3News » Home

Keeping up with the Osamas

You always have to face the hangover in the light of the morning (Reuters) You always have to face the hangover in the light of the morning (Reuters)
Wed, 04 May 2011 2:04p.m.

With the NZ International Comedy Festival up and running, I’m in my usual place of trying to keep my show topical without sacrificing the overall flow of it, and can I allow myself a small gripe here, the news cycle isn’t making it easy.

First it was ACT and Hone, all falling over themselves to grab headlines in the week leading up to my opening night, then I have one night off and the US finally catches up with Bin Laden, and now a tornado? Give me a break, there’s only so much re-writing I can do!

The Bin Laden story has been a windfall, though. In the juxtaposition of the dignity, quiet sense of achievement and, yes, pride that came through in President Obama’s press statement, and the immediate sheer crass American-ness of the impromptu street parties which followed it we saw the two sides to the coin of patriotism.

There is something appalling about celebrating a violent death as if it were an overtime sporting win, even when the death in question is that of an equally appalling individual. The scenes were reminiscent of those in the Middle East which caused such understandable outrage, when certain groups celebrated on 9/11.

And really, when the world’s most advanced military intelligence apparatus takes nearly a decade to track down the most recognizable face on the planet, it’s not quite what I’d consider an achievement worth partying over.

As with any big night, though, you always have to face the hangover in the light of the morning. The faked death mask photo that circulated widely on TV and the web, the questions around the hasty burial at sea and the constant murmurings of conspiracy theorists are just the tip of the iceberg; more serious concerns are, and should be, being raised about possible retaliation and who knew what, when. Bin Laden’s death does not mark the end of the War on Terror, just as 9/11 did not mark the start of it, but those two events do bookend a particular chapter in world history.

Perhaps now, we can move on in some ways? Perhaps now that the single man who shouldered so much of the blame for what is, in reality, a much wider, deeper issue has been removed from the equation, the world in general and the US in particular might be able to take a harder, more balanced look at the causes and effects of terrorism and our response to it.

Jeremy Elwood’s new standup show (Un)Common Sense is on in Auckland and Wellington this month as part of the NZ International Comedy Festival. 

Comments [6]

Edward
07 May 2011 11:26a.m.

Agree with Jeremy and the others that the reaction is a tad crass. As for the naive Mr Rider who thinks everyone who doesn't foam at the mouth with glee over murder (even of a monster) or who isn't the greatest fan of American foreign policy is uneducated, I leave you with a quote: "I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." - Martin Luther King, Jr

Ryan
05 May 2011 01:57p.m.

@Tim: You think the USA has enemies because other countries are essentially "jealous" of them?! That is incrediably naive. I don't know what kind of education you received if you honsetly believe that - but obviously historical geopolitcal aspects weren't a key feature. Maybe you need a refund on your "politicl science" degree. Most people don't care that America is rich and has a powerful military - it's how they weild it that gets other countries pissed off. I agree with Jeremy here. It is crass - you can be glad that someone is dead but dancing in the street isn't cool and just like Jeremy it reminded me of the cheering in some middle eastern places following 9-11. Could you see them doing the same if the had captured him alive? - I can't, and that SHOULD have been their mission (whether it was or not is another matter - why shoot an unarmed woman in the leg who is charging at you, and then when your unarmed target does the same you shoot him in the head?).

ruth
05 May 2011 12:44p.m.

Thanks Jeremy, nice thought provoking piece. And there is definitely stuff we, as citizens of the world need to think about in regards to the whole 'war on terrorism' issue. I don't think the war will end just because Osama is dead. But then, I'm just a stay at home mum of 6, what would I know of politics? :O)

Will
05 May 2011 06:09a.m.

Also I should point out that although 2700 Americans died, and 372 non-Americans also perished that day. Yet we only see the Americans running around waving little flags. I have a question for you Tim - how many NZers like ourselves died in 9/11? 2 Kiwis died Tim, though I know you didnt know that...and 11 Australians. If there was at least a trial, I think it would have been a better PR move, at least in my eyes. The Nazis, responsible for killing around 3 million people in the death camps ALONE got trials at Nuremberg. Pol Pot died under house arrest at 72 years of age in 1998. He was never even tried for his crimes which resulted in the death of around 3 million of his fellow countrymen. And as far as deaths go, did you know the European migration to the Americas from 1492 to the 1900s caused deaths of anywhere up to 100,000,000 indigenous people? SInce the alleged terrorist attacks at the US were most likely retaliation for US military activity in the middle east from the mid 1980s (Bush seniors gulf war against Saddam Hussein - another dictator trained and backed by the CIA) killed 35,000 civilians. Thats already 10 times more than the trade center attack.. This is not a monumental closure of 9/11 - it took the worlds biggest and best equipped military a DECADE to find one guy. Thats an embarrasment, or just a plain old scam. Rumors Osama dies in 2001 are probably true, and Barack Obama needed to get the public onside before the elections... which is just over a year away. What with the billions of taxpayers dollars that just vanished recently, they needed to pull a big one out of the bag. Maybe the body was dumped in the ocean quickly because it simply wasnt him at all. Food for thought.

Will
04 May 2011 08:40p.m.

Heres an except from the press... About 303 times as many people have been killed in Afghanistan and Iraq than in the ghastly attacks of September 11, 2001. More than 130 times as many people have been killed in these wars and occupations than in all terrorist attacks in the world from 1993-2004, according to data compiled by the US State Department. More recent figures are un-available — after the 2004 report showed terrorism at an all-time high, numerous experts suggested that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were fueling an increase in terrorism. And buddy, dont attack this reporter. Do you have a political science degree? Is one needed to comment on world events? No, it isnt. People have the right to voice their ideas. Osama was trained by the CIA to perform terrorism. Thats right, the USA makes terrorists and helps them go about their job, with money and equipment. Everyone knows that-degree not required. Osama didnt claim the attack on 9/11, the blame was given. The US was trying to get into the middle east, making up stories about chemical weapon factorys in the back of trucks and other concepts that the public didnt accept - so it was false flag attack time - the US picked the world trade centre, wanting to get the world involved too. The planes flew in (non passenger, grey military planes with things attached to their bellies I might add) and the witch hunt was on for Mr Bin Laden. 10 years later, after the USA has squandered the 20 billion dollars entrusted to them by the Iraq people and having killed around 1.6 million unarmed civilians in the process, they find the scapegoat and kill him and some of his family with no trial, then dump him in the sea. Then the public takes to the streets in a drunken mass;a crass response to murder. Feeling good is different than having a piss up. Maybe the USA should stop making terrorosts, then this wouldnt happen at all. I think the blame should extend to the nation that claims to be the victim.

Tim Rider
04 May 2011 04:35p.m.

I don't want to be disrespectful, but I feel that would be justified as you have slightly disrespected the American people. First off, who cares if YOU think its a considerable achievement ? You are nothing more than a stand-up comedian. Your job is to write jokes, not make comments on actual important news. If you want us to take you seriously, can you please post a copy of your Political Science degree? And I whole-heartedly disagree with you regarding the American 'crass' factor. Having travelled to and spent large amounts of time in the USA and Canada over the years, I can tell you that the American people have a sense of patriotism that most Kiwis could never understand. You do not know what it is like to live in the most powerful nation on earth, who have enemies against them due solely to their success and excess. Bin Laden killed 3000 innocent human beings in cold blood. No warning, no real justification - just evil. Nothing the American people could do , would be anything nearly as bad. So do NOT say they are being crass etc. This is a monumental achievement in the closure of 9/11 You have some very silly ideas, either get an education or keep them to yourself in future ? Cheers

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio