Italian quake conviction would be 'outrageous' - academic

Print

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 8:30a.m.

US President Obama tours the earthquake-hit town of L'Aquila in Italy in 2009 (Reuters file)

US President Obama tours the earthquake-hit town of L'Aquila in Italy in 2009 (Reuters file)

By Ally Mullord

A New Zealand academic says if Italian scientists are convicted of manslaughter for failing to predict an earthquake it will be outrageous and unjust.

Seven seismologists in Italy are facing charges of manslaughter for failing to predict an earthquake in the town of L'Aquila in 2009.

Victoria University Geophysics Professor Euan Smith says a conviction would be “outrageous and unjust”, and earthquake prediction isn't possible to that degree of accuracy.

Mr Smith was working for the seismological observatory ahead of the March 1987 Edgecumbe quake that hit the Bay of Plenty.

After 10 days of small earthquakes in the area, his director advised that a press statement be issued informing people “there is no reason to expect that there will be a larger earthquake forthcoming, but the earthquakes will continue and people should take sensible precautions”.

While the press statement was going out on March 2 the magnitude 6.5 earthquake happened, he says – something it would have been impossible to predict.

“We can only describe the likelihood of an earthquake of some magnitude occurring within some wide time period at some location,” Mr Smith says.

“We can’t say that an earthquake will happen on a particular day at a particular size, it’s not possible.”

Ken Ring has claimed to have predicted the Christchurch earthquakes, but Mr Smith says Mr Ring’s “track record is abysmal”.

“I’ve been asked if scientists should be accountable for the statements they make and I believe they should, within their area of expertise. Mr Ring’s not accountable.”

While quakes may not be possible to predict, Mr Smith says the earthquake vulnerability of a community can be estimated – something he says should have been more closely monitored in the Italian town of L’Aquila.

L’Aquila had two large earthquakes in the last 600 years, he says, but residents “persisted in living in buildings which were earthquake prone”.

“It seems to me much more responsibility rests with the people who allowed that circumstance to persist, rather than the scientists, who were trying to say something about the swarm of earthquakes that was happening.”

Watch the video for the full interview

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

27 Sep 2011 02:30a.m.

GR wrote:

Yeh you're doing really well Ken, by predicting 221 days of increased earthquake activity this year, and ignoring the earthquakes that occur outside that period. Are you deliberately deceitful or are you delusional?

23 Sep 2011 06:25p.m.

John wrote:

Ken Ring, I suggest you re-read the article. Professor Smith does not admit that he failed to predict the Edgecumbe earthquake. What it actually says is that his DIRECTOR released a press statement talking about the likelihood of an earthquake happening. Looks like he who is without guilt already chucked a couple of stones.

23 Sep 2011 09:00a.m.

Ken Ring wrote:

It is a bit rich that Mr Smith admits he failed to predict the Edgecumbe earthquake and yet calls my track record abysmal, when on 14 February I twittered that Christchurch was going to receive a big one and it did. Obviously if Mr Smith lived in Italy he would be on trial. Let he who is without guilt throw the first stone.