Kim Dotcom's Mega faces unique hurdles

Print

Mega faces unique hurdles

3News NZ

Kim Dotcom launches Mega (Photo: Dylan Moran)

Kim Dotcom launches Mega (Photo: Dylan Moran)

There was plenty of hoopla and a 'mega' party as controversial internet mogul Kim Dotcom has launched his new storage website last night.

But what does the website have to offer beyond the hype?

Technology commentator Paul Spain said on Firstline this morning that Dotcom has positioned Mega.co.nz as a cloud storage service similar to Dropbox and Microsoft Skydrive, but with added privacy controls.

"Those are not platforms that are particularly known for piracy of content," he says. "[Mega's] key differentiator is they're encrypting content on the way through, so in theory they won't be able to see what information is stored on their systems, which in some ways sort of lets them off the hook a little bit if there is illegal content that they're storing."

One of the accusations levelled at the old Megaupload.com site is that Dotcom and his business partners knew they were distributing pirated content, something they are trying to avoid this time around.

Files uploaded to the new Mega are encrypted in the user's web browser before they are uploaded to Mega's servers, so in theory, Mega doesn't know what their users are doing – and can't be held responsible.

Mr Spain says the authorities will be scrutinising Mega closely.

"But it's worth noting that there are lots of mechanisms today through which people will share files and will pirate content. This will just be one of many places where that can be done, but with the past attention [Dotcom's] had, the spotlight will be on him."

Since its launch yesterday morning, users have had trouble getting onto the site and uploading files. Dotcom claimed more than 250,000 people had logged on in the first hour, but Mr Spain says heavy demand might not be the only thing to blame.

"They've put it together in a very short space of time, and they've had to have servers in different locations than where they did in the past with Megaupload.com – obviously they want to stay outside of US jurisdiction – so they're using servers in other locations.

"That's perhaps been put together a little too quickly – but also it shows there is a lot of interest in what they're doing."

He also suggests there could be malicious attempts to take the site offline underway.

It has been a year since US authorities shut down Dotcom's Megaupload.com, but Mr Spain says a similar takedown of the New Zealand-based Mega isn't likely.

"It probably will create some political pressure for the National government, but as long as he in operating within the confines of the law here, then there is really little that can be done," says Mr Spain.

"What [Mega's lawyers] said is they've looked at Mega.co.nz in extreme detail from a legal perspective to ensure they're not breaking any laws."

Dotcom says he will be writing a book about the raid on his property in January last year. It is expected to be released in the middle of the year.

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23/01/2013 4:13:25 a.m.

Alexander Ernst wrote:

The idea to use browser’s encryption, even if based on AES-126 and 2048 bit RSA, by Mega is not so good and safe. Most of browsers are made in USA and must comply with USA regulations which foresee for non domestic usage smaller symmetric keys: in this case known number of bits will be set to null. Therefore, encryption will be not as strong as Dotcom assumes it. Additionally, Mega uses hash of user’s password to encrypt correspondent master key. This is a real security hole. Firstly, Mega’s bosses can’t say that they are not able to inspect downloads any time they will. For this it is enough to copy in a local DB login names and correspondent hashes. This may be done as well by a corrupted system administrator which cooperates with FBI or anyone else. Secondly, FBI agents may let them be registered as ordinary user und brows public share by Mega. Thirdly, automatically generated RSA key pairs are not proved for how strong they encrypt. There are a lot of such keys which do not encrypt at all. So that the whole PKI traffic may occur to run plainly. Summarizing, Dotcom is someone like baron Munchausen.

22/01/2013 8:52:13 a.m.

dave wrote:

As an artist, both visual and musical i am glad to see Kim Dotcom's new site up and running and challenging what i consider to be the racketeering cartels that currently exploit artists and consumers and clearly politicians and public servants also. What i wonder is that as the high court of NZ approved Dotcoms suing of the GCSB WHY HAS THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS NOT FILED CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST GRANT WORMALD FOR HIS CRIMES IN CONNECTION WITH THE TUHOE AND DOTCOM RAIDS AS HIS CRIMES WERE FAR MORE SERIOUS THAN EITHER TAMA ITI"S OR DOTCOMS AND INVOLVED A BREACH OF THE PUBLIC TRUST? Is NZs reputation for no corruption as bogus as its green rep, valid only because the corrupt are never, ever prosecuted in NZ? So here's to Kim Dotcom and the demise of the racketeering cartels monopoly and exploitation!

21/01/2013 9:10:36 p.m.

parviz wrote:

MRkim i wish to see you one day

21/01/2013 9:02:57 p.m.

parviz wrote:

thank you sir