High Court rules horses to go back to convicted animal abuser

Print

Thu, 16 Feb 2012 7:00p.m.

Foster parents say the horses were emaciated and had mange after being with Ann Power

Foster parents say the horses were emaciated and had mange after being with Ann Power

By Mihingarangi Forbes

In 2003 the SPCA removed 23 of Ann Power's horses along with 5 dogs. Those who were there at the uplift say they were skinny, diseased and seriously neglected.

But eight years on the High Court has ordered all the animals must be returned to Ann Power, the woman who allegedly neglected them.

Former SPCA worker Rachel Foster helped uplift the animals. She says she very clearly remembers the uplift.

“There was never any grass… The horses ranged from thin to worm burdened to emaciated,” she said.

She is in disbelief that the animals will be returned, saying Ann Power should never own animals again.

Campbell Live wanted to speak to Ann Power about the decision to return the animals but she didn't want to speak on camera. She later spoke to us on the phone.

“To say they were feral is just absolute lies. They weren’t showing ribs - a load of nonsense,” she said.

“I don’t care what false reports or fabrications there were, because in court it was proven there is more than meets the eye.”

She says she has “huge, beautiful paddocks” for the animals to return to, but also says she doesn’t have to justify herself to the people who fostered them,

“They clearly understood when they fostered them - it wasn’t ownership. If they had any concerns they could have gone back to the SPCA. They knew jolly well upon fostering it was exactly that.”

Don and Lynley have been members of the SPCA for 40 years and foster parents. They took two of Power's horses eight years ago

“They were emaciated. In fact, I stood and cried but I got my two, and took them back to our rural property. One had mange all over one side and it took months to clear it up, and the other worms almost like an extended tummy which is a sign of bad worms, so we had to go right back to basics with them.”

They wouldn’t let Campbell Live film the horses or tell us where they are. They're willing to defy the courts and hide them.

Ann Power calls herself an animal lover. Others say she's a hoarder.

Her front porch is home to dozens of caged birds, nearby dozens more chooks and out back dogs bark

A few kilometres down the road her horses graze. We count around 13.

But they're overstayers. The owners want the horses removed and they'll be contacting animal control next week.

Ann Power refuses to discuss that, but insists she has paddocks to house all the animals.

Where the horses will be housed is also a concern for the SPCA. Last week they tried to return two of them but when they arrived at the farm . The owner turned them away saying he didn't want them at his property.

It appears this is a recurring theme. Court documents show many more land owners have turfed her and her animals away.

We spoke to another who had Ann Power's animals on her property she said Ann Power should never be able to own animals because she rarely feeds them and her animals are so poorly behaved they damage the property.

Three other foster parents are standing by Lynley and Don

In a statement one says the decision is ‘a kick in the teeth, heart ache and pain, too much for some to ever think of being able to foster again. All because the law is weak and has failed again. Failed to support the tireless efforts of the SPCA, failed to stop suffering, failed to support anyone willing to help.’

Another says ‘[Power] was never punished for starving and neglecting the horses, she thumbed her nose at the court system and is now being rewarded for it by having the horses returned to her in good health and socialized. Why did no one stand up for the horses?’

The court has also ruled the return of five fox terriers that the SPCA has been caring for.

This despite a Rodney District Council ruling that power be banned from owning dogs till 2015, after two of her dogs attacked a woman in 2009.

Power has three convictions for neglect and dozens of council infringements.

“Past history and past behaviour is a good indication to future behaviour. If I were those foster parents I'd be fighting it tooth and nail as well,” former SPCA officer Rachel Forster said.

The SPCA says it's caught between a rock and a hard place. But Campbell Live understands it's looking into new legal action to keep the horses out of Power's hands. The foster families are 100 percent behind them.

“The thing is, they've been to hell those animals. The suffering they've put up with and now after eight years of love and care - their feet done every 6 weeks, fed everyday - there is now a ruling they have to go back,” Lynley said.

“It’s so wrong.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

27 Mar 2012 12:48p.m.

Tania Killeen wrote:

Unbeliveable, I have just seen this. We had her 'care' for four of our Lipizzaners, with a view to her purchasing two of them. The queen of deception is what Ms Powers is. Both my then husband and I love our animals and believed they were going to a beautiful home where they would be loved and cherished....HOW WRONG WE WERE, and then our nightmare began!!When we realised our mistake we did everything to get our horses back, and then we saw her true colours. We got one mare and foal with the help of the SPCA and we could not believe the condition they were in - we had a hell of a time trying to find them - even had to resort to 'dead of the night stealth' in our efforts, but we never found our other foal - we presume he is alive. What judge or human being in their right mind would ever let this woman have any animals ever again - she is cruel in her 'kindness'. I hope the animals she is demanding back are not returned, or they will surely face an early death through lack of care - or in the horses case, a requirement for dog food!!

27 Feb 2012 01:39p.m.

Samarah wrote:

I can't believe the judge!! Is he crazy or something!? He's a dumb idiot who deserves to be over looked. If they got an animal lover on the case he/she would make sure those animals are kept were they are, with people who love them!! I totally agree with Petra White. I mean Anne Power obviously doesn't care about the animals she doesn't care about them in anyway... She loves them, yeah right!!! Down with that stupid idiot of a judge and handg with Anne Power. I would gladly take on one of those poor horses. She needs to get with the programme, SHE'S NOT GETTING THOSE HORSES BACK!!

21 Feb 2012 03:54p.m.

Heather Corkill wrote:

Do not give this woman back these beautiful animals they desrve to be loved and cared for, the scary and horrid thing is that animals have no say and they just have to do what they are forced to do please protect these poor animals and keep a close watch on them I love animals so much I would love to take them myself

21 Feb 2012 08:31a.m.

Jenny wrote:

While I don't agree with Anne Power getting these animals back because I know her and she is mad and it is disgusting and I've seen her cattle totally trash fences and other peoples' properties when she 'grazes them out', I rescued my own horse back in Christchurch years ago from someone and he looked like this and the SPCA did NOTHING. They are a strange organisation who pick and choose.

20 Feb 2012 08:34p.m.

Kaitlin wrote:

that is horrid-ed she should not have the horses or any of the pets if i was a foster parent i would not let them take my horses, dogs or any of my pets. the foster parents have done so much and im a horses love and so full of pride to you parents <3

20 Feb 2012 05:03p.m.

Jim Seaview wrote:

To the SPCA and all the kind Foster parents of these 23 noble animals, and the 5 dogs, you have done an excellent, job but now you have all been kicked in the guts by our High Court Judges. To think that these 28 animals are now heading back to Anne Power who has a history of animial neglect - and also she has not to pay for any of the care is beyond belief. I agree with SK "what drugs was this judge on!!!!!"

20 Feb 2012 10:02a.m.

sk wrote:

what drugs was this judge on!!!!! the evidence surely speaks for its self. It would be kinder to put the animals down than send them back to this woman. How can you order dogs to be returned to someone who has been banned from owing them!!! And how the heck can you send these horses back to that woman. Please, what can we do to ensure these animals ARE NOT returned to this disgusting excuse of a so called animal lover.

19 Feb 2012 12:49p.m.

Mike wrote:

I was brought up on 2 farms I myself had 7 Horses and we had 200 Angora Goats for breeding aswell as Cattle.

I feel that the horses in Question should not go back to the owner.
What an Out Cry for the Foster carers of these Horses for the past 8 Years.

The high court should be Over ruled go to thye Cheif Judge of The land and also get all Local and Far Farms and Partition the Ruling.
A change in the Law is Seriously required.
I say get the owners of the Horses and have them thrown in Jail and not fed every day for the next 8 Years.

18 Feb 2012 02:41p.m.

dutch wrote:

I hope everyone who's fostering horses will not return them but hide them and defy the court. I also hope the word gets around and no one will lease pastureage to her.

18 Feb 2012 01:52p.m.

sarah wrote:

Anne Power should not have any animals, money will not stop her, medication might help. I have been to her property in the past, the smell of dead rotting horses next to her house. 50 or more not desexed dogs interbreeding, chewing and pissing inside the house. Anne will not change. The foster homes are doing the right thing! 100% support from me.