• Full Story

Kim Dotcom to appeal bail decision, cites health concerns

Print

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 2:06p.m.

Kim Dotcom

Kim Dotcom

By Angela Beswick

Defence lawyers for internet piracy accused Kim Dotcom are planning to appeal a judge’s decision to decline bail.

The 38-year-old Megavideo founder was this morning further remanded in custody, until February 22 where he will face an extradition hearing.

His bid for bail was declined by Judge David McNaughton in the North Shore District Court.

It is not yet known why bail was declined, however prosecutor Anne Toohey had argued Dotcom was an "extreme" flight risk as he had access to large amounts of money, held three passports in different names and had been deported from Thailand in 2010.

Paul Davidson QC denies his client is a flight risk because his assets have been frozen and his business cannot operate.

Dotcom also has a heavily pregnant wife and children in Auckland.

Mr Davidson says Dotcom is disappointed with the ruling and has health concerns they will raise with the High Court.

Dotcom has been in custody since Friday morning, when he and three associates were arrested during an extensive police raid at the 38-year-old’s Coatesville home, north of Auckland.

The four men, of which two are New Zealand residents, including Dotcom, are accused of racketeering, money laundering and internet copyright piracy in the United States amounting to $175 million in criminal proceeds.

The other three accused were remanded in custody pending a bail hearing later this week.

The US government is seeking to extradite the men to face charges in Virginia.

The accused do not face charges in New Zealand but local police have been aiding the FBI with investigations since August last year.

More than $17 million worth of assets have been seized from Dotcom's home by police, including two pistols.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

25 Jan 2012 09:14p.m.

boomtown wrote:

I love how "wondering" has decided the guilt of Mr Dotcom...I suspect he/she salivated over the zealous nature of the american-driven arrest and decided that in itself constituted guilt. I hope you never serve on a jury because justice is something you clearly know NOTHING about.

25 Jan 2012 07:01p.m.

maisie wrote:

Well, if anybody believes that this 'alleged criminal'is not a flight risk, as his representing solicitor says, they need their head read. This man has many contacts and 'friends' as it has been reported that support him in court. These are the means of getting money, transport and whatever he needs to get out of NZ. As for his heavily pregnant wife I am sure that she would be prepared to wait until he is settled in some non-USA extradition country and join him with their children at a later date instead of waiting for him to get out of jail.

25 Jan 2012 03:20p.m.

Erm... wrote:

Isn't is amazing how many criminals cite ill-health during bail hearings - and how many judges fall for it.

25 Jan 2012 03:19p.m.

wondering wrote:

I am wondering when this guy takes responsibility for his own behaviours and their consequences. Probably never . Typical and predictable criminal mentality. I am picking the health issues are self created and to do with his over indulgent living habits. Take your chances and your medicine in the jail showers chubby boy.