying taxes like the PAYE earner, it needs fixing as they are not. Womens Affairs, Maori Affairs and all the unnecessary places like them should be gone, we can't afford PC wastage. The Benefit System needs a rehash from start to finish. Everyone needs to have to reapply and put in the category they belong in. We need sickness benefits for the sick not the lazy, we need the dole for the people who can't find employment, the ones prepared to do anything, not the ones who don't want to work. People get on here and quote figures from other Countries. Fine, but first look at out Welfare system, that is the reason we can't keep up with other Countries. And a little about me, I no longer work through illness, and it's a real illness I'm glad ts me as wouldn't wish it on anyone. My husband works, pays for Specialists, Drs and prescriptions. I am grateful that in my opinion we have a health system that is best you could get. I have done volunteer work, not just a small amount, my commitment taking a minimum of 20 or more hrs a wk, for over 20 hrs. I am definately not a loony in my eyes but I have come across a few. I get sick of the whining lot, and it's a big lot in this country who expect others to pay and continually do for them. The statement tax the rich, they shouldn't have been given Tax cuts makes me feel disgusted in the people making these statements. These people were handing over 38% of their earnings in Tax. Plus the 15% GST. Plus they pay tax on their petrol, alcohol and cigarettes. They pay rates, which is another form of Tax. So how much did they have left. The govt knew this, they realized if they didn't lower the rate to 33% which is still too high, these people would eventually leave and NZ would be even worse off. Finance companies have gone broke, people preparing for retirement lost their money, really Super is no longer an option. More should be done in finding where the operators of these companies have stashed their nest eggs. Last but not least, I did not get at your daughter as I feel you suggest. Your daughter will succeed, her parents will see to that not the Government.

7/06/2012 10:30:32 a.m.

Tom Gould wrote:

Interested in your thoughts on the latest diversion - the 'well, we do it for dogs' tactic? It has certainly knocked education off the radar.

7/06/2012 9:38:36 a.m.

Vagabundo wrote:

The budget has done two things that will have the opposition grinning - the Greens have a strong student base and the daft, decision to punish students who have studied for over 4 years by taking away student allowance (and by extension, making post graduate study a privilege awarded to the haves, but not the have nots) means if they can mobilise that voter bloc, the Nats are in for a punishing election. The teacher fiasco has not only given the teacher unions a firm platform to go on the attack, they also have the finances and the public backing to maintain a sustained assault on the government. They also campaigned over this in 2010/2011, and it gives them an opportunity to revisit those causes before a public that is more receptive. Labour have done well to turn this into one of their cause celebres, but that probably stems from having a leader with a background in education. What a stupid government.

7/06/2012 8:48:45 a.m.

Rawiri Tane wrote:

The 12 year old and all the kids at her school have got more commom sense then all the adults that voted for John Keys National Government