John Banks mistaken for Winston Peters by Parliament guard

Print

Tue, 20 Dec 2011 6:12p.m.

ACT’s John Banks says he was mistaken for Winston Peters by a Parliamentary security guard

ACT’s John Banks says he was mistaken for Winston Peters by a Parliamentary security guard

By Patrick Gower

New Zealand's 50th Parliament has sat for the first time today, so MPs could be sworn in.

Swearing allegiance to the Queen meant yet more angst from Hone Harawira but some returning old faces could not hide their joy at being back.

It is now official - pinch yourself if you have to – Winston Peters is back in Parliament. 

And media relations are not much better than when he left three years ago.

Mr Peters brushing off any questions about New Zealand’s First’s game plan for the next three years.

We all know Mr Harawira is no fan of the Crown.

So he squeezed in a quick shout out of his own on the way down.

In the end, Mr Harawira did his duty and duly swore the oath.

Then almost forgot to sign the papers.

Not that the whole ceremony meant a great deal to the Mana leader.

“You just cross as many fingers and toes as you can because it’s absolutely meaningless to me.”

The Greens agree, and want the oath modernised so you can swear to the Treaty.

“I'm looking forward to the modernisation of the oath…I just feel like it doesn't reflect who we are,” says Green Party MP Catherine Delahunty.

But one Green MP was not complaining: Mojo Mathers - New Zealand's first deaf MP.

She described the ceremony as “very moving”.

Lockwood Smith was only pretending to be a reluctant speaker – it’s tradition.

And there was no hiding that John Banks was pleased to be back – telling a story before Parliament about his first day back on the job.

“It was only surpassed by a security guard on day one when I arrived here two weeks and two days ago when he said it’s so good to see you again Winston.”

Mr Banks says its strange to be back again.  

“It’s rather surreal,” says Mr Banks.

Surreal alright. Whoever claimed ‘history never repeats’.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Dec 2011 11:42a.m.

Mike wrote:

@bOb. You really made your name arse now! All shares are sold through the stock exchange and you can not sell your shares privately as the transfer is effected through the registrar. That way the sale of shares is controlled. Duh!!!!!

21 Dec 2011 09:59a.m.

bOb wrote:

@ Duh its been sold(re-distributed) to these at the top of the food chain(not mum and pops) and there is nothing stopping them from individually selling it them off to overseas buyers. If anyone is duh its you with your naive gullibility.

21 Dec 2011 08:59a.m.

Aiden wrote:

clarke needs to go take his medications, what an nutter. if clarke thinks key lost the election then labour were completely decimated, na, juts another swore labour looser forgot to take their medications, moron

21 Dec 2011 08:37a.m.

Mike wrote:

@ Clarke. You have spewed your crap on various blogs all over the place. It is obvious you are of below intelligence or just plain arrogant. Again I will write slowly so that even you can understand. Statistically, of the third of people who failed to vote, the vote would have gone the same way. All poles before the election also showed that National was going to win by the biggest margin ever. The technicality you so freely refer to, nearly worked in favour of Labour. I would suggest that you pack your bags and get the hell out of this beautiful country, as you obviously contribute stuff all . One less benefit to pay out!

Long may National rule and continue to make this a prosperous wonderful country!

21 Dec 2011 08:02a.m.

Ruby wrote:

I can't afford to buy parts of our assets. No one I know can. Can you? Will you?

21 Dec 2011 12:08a.m.

Clarke wrote:

To John Key, supposed Prime Minister of New Zealand. you are the only Prime Minister I know of in New Zealands electoral system that has managed to gain the office with a measly total of 33 percent support... with 66 percent either voting against you or chosing not to vote for you at all. Do you believe that you have a "moral mandate"... yes yes I know that by law you have a technical mandate.... but a moral mandate is what you need for the changes that you propose... and you do not have one. How does it feel to be Prime Minister knowing that 66 percent of total elligible voters did not vote for you. May I make a suggestion Mr Key? think about whether you have a moral mandate for the changes that you propose... hacking at the rights of underpriveldged individuals and selling off state assets in combination with a weak and disorganised opposition gave us a government that is operating with no more than 33 percent support from the voting public. You have no mandate Mr Key.... think about that. operating on technicalities is what you are good at, operating morally and in the best interests of the country and those who live here seems to be something you do not know how to do. Think about the fact that Paula Bennett.... at a time when Nationals votes were increasing in most electorates... nearly lost her seat completely which shows that even amoungst you own voters her open hatred and bigotry towards The sick and disabled is behaviour that nearly cost her her seat. You have no moral mandate for what you are about to do, if you had actually managed to achieve a moral mandate for the changes you propose... far more people would have truned out to vote. You really did lose this election Mr Key, I have no respect for a leader who can not even achieve a moral mandate from the people. you may govern... but you do not really have the peoples support.

20 Dec 2011 11:08p.m.

Duh wrote:

The public assets remain in NZ shareholders hands under a majority stake, and the remainder is being sold to NZer's. It's not being stripped from anybody. This is what people have been too unintelligent to grasp since before the elections. Inform yourselves.

20 Dec 2011 10:00p.m.

pondering wrote:

Is it just me or is anybody else getting a "Lemony Snickert " vibe off the retro politician deal

20 Dec 2011 09:09p.m.

ken wrote:

when the public assets are stripped from New Zealander, there should be a law added that if any politician, there family ,friend , trusts or employees buy shares then the politician should be done for inside trading,

20 Dec 2011 07:34p.m.

Alex wrote:

History does repeat itself - first as tragedy, then as farce.