3News » Home
Full Story

John Key calls benefit shake up a 'kick in the pants'

47 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
John Key

John Key

video
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 5:32p.m.

By Rebecca Wright

The Government’s new rules for beneficiaries are a kick in the pants, John Key has said.

In future, solo parents will have to work for the Domestic Purposes Benefit (DPB), at least part-time, once their youngest child is over six.

Those wanting sickness benefits will also have to work if they’re assessed as being capable.

Those who do not comply will face a new penalty – their benefit may be immediately halved at any stage, for such things as failing to turn up to a job interview.

Sickness beneficiaries will have their claims re-examined frequently and may be sent for a check-up to a doctor of the Government’s choice.

Both unemployment and sickness benefits will now be one year only, then you will need to reapply.

Mr Key calls it a “package designed to help those who need it” and “a kick in the pants to those who need that”.

Talking tough on beneficiaries is a traditional National Party preoccupation and today the Government followed through – announcing it is cracking down.

“Too many people have become trapped in a life of welfare,” says Social Development Minister Paul Bennett.

“Existing from week-to-week on a minimal income, trying to juggle bills, clothing, food, and looking after families.”

First in the firing line are solo parents on the domestic purposes benefit. Solo parents, whose youngest child is over six, will be work tested, and may have to work between 15 and 29 hours each week.

If they don’t comply, their DPB will be cut in half.

Ms Bennett says that, starting in October, the Government is looking at getting long-term welfare dependants, who are “certainly making no moves to get off”, into work.

The unemployed will also have to prove they’re pounding the pavements looking for work, or face a three-strike penalty of their own.

For failing to meet their work test commitments the first time, the benefit will be cut by 50 percent.

One a second strike, the benefit is suspended.

The third time, the beneficiary will have their benefit cancelled altogether.

The idea is the beneficiary has an obligation to their fellow taxpayers to do everything they can to get a job.

Those on the dole for longer than a year will also have an extra hoop to jump through – reapplying after 12 months.

Sickness beneficiaries also face tough new hurdles and could also lose their benefit if they don’t comply.

National talked tough on welfare during the election and today it delivered. These proposals will now face Select Committee scrutiny.

The Maori Party says cracking down on the DPB mums might be too tough and it may not support those measures.

But National has ACT on side, and so most of these changes are likely to become law.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [47]

James
23 May 2011 7:39p.m.

“Existing from week-to-week on a minimal income, trying to juggle bills, clothing, food, and looking after families.” says Paula Bennet - yet minimum wage offers no more. Typical Nat BS. If you want lower unemplyment and fewer people claiming benefits, vote these hypocrites out.

Puck
21 Feb 2011 7:01p.m.

Well they really planned this well the unemployed certainly can't afford to use public transport everyday to go to job interviews so they'll have to apply for jobs that are walking distance away from them or should they budget for that as well or stop eating while they're looking for a job. BTW How much does it cost to use public transport these days. Its pretty expensive in auckland. Here's one for you sam if they're not ripping off the system they'll be ripping you off instead you push ppl into poverty they'll come and visit sam.

SEE THROUH THE MEDIA PROPAGANDA
13 Jun 2010 1:15a.m.

you rotton hypocrit its you mr key that are defrsuding the tax payers you and your mps sir i put it to you sir you are the one that needs a kick in the pants . you and your mps are worse than these people who abuse the welfare syestem , why becouse so do you mr key and your mps abuse the mps welfare syestem .ya rotton hypocrit mr key .

Conservie
23 Apr 2010 9:28a.m.

It doesn't inspire much confidence in Nationals supposed ability to make NZ rich if they are having to take from the poorest in the country.

If they were really confident about generating new wealth I would have thought they'd be talking about raising benefits. Instead they're really just dividing the existing pie up differently: giving more to the rich

Karen
18 Apr 2010 1:06a.m.

To hell with this nasty national govt, im on the invalids benefit and i will now make sure i cost them plenty more for assessments and drag it out to the max, if they cut my benefit i shall keep my children off school because i wont be able to afford to send them, etc etc, cause this govt as much trouble as you can!

David
17 Apr 2010 11:59a.m.

Marie you make a good point, Nick dont be so PC about this because unfortunately it is a real problem, but it just happens to be in her family, and what i think marie is trying to say is that why should us hard working tax payers who really do struggle to pay the rent, why should we pay for them to not even try, how do you explain the fairness/logic in that, good on the national govt for having the balls to make a difference.

I think nick you have just completely misread her comment because I say good on her for doing the right thing and not joining your family or the rest of their social class, and i suggest nick you reread her comment before you jump to accusations because if you think that there are not people/families like there are not families like this, then you need to open your eyes

Jamie Winter
12 Apr 2010 6:14p.m.

why cant you stop alot of the asians coming here and working and taking jobs of new zealanders not being racist but are unemployment would change dramatically if this would happen

Nick
28 Mar 2010 6:20p.m.

Wow what a massive f**k up for the national party, I am not so sure that they realize that there is a general election in a year or so.

@Marie, you are a mutt, what a horrible person you are, talking about your own family like that. You make me sick!

Nicole
27 Mar 2010 8:31p.m.

I am a genuine sickness beneficiary, I have manic depression and musculo skeletal disorder which means my back has failed on me and I can't just do any form of work like most people. I don't enjoy getting $160.00 a week when my rent and bills come to $160.00 a week! I can never afford food I cant buy new clothes anything, so no it's not a luxury being on the benefit! I hate being home all day! I have been seeking part time work, and the lack of jobs out there how are you meant to get a job? especailly when racism, discrimination all of that come into the factors aswell! Yes there are some people that abuse the system... but now theres going to be alot more homeless people around because there's no jobs, and welfare wont give tem anything! so thank you john key, your gonna be seeing alot of solo mothers out there on the streets because they can't find a job and can't have a home becuase you cut thier benefit! good job national! what a great thing your doing! NOT!

Dan
26 Mar 2010 12:39p.m.

@Sam: exactly! Nats have a habit of stating they want to do this and that but no transparency as to what will be the process involved, how will that benefit the tax payer, what will be the final result? Their way of hanlding things is not democratic at all. This whole set of changes being implemented are like a dictatorship where people HAVE to accept whats being done. Nats are out of govt. as far as I am concerned. Idiots voted them in.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio