• Full Story

Iwi take strong stand on asset sales

Print

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 7:55p.m.

Prime Minister John Key at Waitangi

Prime Minister John Key at Waitangi

By Cleo Fraser

Iwi leaders took a strong stand against law changes to facilitate the sale of state assets in talks with Prime Minister John Key at Waitangi on Sunday.

Iwi leaders met with Mr Key, Finance Minister Bill English and other National MPs to discuss a number of issues, including Treaty of Waitangi obligations in plans to partially sell state-owned companies.

The issue has potential to split the Maori Party from the government coalition but Mr Key has expressed confidence that a solution can be found.

Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples told NZ Newswire any decision to split from the government "remains with our electorates and these iwi leaders and they will advise us".

"The government needs to realise how vital this is to Maori," Dr Sharples said.

A unanimous decision was made by the iwi leaders that they would not budge and the law should be strengthened.

"It will be interesting to see what happens on the negotiation table and my job," Dr Sharples said.

Mr Key remains optimistic a practical solution that still maintains the Crown's responsibility when it comes to the Treaty can be found.

"I'm confident we're going to do that."

The government says private companies can not be bound by Treaty obligations.

Mr English and State Owned Enterprises Minister Tony Ryall are leading a consultation process with iwi around the country on the issue.

The State-owned Enterprises Act contains a clause committing the government to acting "in a manner consistent with the Treaty of Waitangi".

One alternative is to cover the companies with a Treaty clause that sets out the government's obligation as a 51 per cent shareholder.

The Maori Council is also expected to lodge claims with the Waitangi Tribunal to challenge the asset sales, arguing they affect Maori claims to water.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

06 Feb 2012 03:52p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

Wont it be very interesting to watch parliament on tv tomorrow,Wonder who will leave the chambers first????Wonder who will be the Noisiest?,and who will butt in with a lot of retention? Who is going to get chucked out by the leader of the house????This is the first day back for the Kindergarten so should be interesting to watch.

06 Feb 2012 12:54p.m.

b,c,d.. wrote:

'a' just had a brain fart! What part about 'theft' or 'injustice' is emotive or contrived? I'm sure you would change your tune if the crown confiscated your neighbours land that happened to include half of your property as well. You have you head in the clouds buddy, just because it happened in the 1800's doesn't make it any less important.

06 Feb 2012 08:43a.m.

a wrote:

@Cheeseman.... your definition of equality is highly selective. You have a major case of 'willing suspension of disbelief". The use of terms such as 'theft, injustice, racism, accomplice' and so on are emotive and contrived. Sorry mate, but you have built a house of cards and stacked then against logic. Some day reality will bite and the true meaning of equality will become obvious to even the most biased observer.

05 Feb 2012 10:35p.m.

Richard Cheeseman wrote:

The racist norm is still that Maori property rights, like the property rights which are enshrined in the Treaty provisions in various laws, need not be respected when inconvenient. Colonial injustice and racism have still not ended in Aotearoa. It's still the case that any Maori property can be instantly confiscated by the state whenever big business decides it should do so, and that's what's happening here with the Maori property rights to the assets used by the SOEs. Like most thefts, this one will be instantly followed by a cut-price sale to an accomplice, when these public and Maori assets are flicked off, against the will of the majority of New Zealanders, to the foreign and domestic capitalist puppeteers who pull the strings of the National and Act parties. Sadly, Maori insistence on the full recognition of their property rights, i.e. on their equal status as New Zealand citizens, is still dismissed as living in the past (or as Erm put it, "childish tanties)." But non-Maori property rights, also rooted in the past, i.e. confiscations past, are by contrast completely sacrosanct. The white racist attitude to Maori property remains, "What's yours is mine and what's mine's me own."

05 Feb 2012 09:17p.m.

derek wrote:

Iwi can take as strong a stand as they like- fact is asset sales are going to happen & quite frankly, bring it on. It's high time we had some real wealth & investment in NZ. Time to open your eyes & to stop living in ancient historical times

05 Feb 2012 09:06p.m.

atrout wrote:

It seems that we are a country divided. We have a legislative system where we elect our representatives who through their wisdom, or lack of it, have instituted a convention of 'partnership' where one partner can overthrow decisions made by the elected representatives of all. South Africa once had a system where the real power was held by one race over the other. That changed and was legislated against in order to achieve a country without a differential race based bias. New Zealand is now firmly committed to becoming a country divided by race- only a fool could believe that it can work. Morally and in terms of a modern democracy it will create huge tensions in our country, It will take many decades to undo the mess created by good intention and a lack of understanding about citizenship. Ethnic diversity can be supported and appreciated but different types of citizenship is foolishness.

05 Feb 2012 08:13p.m.

Erm... wrote:

Iwi got less votes than National at the last election. We live in a democracy, National are in power, stop the childish tanties.