Dog owners should first gain licences - Hide

Print

Wed, 07 Oct 2009 5:45p.m.

Mr Hide is proposing dog owners obtain licenses to own a dog

Mr Hide is proposing dog owners obtain licenses to own a dog

By Sia Aston

Dog owners could be asked to get themselves licensed to be in charge of a dog - it's one of the ideas put forward by ACT MP Rodney Hide who is calling for a review of dog laws.

Last week, a Tokoroa woman faced charges after her eight dogs set upon and viciously attacked Maggie Christensen who was out jogging.

Mrs Christensen told 60 Minutes she needed 25 hours of operations and six skin grafts – she will likely bear the scars for life.

Local Government Minister Rodney Hide is calling for an overhaul of dog laws.

“I don't think what we've got is particularly rational or sound and I want to see if we can do better,” he says.

Under current laws, dangerous dogs must be micro-chipped and certain breeds cannot be brought into New Zealand.

All dogs must also be registered with the local council.

Mr Hide says the measures don’t touch bad dog owners

“I think we tend to target the responsible dog owners and let the irresponsible dog owners that are causing the problem off the hook,” he says.

Mr Hide suggests all dog owners should first get a licence, an idea that has gained widespread support.

Phillip Lyth, of the Kennel Club, has welcomed the idea saying it would provide a great background check that the owners have suitable skills to control a dog.

“We would want an idea of licensing dog owners, not to be a money grab but to be just like driving a car - people proving they've got the skills,” she says.

Mr Hide says a review will look at dog laws and question whether local councils are best placed to administer them.

Both the SPCA and the Kennel Club say they are better equipped to administer laws than local councils which each interpret laws differently.

“They all have their own ideas, some are very good, others are absolutely diabolical and they have the ability now to set the law locally - crazy stuff,” says Bob Kerridge, of the SPCA.

Mr Lyth says even council charges for dog registrations are also hugely variable.

In the Southland district an annual dog licence is $16, in Auckland City owners will pay up to $121 and in Wellington $147 is being paid by some dog owners.

Mr Hide's review is apparently not under any urgency though - he suggests starting it in 2011.

3 News
 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Oct 2009 10:38p.m.

David wrote:

Really Simon, we should ban dogs on account of the fact that ALL of them are dangerous animals. You really hate animals, don't you? I'm sick and tired of people like you trying to push your own self-centered agenda onto everybody else. Nobody agrees with your mentalist agenda so keep it to yourself.

09 Oct 2009 04:42p.m.

Jan wrote:

National licensed the gun owners instead of the guns and look where that got us...
It will not make a bit of difference...it will only target the good owners again...meanwhile a lot of money will be made and the problem will not be fixed...
The bad breeds should never have been allowed into NZ in the first place...Cannot shut the gate after the dogs have bolted....Same as the guns....

08 Oct 2009 10:53a.m.

jan wrote:

Yes I agreed, dog owners should be licensed, cats are harmless..

08 Oct 2009 10:41a.m.

Karen wrote:

Incredible ignorance as usual. Go google a copy of the pit rules. Fighting dogs are the dogs least likely to bite you. No room for man-biters in the pit. What you see roaming the streets or loose in packs like the pig dogs that attacked that woman are just dogs, in the hands of idiots. Licensing owners will make no more difference to bad ownership than a driver's license makes to drunk drivers. All that is needed is standardisation of the bylaws across the board to rein in the megalomaniacs in local councils and after that ENFORCEMENT! It does make more sense to license owners than individual dogs however, as per gun licenses. Such a change will benefit responsible dog owners, but it still won't make a jot of different to the feckless and antisocial among us.

08 Oct 2009 08:40a.m.

Simon wrote:

These animals are dangerous ,why does anybody need them, let alone eight of them? This poor women will have to carry this with her the rest of her life, because someone else wanted to keep pets, its just horrible! Ban these animals and get it over and done with.

08 Oct 2009 06:59a.m.

Chippie Sheppard wrote:

Responsible pet ownership is a good thing, if one is going to license the owners it should be for all types of pets... then there would be no need to license the animals. There are way to many cats roaming around and not being cared for. Dogs are not the only pets people have.

07 Oct 2009 10:56p.m.

Diana N wrote:

That lady had EIGHT dogs. I'm not licensing myself to have a dog!How much is that going to cost? In theory it's a great idea. But then that is the advantage of a theoretical idea.

07 Oct 2009 10:34p.m.

Rob Willows wrote:

I've voted Act twice, including in the previous election, however this would be enough for me to vote otherwise next election. Legislation like this never changes the behaviour of 'bad dog owners.' All it does is make things more difficult and more expensive for responsible dog owners, and represents a disturbing desire to micro-manage citizens behaviour. This kind of initiative is reminiscent of the worst, populist knee-jerk kind of policy one would expect from the more radical Green or Labour element. It is troubling to see it coming from Act.

07 Oct 2009 10:31p.m.

Rodney wrote:

Rodney go hide somewhere your voice cannot be heard. Another bold idea from Rodney, one without substance

07 Oct 2009 07:57p.m.

david Thew wrote:

Agree dog owners should be licensed, at a very nominal fee As to letting dogs run free, many are not under control, and many frail or elderly are scared to go on “At Loose areas” as they would struggle to pick their pets up out of harms way All dangerous breeds should have be neutered/spayed and any new puppies after a certain date put down, Most who own these types fit that bill as well