• Full Story

Key says he's more frugal than Clark

Print

Mon, 09 May 2011 8:43p.m.

John Key and Helen Clark

John Key and Helen Clark

Prime Minister John Key says he is more frugal than his predecessor, Helen Clark, and her ministers.

Labour has been highlighting spending that it says it at odds with cutbacks as the Government prepares for a budget which contains no new funding next week.

Labour MP Chris Hipkins said the Government had upgraded its BMW fleet, beefed up personal security and given themselves a tax-free accommodation allowance.

The latest revelation was a $275,000 makeover for Mr Key's Wellington residence funded by Ministerial Services.

The renovations for Premier House included a $215,000 painting bill, $55,366 on re-carpeting and more than $3000 on new blinds.

"It reeks of hypocrisy when kiwi families are struggling to pay their bills each week," Mr Hipkins said.

"National needs to get its priorities right. John Key needs to make appropriate lifestyle choices as well.

"Every kiwi family struggling to pay the bills knows that if you can't afford to pay for dinner, new carpet and curtains for the lounge get pushed a long way down the list."

Mr Key said the accusations coming from Labour were "a bit rich". The Labour Government spent $45 million upgrading Government House, built a new Supreme Court and spent more each year it was in power.

Premier House had not been painted since 2000 and not carpeted since 1990 and had to be maintained.

"If you don't paint it, the advice we've had is it will deteriorate more," Mr Key said. "It's hardly lavish making sure you maintain an historical asset."

In 2009 Mr Key overruled a refurbishment plan because he thought it unjustifiable but the house now needed a paint job, and the carpet had been stretched four times and could not be done again. It was not replaced in his upstairs rooms.

Also, the spending on security was within budget and the renewing the BMW contract cost less than pulling out of it.

He accused Labour of avoiding the big issues because the Government had made strong gains on crime, unemployment and other areas.

"It's a little ridiculous to be arguing the case somehow that's extravagant simply maintaining an asset we own," he said.

"I don't fly first class like Helen Clark did, I don't take my partner overseas and then expect the government

to pay, I don't do a lot of things that previous governments did do and that's been true of my ministers.

Some expenses would be incurred and that was unavoidable but the Government had overall reduced spending.

"In my view we are managing the books well."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 May 2011 01:55p.m.

Clarke wrote:

Only someone with a militant mind could think the way you do mike, you probably still discipline your children with your hand or a plank.

You have had no knew ideas since the dawn of time, and your still working on possibly thinking about dreaming up something like the wheel.

The government books are strained enough without going all gunho military mike.
Perhaps think about feeding the population of New Zeland and focus on making sure the majority of them get through it with as much help as possible.

Dont sell the country out to american style politics where military is the answer to everything.

Not that I am against the military but jesus, make sure ordinary kiwis are doing ok before you think about how pretty the navy's frigates are, or how big and beautiful the missles on fighter jets are.

What a warped mind you have there mike.

The only thing New Zeland uses its military for is political gain, we arent at war with anyone.. so grow up.

Thats the core difference between left or right and the country has to decide whether they support a divide and conquer ragime or one that gives a crap about the people.

I think the peoples choice is still currently screw the military for now, they can still practice war.. and we have no interest in getting into one.

10 May 2011 11:04a.m.

mike wrote:

Nobody has had their snout in the public trough more than Labour. Take current expenditure on travel, Labour has less MP's, aren't running the country and yet spent more on public paid travel than National - all because they like spending money. The Labour solution is less accountability on spending, and spend more, so borrow much more than we are now. Lets hear how Labour will reduce our borrowing - not a word as they intend to increase it!

Labour turned down a modern fighter jet fleet as it cost too much money of $700 mil (which was basically a gift price for those jets and maintenence contract), then they turned around and contracted 4 frigates at over $1 bil each ... typical Labour. If have look at those frigates they are slow and designed not for NZ operation. They aren't suitable for peace keeping, nor defending NZ. Labour contracted the new BMW's, so are complaining. Paint Premier house 1st time in 11 years, re-carpet for the 1st time in 21 years? Those are relatively small maintenence expenses while the $36 mil Labour refurbishment was not.

PS Helen didn't take her husband overseas with her, she took her 'partner' of the time who was also protceted by DPS and flew 1st class when using commercial flights while John only flies business. Also, if her husband set foot in the USA today he would be arrested. Helen sent an airforce plane over to spirit him out the USA as he couldn't use a commercial flight at the time, something like the USA were holding his passport at the time to stop him fleeing commercially ... and if he stopped he was going to spend substantial jail time, care of uncle Sam. Of course the media could investigate what Helen's husband had done that required spiriting out the country, and why she did it at NZ's expense to get a criminal away from justice. And Helen is happily married ... and supports her husbands actions which Uncle Sam considers highly criminal.

09 May 2011 10:31p.m.

Don Key wrote:

I'm used to living in style..

I made the excuse that Labour spent more.. knowing that there was money when they were in Power.

I know there is no money, but I refuse to live within a budget.. thats strictly for commoners.

My security is important, it has to match the size of my over inflated ego.

I am only frugal on giving money to the poor, I spend extravagently when it comes to the rich and wealthy... ask my best mates.. the ones I gave the tax cuts too.

you call me a hypocrite? Bah, I am the most important man in the world.. and I dont care if my spending $300,000 means that a few more poor people have to die.

I am Don Key... kneel before me peasants and listen to the crap I spin to justify myself.

09 May 2011 09:41p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

Why is Key bullshitting again?he has departed from New Zealand more times than H Clarke ever did,He goes on to say the crime numbers have come down, Gone up 3% unemployment down,gone up to record high.Poverty he is proud of has increased twofold.Then he say!s the historic asset (government house)is that not on his agenda for a asset sale??Regquires new carpet and painting,Well that is very good for a rich arse to ask for his living standards to be up graded,Only wish some one would do that for me<and many more like wise.Also when did Helen take her husband Peter overseas??But Key did not take his partner he took some one elses.

09 May 2011 09:34p.m.

Average joe wrote:

In your dreams maybe Hindu.

09 May 2011 09:00p.m.

King Julian wrote:

You have to love the media slant in this case:

"The latest revelation was a $275,000 makeover for Mr Key's Wellington residence funded by Ministerial Services."

FYI: It is not John Key's house, it is Premier house.

09 May 2011 08:51p.m.

hindu joe wrote:

the guy is an idiot that nz'ers are getting real sick of.