Is your next egg pushing tigers to extinction?

Print

Tue, 19 Apr 2011 6:10p.m.

Neither Cadbury or any other chocolate companies have to state whether their products contain palm oil (Reuters file)

Neither Cadbury or any other chocolate companies have to state whether their products contain palm oil (Reuters file)

By Tony Reid

Auckland Zoo goers were given a hard hitting message today when they went to check out the tigers.

Every Easter egg they eat could be pushing them toward extinction.

That is because the palm oil used in chocolate is sourced from areas where endangered species once thrived.

Six-year-old Oz, a Sumatran tiger, was enjoying his giant Easter egg today.

But if he knew what was in the real thing he may have stopped licking.

“By us going out every year and buying chocolates for Easter we are contributing to the destruction of these guys habitat,” says Peter Fraser, Conservation Officer for the Auckland Zoo.

Indonesian rainforests are being stripped so rapidly by illegal logging and palm oil plantations that Sumatran tigers face extinction.

Auckland Zoo is doing its bit to educate people on which companies use palm oil in their chocolate.

“Four hundred animals of those left alive in the wild, we don't know if they are going to survive, they are on the knife edge,” he says.

By telling parents and their children that they are potential tiger killers it is hoped they will make them buy ethically when they hit the supermarket shelves.

If only it were that easy.

Neither Cadbury or any other chocolate companies have to state whether their products contain palm oil.

Cadbury was one of the many companies Auckland Zoo wrote to. It and others responded with a list of palm oil free products. 

“Chocolate that doesn't have palm oil will have this nice rich creamy texture, it melts on your palet, where as the items that do have palm oil in them you sort of have this residual fatty taste in your mouth,” says chocolate retailer Caroline Everitt.

Since there is nothing on the box, Auckland Zoo has compiled a palm oil free list of its own.

It is a small but important step to protecting this magnificent animal.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Apr 2011 10:03a.m.

atrout wrote:

I do not think that it is role of Auckland Zoo to engage in eco politics. They have a duty to look after the animals, not to try to influence consumer choice. If they are getting all hot and bothered about environmental issues, what about the big one of whether or not it is appropriate to keep wild animals in captivity?

23 Apr 2011 06:18a.m.

Chocolate and Tiger Lover wrote:

@Davo - Thank you. It is true that chocolate is good for your health and that is also why we eat it at Easter. Most forms of food at good for you in moderation. @Mooney - I didn't watch the video. I just read the article and that was enough for me. Now that I've watched the video, that is all the more reason to get the chocolate manufacturers into replanting rain forests rather than trying to counteract rainforest destruction by not eating chocolate. It would be nice to see Cadbury sponsoring a bengal tiger family.

22 Apr 2011 02:22p.m.

Davo wrote:

@N Mooney - there is some evidence that chocolate in small quantities has various health benefits. So get your facts straight.

22 Apr 2011 12:18a.m.

simon wrote:

why is a PDF file not helpful ange? are you stupid and dont know how to open it? even though all you need to do is google PDF and you will find free software to download...your comment makes you look like an idiot. sorry.

20 Apr 2011 05:55p.m.

Ange wrote:

Very disappointed about the palm oil free egg guide, only available in PDF format... Yeah REAL helpful...

20 Apr 2011 01:01p.m.

AaronC wrote:

You have to be careful about Palm oil touted as "sustainable" palm oil. For example, using palm kernel, Fonterra are commited to using only sustainable Palm Kernel for stock feed. However, they are only commiting to that in 2 years from now. So in the meantime they will bulldoze as much rainforest as possible, and then once its flattened and the habitat is destryed, they will start measuring sustainable from there. They dont mention that they will flatten vast tracts of forests beforehand. Hey thats business, if you buy milk products, and or palm oil products, you might want to consider what that means for orangutans tigers and other incredible wildlife. Dont let a good ecosystem stand in the way of a big bank balance.

20 Apr 2011 11:34a.m.

Michelle Patton wrote:

I'm pretty sure that if you watch the article properly you'll find that Auckland Zoo are not against boycottinig chocolate, merely products that contain the highly destructive product that is palm oil.
The goodie guide contains lots of chocolate that doesn't contain palm oil, so they are in fact promoting eating of chocolate! You missed the point entirely!
Boycotting palm oil is the only way to save endangered species from extinction in time. We have to act now. Simply asking for more palm oil plantations to be planted is ridiculous, as that is the whole problem - rainforest is being destroyed for this product!

20 Apr 2011 10:47a.m.

cyril wrote:

Palm oil chocolate is crap anyway so I wouldnt buy it if I knew they had used it wether sustainable or not.

20 Apr 2011 10:13a.m.

N Mooney wrote:

Dear 'Chocolate and Tiger Lover,' I think YOU need to 'take a reality check.' Magnesium is available from a plethora of other- much more nutritious- foods, including certain fish, fruits, nuts, grains, juices, dairy items and vegetables. Most of which also contain naturally occurring calcium. Claiming a man-made product such as chocolate to be 'good for the health of human beings' is a bit of a joke. Oh and 'Dan' - life doesn't go on, that's the point. Though, I believe your really, really crucial and eloquent message to the world is that your life gets to 'go on'... oh joy, lucky us.

20 Apr 2011 10:05a.m.

luke wrote:

Chocolate doesn't need palm oil. And from my experience Palm oil based chocolate is the cheap crap that sticks to the top of the mouth and is way too sweet.