3News » Home

ID cards for all can simplify our lives

Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.
Imagine never having to fill in another registration form where you regurgitate the same information again and again; name, surname, telephone number, address, email address, birth date, gender, health insurance number, driver’s licence number, passport number, bank account number etc.

The same information, over and over again. And if you change just one bit of that information, you have to remember where you needed to give that piece of information, contact those organisations and let them know of the change.

That can all change, by implementing a system modelled off a couple of ideas that have been working—quite successfully—on the internet with web services like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and many other services that you use everyday.

NZ would implement one card—not the one from Woolworths, Foodtown or Countdown but a similar idea—that acts as your ID, your driver’s license and also a means of transferring/accessing personal information.

A centralised system that stores your personal information and allows 3rd-parties access depending on the level of clearance you give them, much like Facebook Connect. Simply swipe your card and enter a PIN to give clearance to your information.

No more filling in forms with the same information every place you go; the video store, the gym, the doctor — yes, your medical records will follow you from your local GP to the Accident and Emergency room, meaning there’ll be less time wasted filling in forms or getting important information from your GP; information like allergies or other vital pieces of personal medical history that could save, or take, your life.

What if you lose your card? Or if it is stolen; someone will have access to everything! They could take on your identity! The card can’t be used without a PIN; if that’s good enough for your money, then it should do for your identification and personal information. The PIN could take any form; whether it’s a literal number (like we use for EFTPOS), or a biometric reading (like a thumb print.)

A PIN will be required for any action or clearance to take place; that is if the video store owner, receptionist at the GP or personal trainer at the gym doesn’t question you for not resembling your ID photo.

It becomes ever harder to look like your sister’s driver’s licence photo from when she was 18, once you turn 18, if the photo that appears on screen is no longer of your 18 year-old sister but one that was taken last week when she created a new bank account.

Your photo ID is updated every time the system logs a new photo; say when you sign up for a new bank account. If you go to the video store, they have the latest photo to identify you by. The reverse isn’t true, an organisation will only see the latest picture of you, from organisations with clearance levels above them. That means the video store clerk can’t help someone else steal your identity by replacing your photo on the system with another person’s photo.

Other benefits of a centralised system mean that once you are enrolled and actively using it, you only need to make changes once. Change your address with the post office and your address will change everywhere at once.

This idea is an evolution of the OpenID solution that was proposed (and now widely implemented) for consolidating your online identity. The idea behind OpenID is that authentication with all web services are done by the same 3rd-party (your OpenID provider) so that once you login, you just need to point a service to your OpenID URL to login with that service. For example, once I have logged into my OpenID at www.ludwignz.com, if I want to log into another web service that has OpenID support, I only need to point that web service to www.ludwignz.com and can login, without authenticating again (or providing a username and password unique to that service).

The OpenID standard also allows you to create ‘personas’ (similar to the clearance levels proposed for OneCard) where you can specify what personal information, various web services are allowed to access. One place to log in, one place to keep your personal information up to date. Perfect.

Just one idea—stolen from the interwebs—that we can adapt to make NZ a better place.


We live in a time where technology is busy invading every part of your life, and every bit of that technology is starting to get the ability to communicate with one another.

The internet has been the most influential piece of technology yet, and will continue to change our lives drastically as we come to understand the power of connectivity.

Logged On will look at what principles or ideas succeeded online and how we can apply them to our society; our government and its systems, as well as your private lives.

You needn't be scared of the digital age; instead embrace technology in a way that will make your life easier and safer.

Ludwig.

Previous Logged on entries

comments: 6
Ludwig Wendzich
07 Aug 2009 7:49p.m.

The service should definitely be free for consumers. Firms on the other hand need to purchase the "readers" that read the cards, and will also need to purchase the software that understands whatever the reader is saying, and then also subscribe to database of information. The One card service in question would have to subscribe to other databases also however I think that this would lead to issues like we have now with MTRs in the mobile space. Realistically everyone should be able to access everyone else's databases free of charge. The service providers make money by providing and maintaining the systems for the firms where the consumers use the card. If OneCardNZ#1 can possibly have most of their business with just one bus company, another could specialise in GPs etc. The service providers would let consumers sign up for free because the more people they have wanting to use their cards, the more firms will be willing to implement the infrastructure.

jmurray
07 Aug 2009 7:14p.m.

Would be interested to know how a private company would make money off this information store, without somehow selling information or charging me for this ID service?

Ludwig Wendzich
07 Aug 2009 7:05p.m.

It's easy to say that it will fail because it's hard for the reading devices to become ubiquitous but I'm sure the same was said when EFTPOS was first introduced. Cash is still available and you will still be able to fill out the forms the old fashioned way if you wish, this will the alternative of the future. At some point there'll be a tipping point, NZ just reached that with EFTPOS, where more people use the newer technology than the old. Up until then, it's slow and steady, but if people believe in the benefits it will pay off. First there was EFTPOS. Then there was Snapper. Why not One Card? I'm not really sure how the ID KEY would be better, for all intents and purposes the card would serve the same purpose, and more. Along with biometric readings (fingerprints) that act as a PIN (as a 4 digit PIN is not really secure enough in my opinion) I think this crd will help deter identity theft ALTHOUGH It's important to note that this is not designed to fight identity theft, it's not security, it's luxury. It's FOR good, not AGAINST bad, in design.

Roger
07 Aug 2009 6:02p.m.

For these ID cards to deter fraud it is a must for everyone to have these cards and every point of transaction should have reading equipment. Nationally it is virtually satisfy both these conditions and hence it is obvious that these cards will fail. If the government is serious about combating all types of fraud crimes than they should make banks exploit honesty restoring ID KEY system described on website www.xwave.co.uk which will make outdated signature and PIN systems reliable. Even courts should find banks rather than victims liable for losses caused by fraud crimes because these crimes are preventable if banks exploit proposed ID KEY system.

Ludwig Wendzich
07 Aug 2009 4:26p.m.

I certainly don't propose that this is run by one agency and certainly not the government (http://twitter.com/danielzollinger/status/3171180946 and http://twitter.com/ludwigw/status/3171191506 .) I strongly believe, that like OpenID, there should be multiple providers (who are of course regulated) so that we can choose who we trust most. My proposal is that the government institute a standard/system which other companies then implement. The government do not have access to your information unless you give them clearance to do so — of course I also think it would be important for it to be illegal for the One Card provider to provide your information to 3rd-parties without your information, whether it's the local gym, the bank or any other company who just wants to buy your personal information. If you were to go on the run from the government I think that they could possibly get their hands on your information via a subpoena which they can do anyway today, just is a lot more laboured process for them. All info in one place, yeah it can be dangerous, but it can also be bliss.

James
07 Aug 2009 3:56p.m.

This all sounds great... but I see two problems. Firstly, this information would be kept centrally and I do not trust the Government not to sell this information. They sell the electoral roll in the UK so I am sure over time there would be nothing wrong in selling companies complete records of my consumer activity, medical records etc. Secondly, I find it generally distasteful to have so much information about myself on file... the inner rogue spy in me is worried that I may at some point have to go on the run and evade government agents.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio