• Full Story

Hiding data won't stop flu weapon: expert

Print

Wed, 21 Dec 2011 9:19p.m.

The H5N1 avian flu strain is estimated to have a 60% mortality rate

The H5N1 avian flu strain is estimated to have a 60% mortality rate

The Government should not back US attempts to suppress details in scientific reports about how a killer birdflu mutated to become highly contagious, says an Auckland scientist.

US regulators are concerned the details might be used by terrorists to create a bio-weapon.

The virus is an H5N1 avian influenza strain that was genetically altered in Rotterdam's Erasmus Medical Centre, so it can pass easily between ferrets.

It is estimated it could have a catastrophic 60 percent mortality rate among humans.

The reports are due to be published in the prestigious journals Science and Nature, but the editors are considering the suppression request.

Auckland University microbiologist Dr Siouxsie Wiles says the government should help the public understand why such research was important.

"I do not believe the New Zealand Government should support the suppression of the Erasmus study," she said on the Science Media Centre's website today.

The United States National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (USABB) has requested the two journals to delete details regarding both scientific methodology and specific viral mutations before publishing articles on the research.

"The greatest risk was that such mutations could occur naturally where people and animals such as poultry lived together, and it was absolutely crucial scientists monitoring the viruses in the environment knew what mutations to look out for," Dr Wiles said.

"While there may be little risk to New Zealand of H5N1 from infected migratory birds, our proximity to Asia and the ever increasing popularity of air travel, make this a far more likely route for the virus onto our shores.

"It is important for everyone, policy makers and the public alike, to understand that a weaponised form of H5N1 may already be brewing in nature.

"In fact, this scenario is more likely than some so called rogue-state acting on the data in the two manuscripts submitted to Nature and Science."

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments

22 Dec 2011 12:03p.m.

Chargone wrote:

better still, hide it as much as you like, 'rogue' (read this term as 'we don't like them because they don't accept our right to decide everything for them' when dealing with the US government)states will get that information Anyway if they actually think they can do something with it, so hiding it doesn't really do you any good. better to have it available and find ways to counteract such plans.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)