• Full Story

Kim Dotcom bailed, eyes extradition hearing

Print

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 5:08a.m.

Kim Dotcom

Kim Dotcom

Kim Dotcom spends his first full day out of custody in more than a month today after being granted bail.

Dotcom, the multimillionaire founder of file-sharing website Megaupload who faces charges in the United States of racketeering, copyright infringement and money laundering, had been in custody since a police raid on his mansion north of Auckland on January 20.

He failed twice before Wednesday to be bailed after two judges ruled that he was a significant flight risk.

But Judge Nevin Dawson said in North Shore District Court on Wednesday that flight risk was not now of such concern, because all of Dotcom's assets and bank accounts have been seized and no new assets or bank accounts of any significance had been uncovered.

There is also some uncertainty about when an extradition hearing will occur.

"I am relieved to go home to see my family, my three little kids and my pregnant wife. I hope you understand that's all I want to say right now," said Dotcom, who will be bailed to a property next to the Dotcom mansion.

As part of the conditions of his electronically-monitored bail, Dotcom will not be able to access the internet.

The Crown has indicated it will appeal the bail decision.

Dotcom's three co-accused, Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk, now face up to six months before a hearing to extradite them to the United States begins.

In a separate hearing, the court was told the US government has yet to file the necessary extradition papers.

They must be filed by March 5, in line with the extradition treaty with New Zealand.

The four accused have been remanded until August 20, the provisional start date for the extradition hearing, which could take three weeks.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

02 Mar 2012 08:10a.m.

Geo wrote:

The "puppets of the US" point might be valid, but it's a separate issue. There is no question that his business made it possible for anyone to access for free, digital media that was A)Copyright protected, B)Not free, and C)Not his to distribute. He will face some charges overseas. He has broken International copyright laws.

02 Mar 2012 08:09a.m.

Geo wrote:

The "puppets of the US" point might be valid, but it's a separate issue. There is no question that his business made it possible for anyone to access for free, digital media that was A)Copyright protected, B)Not free, and C)Not his to distribute. He will face some charges overseas. He has broken International copyright laws.

23 Feb 2012 06:08p.m.

Paul wrote:

'Martin', I suggest you take off your stars and stripes tinted glasses and swap them for a pair that let you see some reality. In no way do I feel threatened by Dotcom or his past and wish him well. Under NZ law, people are not guilty till proven otherwise and shouldn't be treated as such. The German-based charges against Dotcom were sidelined in Germany as they had no serious substance, and Dotcom met all legal entry criteria to become a NZ resident, which he should be able to enjoy without people like you trying to undermine his rights. Personally, I would be happy to offer Dotcom a place to live while he has the opportunity to defend the US charges against him and I would be happy to contribute to his defence against what I see as trumped up charges by the CIA in support of the profiteering film and music industry who don't like the services Dotcom offers. And, I don't play golf, because I leave this to those who have time to waste and more money than they need.

23 Feb 2012 11:59a.m.

Martin wrote:

Guest you may want to save our tax dollars and offer to put him up until the trial is over then support him afterwards until you think he can get back on his own feet with the little funds he has. I am sure he will appreciate it and respect your property and change from his past criminal convictions in Germany. The justice system here and in the states must have everything totally wrong with such a nice guy like Kim Schmitz or Kim Tim Jim Vestor or whoever he is. I hope you don't play golf though.

23 Feb 2012 11:18a.m.

R wrote:

It's going to be very embarrassing for our judiciary and our whole legal system when it finally surfaces that he broke no NZ laws and that we have been a puppet to the US (yet again) who have no jurisdiction here. How many laws will be urgently passed by the government now to legalise this corruption of our legal system?

23 Feb 2012 07:24a.m.

Guest wrote:

Really pleased that Mr Dotcom can be with his wife and children - at least until it is proven that there is a case to answer, that he is solely responsible for. Right now it feels like a right royal US stitch-up. Good luck Kim.