3News » Home
Full Story

Is the super city a cover for privatisation?

5 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA

video
Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.
Auckland, as we all know, is a shambles. But when it becomes a super city it will be a mean, lean, council machine, worth roughly $28 billion.

To put it in context, when the Auckland councils merge they will have assets worth considerably more than our two largest companies, Fonterra and Telecom, combined.

Which is why, whether you live in Wellington, Christchurch, Ashburton, Inglewood, the Kapiti Coast or Gore, Auckland matters to you.

Tomorrow, Labour MP Phil Twyford is putting a private member's bill before Parliament to protect Auckland's assets like, for example, Ports of Auckland. The idea is to require a referendum before any such assets are privatised when Auckland becomes a single, super city.

He argues the architects of the super city, politicians like ACT's Rodney Hide, want to sell these assets off.

Mr Hide is a rabid supporter of privatisation. In fact, as recently as last week he said: "Of course I'm in favour of privatisation. I love privatisation."

His party's policy on local Government includes such phrases as: "Local government will be required to shed its commercial activity" and "roads and piped water will be supplied on a fully commercial basis".

So, will Auckland assets come up for sale? And is it a good thing or a bad thing if they do?

Campbell Live speaks to Rodney Hide about his plans for Auckland.
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [5]

Maddie
19 Aug 2009 7:44p.m.

Read the words and see them for what they are - "Local government will be required to shed its commercial activity; roads and piped water will be supplied on a fully commercial basis". That means no subsidies whatsoever, no more Eden Park or Mt Smart, Libraries, Theatres, Museums, Art centres, Rubbish disposal, Council housing, Parks or reserves, no local body assistance to any voluntary or Charitable organisations. Airport, Ports and Water sold. C'mon Auclanders wake up! Tell us what other assets will be
under the hammer because you were all too apathetic to respond!

Warren
19 Aug 2009 7:18p.m.

Government owning all the assets is communism. capitalism is not perfect but it is way better than any other option. government control is a recipe for mediocrote. i'm so passionate about this I can't even spell Mediocrete

Jan
19 Aug 2009 4:32p.m.

That is why Mr Hide and his party and many of the National party are there...to sell off the country...It was on the cards after the election we would go down this road...Wait until the next election and see what is up for grabs....

John
19 Aug 2009 12:36p.m.

Thanks John. Your story has left me mad as hell at Mr Hide and his cronies in the National Party. They didn't even mention the 'super city' during the election campaign, we were blindsided after the votes were in. We were then told that full consultation had taken place when it clearly hadn't been. A Royal commision review was undertaken, and it's findings ignored. Now this silly little man is sitting in front of the nation lying to our faces!

Maddie
19 Aug 2009 11:56a.m.

Well done John Campbell and Team for exposing that the real reason behind Supercity is to hock off all it's assets to private buyers. You had Rodney Hide on the ropes completely, so please follow through with this story. I understand Auckland's Local Body assets incl reserves, museums etc is closer to $68 Billion. It'll all be up for grabs if Hide has his way.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Was the force used at the Dotcom mansion excessive?
On January 20th, two helicopters and 76 police officers arrived a
Comments (189)