• Full Story

Labour focuses on income inequality

Print

Wed, 09 Nov 2011 8:16a.m.

Labour is focusing on income inequality

Labour is focusing on income inequality

As the election campaign approaches the halfway mark Labour is focused on child poverty backed by accusations that the Government has created a widening gap between rich and poor.

Party leader Phil Goff will be in Hawke's Bay on Wednesday where he's going to discuss Labour's $2.6 billion plan to tackle child poverty at a series of community meetings.

He says income inequality has increased under National, the "underclass" Prime Minister John Key promised to eradicate in 2008 has grown and more families are destitute than ever before.

Mr Key is challenging the centrepiece of the policy - extending Working for Families tax credits to beneficiaries - and says its going to trap even more people into a life on welfare.

"The single biggest thing we can do to tackle poverty is to try and get people off welfare and into work," he said on Tuesday.

Mr Key is heading for Nelson and Auckland, armed with more policy announcements.

He's likely to hear more from Mr Goff this week about his "leadership failures" - a new Labour tactic aimed at countering Mr Key's huge personal popularity.

Mr Goff is accusing him of using excuses like the Christchurch earthquakes to explain the government's $18 billion deficit, and says it's time he fronted up to explain why 100,000 Kiwis left for Australia under his watch, unemployment has increased and economic growth has been poor.

Mr Key says Mr Goff is in denial over the difficulties the government had to face during its first term - and he doesn't care what the Labour leader thinks of him anyway.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Nov 2011 07:18p.m.

george wrote:

Well said Chris01 and quite true. Goff and Labour really have absolutely no idea about the economy. It really shows that few if any of them have actually run a business or worked in a business. Prime example is Phil Goff. He has been a professional politician for decades. What would he do or what is he qualified to do if he wasn't a politician? Interesting question

09 Nov 2011 05:15p.m.

keith wrote:

Ricardo ricardo ricardo. Goff dosent have to think you are stupid your inane comments say it all really. I dont think he has promised the earth. He has stated that he will borrow 4 billion more than Key and will balance the books the same time as the torries. The line you use is just brainless torrie rehtoric. Doug you dont need to be dumbed down i think you are doing well enough on your own. The only ones who want an underclass are your torrie mates who have created this class of people. I credit you with enough intelligence to recognise that the torries want an underclass so they only have to pay low wages.

09 Nov 2011 02:28p.m.

chris01 wrote:

You sure belabour (no pun intended) the tax issue Seannachie. You may think that National have unfairly cut the taxes paid by rich people... but you need to consider the fact that, after those tax cuts, households earning earning $150,000 or more, that is 9.7% of all households, pay 70% of the tax take. Households paying $120,000 or more, 17% of all households, pay 97% of all tax... and you want them to shoulder more of the burden??? Phil Goff constantly recites the mantra 'Their fair share'. Fair to whom?? Quite frankly the 40% of families who get more in benefits than they pay in tax need to be careful they don't kill the goose that lays the golden egg.

09 Nov 2011 11:04a.m.

Richard wrote:

Key gave more in tax cuts to the top 10% then what labour is offering to educate all kiwi kids, help them out of poverty and save us a lot of money in the future in areas like health and crime. Key keeps going hard on telling sick people & solo mums to get jobs, but remember there needs to be the jobs for the able bodied first. 60,000 extra people on benefits since Nats came in, you can't tell me they just suddenly chose to be there. There was more 100,000 more on benefits under National in the 90's, Labour reduced it by 120,000. So I can't see how you can blame Labour for benefits, they want people in jobs. Or looked after when there isn't any. Unless you want to live in a dangerous and selfish country.

09 Nov 2011 10:59a.m.

Seannachie wrote:

Whereas all Labour has to do is reverse Nationals Tax Cuts for the Rich to return $16Billion to the economy top pay for its promises Nationals continuing to afford these Tax cuts at the expense of the rest of us is a recipe for National Basnkruptcy. How brain dead do you have to be not to recognise that Nationals Tax Cuts are not only unsustainable but are also a rort to line the pockets of John Key and his Rich Mates at the expense of the rest of us. Stop being an economic slave struggling to survive and Vote Labour to get your freedom Back.

09 Nov 2011 10:52a.m.

Chargone wrote:

the single biggest thing you could do to reduce poverty is stop trying to screw over the entire country with free trade deals and actually take actions that encourage local production and growth. which leads to more work being available at better pay. which leads to, gasp, less people on welfare benefits. yes this does include tariffs, and does increase prices over all, but if done Properly increases income by even more, making a net gain for the general public, AND the government's coffers by way of taxes (and the income from the tariffs can be used to subsidise the setup of new production. new production leads to more exports of Different things, and thus less vulnerability to market shifts, which leads to more imports of Different Things, which lead to more production, which leads to more exports, and so on. net gain at every level. all you've got to do is ditch the insane economic policies which have lead to a replacement of Local production with Imports. well, that and realize that there is no such thing as a 'national' economy. there is a global economy, and there are regional economies. regions come in two types: city regions, which grow, develope, adapt to changing mrarket conditions, and improove, and supply regions, which do not. teh difference beween a rich suply region and a poor one is only that teh rich supply region can afford more social welfare. our governemnts have, for decades, persued policies forcing the entirity of NZ to be more and more locked into a supply region structure. the result of a mamrket shift on a supply region is easily seen in the muldoon/lange era events.

09 Nov 2011 10:36a.m.

Doug wrote:

Phil Goff wants everybody to be poor and on a benefit, you just can’t aspire to improve your lot in life, you will be just classed as a Rich Prick. That’s not a way to run a Country we should be all dumbed down to the lowest denominator according to Labour.

09 Nov 2011 09:27a.m.

Ricardo wrote:

Goff promises the earth, knowing full well he will not have to honour any of it. How stupid does he think we are?