• Full Story

Key not worried by asset sales referendum

Print

Key not worried by asset sales referendum

3News NZ

The Greens and their partners have gathered 240,000 of the 310,000 signatures they need for a referendum (file pic)

The Greens and their partners have gathered 240,000 of the 310,000 signatures they need for a referendum (file pic)

Prime Minister John Key says he's not worried by calls for a referendum on asset sales.

The Greens and their allies in the Keep Our Assets coalition are aiming to gather enough signatures for a citizens-initiated referendum by the end of next month.

Co-leader Russel Norman, speaking at a rally in Auckland yesterday, says there's "a real possibility" the Mighty River Power share float will be pushed back to March next year.

"A referendum on asset sales could be held early next year, before any of the power companies are sold," he said.

"It's only fair a referendum is held as soon as possible to give the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders who oppose asset sales the chance to cast a vote against them."

The Greens and their partners have gathered 240,000 of the 310,000 signatures they need for a referendum.

They want to deliver 380,000 because they're anticipating thousands will be struck off as invalid when the signatures are checked, as has happened in the past.

However, Mr Key says that once the authenticity of the names has been checked, which is a long process, the Government has 12 months to determine the date that the referendum can be held.

"When we are satisfied that they genuinely have the required number of signatures and they are legitimate, then we'll give some consideration to when the referendum might be held," he said.

When asked by media if he was worried about a potential referendum, Mr Key said "not in the slightest".

The Government wants to sell the Mighty River Power shares in November, but it has run into trouble with the Waitangi Tribunal which says the float should be put on hold until Maori water rights have been settled.

The cabinet will decide on Monday whether to go ahead or wait until March next year.

NZN

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

1/09/2012 11:30:15 p.m.

Tim wrote:

I'm not going to comment on the assets that are being debated over now with water rights and everything, but people are still forgetting we will still hold 51% of the total asset, so still in control of what will happen. And privitisation? Good for economic growth. More profit based, efficiency increases, earn more money, tax gets paid to the govt. If they go on sale, I know that I'll try purchase some, for a long term investment.

1/09/2012 9:33:46 a.m.

David wrote:

@BJ what rubbish.. if you had proof of that you wouldnt be posting it onlne you would be taking it to the police. God National Party sycophants are a desperate waste of time.

1/09/2012 8:44:07 a.m.

Wiseacre wrote:

Not worried = doesn't care. So he'll stall and stall and then obstinately plough ahead anyway and to heck with what the vast majority of the people want or what is in the best interests of the country. Every analyses agrees that selling our strategic, income generating infrastructure will leave us worse off. Way to listen to facts, reason, and the New Zealand public John.

1/09/2012 8:28:29 a.m.

TWE wrote:

A stupid waste of money, Labour/Greens know the government will just ignore it. The only reason they are doing it is so they can use the result as a weapon to score some points against National. They are gambling for votes using our money, and it probably won't get them enough votes anyway. The referendum system in NZ is a sick joke.

1/09/2012 8:05:22 a.m.

bj wrote:

greens have been paying people to sign their petition and also illegally approaching young, very young children and getting them to sign.